Theorem dedth2v 4366

Description: Weak deduction theorem for eliminating a hypothesis with 2 class variables. Note: if the hypothesis can be separated into two hypotheses, each with one class variable, then dedth2h 4363 is simpler to use. See also comments in dedth 4362. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 28-Jul-2009.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dedth2v.1	⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
dedth2v.2	⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐷) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
dedth2v.3	⊢ 𝜃

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dedth2v	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem dedth2v

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dedth2v.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2		dedth2v.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐷) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
3		dedth2v.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝜃
4	1, 2, 3	dedth2h 4363	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)
5	4	anidms 562	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   = wceq 1601  ifcif 4306

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1839  ax-4 1853  ax-5 1953  ax-6 2021  ax-7 2054  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2134  ax-12 2162  ax-ext 2753

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 837  df-tru 1605  df-ex 1824  df-nf 1828  df-sb 2012  df-clab 2763  df-cleq 2769  df-clel 2773  df-if 4307

This theorem is referenced by:  ltweuz  13079  omlsi  28835  pjhfo  29137