P. 46 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 4501-4600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	r19.2zb 4501*	A response to the notion that the condition 𝐴 ≠ ∅ can be removed in r19.2z 4500. Interestingly enough, 𝜑 does not figure in the left-hand side. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
Theorem	r19.3rz 4502*	Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by FL, 3-Jan-2008.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
Theorem	r19.28z 4503*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2010.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)))
Theorem	r19.3rzv 4504*	Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
Theorem	r19.9rzv 4505*	Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
Theorem	r19.28zv 4506*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)))
Theorem	r19.37zv 4507*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)))
Theorem	r19.45zv 4508*	Restricted version of Theorem 19.45 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)))
Theorem	r19.44zv 4509*	Restricted version of Theorem 19.44 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	r19.27z 4510*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.27 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2010.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	r19.27zv 4511*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.27 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	r19.36zv 4512*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	ralidmw 4513*	Idempotent law for restricted quantifier. Weak version of ralidm 4517, which does not require ax-10 2138, ax-12 2174, but requires ax-8 2107. (Contributed by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rzal 4514*	Vacuous quantification is always true. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) Avoid df-clel 2813, ax-8 2107. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rzalALT 4515*	Alternate proof of rzal 4514. Shorter, but requiring df-clel 2813, ax-8 2107. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rexn0 4516*	Restricted existential quantification implies its restriction is nonempty. (Contributed by Szymon Jaroszewicz, 3-Apr-2007.) Avoid df-clel 2813, ax-8 2107. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	ralidm 4517	Idempotent law for restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1997.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	ral0 4518	Vacuous universal quantification is always true. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2005.) Avoid df-clel 2813, ax-8 2107. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝜑
Theorem	ralf0 4519*	The quantification of a falsehood is vacuous when true. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) Avoid df-clel 2813, ax-8 2107. (Revised by GG, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	ralnralall 4520*	A contradiction concerning restricted generalization for a nonempty set implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
Theorem	falseral0 4521*	A false statement can only be true for elements of an empty set. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) → 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	raaan 4522*	Rearrange restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2010.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	raaanv 4523*	Rearrange restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	sbss 4524*	Set substitution into the first argument of a subset relation. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 7-Jul-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	sbcssg 4525	Distribute proper substitution through a subclass relation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof shortened by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	raaan2 4526*	Rearrange restricted quantifiers with two different restricting classes, analogous to raaan 4522. It is necessary that either both restricting classes are empty or both are not empty. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ↔ 𝐵 = ∅) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)))
Theorem	2reu4lem 4527*	Lemma for 2reu4 4528. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))))
Theorem	2reu4 4528*	Definition of double restricted existential uniqueness ("exactly one 𝑥 and exactly one 𝑦"), analogous to 2eu4 2652. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤))))
Theorem	csbdif 4529	Distribution of class substitution over difference of two classes. (Contributed by ML, 14-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∖ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
2.1.15  The conditional operator for classes This subsection introduces the conditional operator for classes, denoted by if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) (see df-if 4531). It is the analogue for classes of the conditional operator for propositions, denoted by if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) (see df-ifp 1063).
Syntax	cif 4530	Extend class notation to include the conditional operator for classes.
class if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵)
Definition	df-if 4531*	Definition of the conditional operator for classes. The expression if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) is read "if 𝜑 then 𝐴 else 𝐵". See iftrue 4536 and iffalse 4539 for its values. In the mathematical literature, this operator is rarely defined formally but is implicit in informal definitions such as "let f(x)=0 if x=0 and 1/x otherwise". An important use for us is in conjunction with the weak deduction theorem, which is described in the next section, beginning at dedth 4588. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.)
⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))}
Theorem	dfif2 4532*	An alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4531 with one fewer connectives (but probably less intuitive to understand). (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2006.)
⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))}
Theorem	dfif6 4533*	An alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4531 as a simple class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ¬ 𝜑})
Theorem	ifeq1 4534	Equality theorem for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶))
Theorem	ifeq2 4535	Equality theorem for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐵))
Theorem	iftrue 4536	Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is true. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	iftruei 4537	Inference associated with iftrue 4536. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Oct-2018.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴
Theorem	iftrued 4538	Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is true. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜒, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	iffalse 4539	Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is false. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵)
Theorem	iffalsei 4540	Inference associated with iffalse 4539. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵
Theorem	iffalsed 4541	Value of the conditional operator when its first argument is false. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜒, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵)
Theorem	ifnefalse 4542	When values are unequal, but an "if" condition checks if they are equal, then the "false" branch results. This is a simple utility to provide a slight shortening and simplification of proofs versus applying iffalse 4539 directly in this case. It happens, e.g., in oevn0 8551. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → if(𝐴 = 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷) = 𝐷)
Theorem	ifsb 4543	Distribute a function over an if-clause. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2013.)
⊢ (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐶 = if(𝜑, 𝐷, 𝐸)
Theorem	dfif3 4544*	Alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4531. Note that 𝜑 is independent of 𝑥 i.e. a constant true or false. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ (V ∖ 𝐶)))
Theorem	dfif4 4545*	Alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4531. Note that 𝜑 is independent of 𝑥 i.e. a constant true or false. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ ((𝐴 ∪ (V ∖ 𝐶)) ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)))
Theorem	dfif5 4546*	Alternate definition of the conditional operator df-if 4531. Note that 𝜑 is independent of 𝑥 i.e. a constant true or false (see also ab0orv 4388). (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 18-Aug-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ (((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) ∪ ((𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∩ (V ∖ 𝐶))))
Theorem	ifssun 4547	A conditional class is included in the union of its two alternatives. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	ifeq12 4548	Equality theorem for conditional operators. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐷))
Theorem	ifeq1d 4549	Equality deduction for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝐶))
Theorem	ifeq2d 4550	Equality deduction for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐵))
Theorem	ifeq12d 4551	Equality deduction for conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝐷))
Theorem	ifbi 4552	Equivalence theorem for conditional operators. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 15-Jan-2004.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	ifbid 4553	Equivalence deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜒, 𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	ifbieq1d 4554	Equivalence/equality deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by JJ, 25-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜒, 𝐵, 𝐶))
Theorem	ifbieq2i 4555	Equivalence/equality inference for conditional operators. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐵)
Theorem	ifbieq2d 4556	Equivalence/equality deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝐵))
Theorem	ifbieq12i 4557	Equivalence deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐷)
Theorem	ifbieq12d 4558	Equivalence deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝐷))
Theorem	nfifd 4559	Deduction form of nfif 4560. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	nfif 4560	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵)
Theorem	ifeq1da 4561	Conditional equality. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐶) = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝐶))
Theorem	ifeq2da 4562	Conditional equality. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐴) = if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐵))
Theorem	ifeq12da 4563	Equivalence deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 24-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜓, 𝐶, 𝐷))
Theorem	ifbieq12d2 4564	Equivalence deduction for conditional operators. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Feb-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝐷))
Theorem	ifclda 4565	Conditional closure. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	ifeqda 4566	Separation of the values of the conditional operator. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Apr-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐶)
Theorem	elimif 4567	Elimination of a conditional operator contained in a wff 𝜓. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2005.) (Proof shortened by NM, 25-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifbothda 4568	A wff 𝜃 containing a conditional operator is true when both of its cases are true. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜃)
Theorem	ifboth 4569	A wff 𝜃 containing a conditional operator is true when both of its cases are true. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	ifid 4570	Identical true and false arguments in the conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2005.)
⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	eqif 4571	Expansion of an equality with a conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	ifval 4572	Another expression of the value of the if predicate, analogous to eqif 4571. See also the more specialized iftrue 4536 and iffalse 4539. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶) ↔ ((𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	elif 4573	Membership in a conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	ifel 4574	Membership of a conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	ifcl 4575	Membership (closure) of a conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	ifcld 4576	Membership (closure) of a conditional operator, deduction form. (Contributed by SO, 16-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	ifcli 4577	Inference associated with ifcl 4575. Membership (closure) of a conditional operator. Also usable to keep a membership hypothesis for the weak deduction theorem dedth 4588 when the special case 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 is provable. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶
Theorem	ifexd 4578	Existence of the conditional operator (deduction form). (Contributed by SN, 26-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	ifexg 4579	Existence of the conditional operator (closed form). (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	ifex 4580	Existence of the conditional operator (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	ifeqor 4581	The possible values of a conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴 ∨ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵)
Theorem	ifnot 4582	Negating the first argument swaps the last two arguments of a conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2007.)
⊢ if(¬ 𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐴)
Theorem	ifan 4583	Rewrite a conjunction in a conditional as two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ if((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵), 𝐵)
Theorem	ifor 4584	Rewrite a disjunction in a conditional as two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	2if2 4585	Resolve two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Mar-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐷 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝐷 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜃) → 𝐷 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = if(𝜓, 𝐴, if(𝜃, 𝐵, 𝐶)))
Theorem	ifcomnan 4586	Commute the conditions in two nested conditionals if both conditions are not simultaneously true. (Contributed by SO, 15-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝐶)) = if(𝜓, 𝐵, if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶)))
Theorem	csbif 4587	Distribute proper substitution through the conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2013.) (Revised by NM, 19-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶) = if([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
2.1.16  The weak deduction theorem for set theory This subsection contains a few results related to the weak deduction theorem in set theory. For the weak deduction theorem in propositional calculus, see the section beginning with elimh 1082. For more information on the weak deduction theorem, see the Weak Deduction Theorem page mmdeduction.html 1082. In a Hilbert system of logic (which consists of a set of axioms, modus ponens, and the generalization rule), converting a deduction to a proof using the Deduction Theorem (taught in introductory logic books) involves an exponential increase of the number of steps as hypotheses are successively eliminated. Here is a trick that is not as general as the Deduction Theorem but requires only a linear increase in the number of steps. The general problem: We want to convert a deduction P |- Q into a proof of the theorem |- P -> Q i.e., we want to eliminate the hypothesis P. Normally this is done using the Deduction (meta)Theorem, which looks at the microscopic steps of the deduction and usually doubles or triples the number of these microscopic steps for each hypothesis that is eliminated. We will look at a special case of this problem, without appealing to the Deduction Theorem. We assume ZF with class notation. A and B are arbitrary (possibly proper) classes. P, Q, R, S and T are wffs. We define the conditional operator, if(P, A, B), as follows: if(P, A, B) =def= { x | (x \in A & P) v (x \in B & -. P) } (where x does not occur in A, B, or P). Lemma 1. A = if(P, A, B) -> (P <-> R), B = if(P, A, B) -> (S <-> R), S |- R Proof: Logic and Axiom of Extensionality. Lemma 2. A = if(P, A, B) -> (Q <-> T), T |- P -> Q Proof: Logic and Axiom of Extensionality. Here is a simple example that illustrates how it works. Suppose we have a deduction Ord A |- Tr A which means, "Assume A is an ordinal class. Then A is a transitive class." Note that A is a class variable that may be substituted with any class expression, so this is really a deduction scheme. We want to convert this to a proof of the theorem (scheme) |- Ord A -> Tr A. The catch is that we must be able to prove "Ord A" for at least one object A (and this is what makes it weaker than the ordinary Deduction Theorem). However, it is easy to prove |- Ord 0 (the empty set is ordinal). (For a typical textbook "theorem", i.e., deduction, there is usually at least one object satisfying each hypothesis, otherwise the theorem would not be very useful. We can always go back to the standard Deduction Theorem for those hypotheses where this is not the case.) Continuing with the example: Equality axioms (and Extensionality) yield |- A = if(Ord A, A, 0) -> (Ord A <-> Ord if(Ord A, A, 0)) (1) |- 0 = if(Ord A, A, 0) -> (Ord 0 <-> Ord if(Ord A, A, 0)) (2) From (1), (2) and |- Ord 0, Lemma 1 yields |- Ord if(Ord A, A, 0) (3) From (3) and substituting if(Ord A, A, 0) for A in the original deduction, |- Tr if(Ord A, A, 0) (4) Equality axioms (and Extensionality) yield |- A = if(Ord A, A, 0) -> (Tr A <-> Tr if(Ord A, A, 0)) (5) From (4) and (5), Lemma 2 yields |- Ord A -> Tr A (Q.E.D.)
Theorem	dedth 4588	Weak deduction theorem that eliminates a hypothesis 𝜑, making it become an antecedent. We assume that a proof exists for 𝜑 when the class variable 𝐴 is replaced with a specific class 𝐵. The hypothesis 𝜒 should be assigned to the inference, and the inference hypothesis eliminated with elimhyp 4595. If the inference has other hypotheses with class variable 𝐴, these can be kept by assigning keephyp 4601 to them. For more information, see the Weak Deduction Theorem page mmdeduction.html 4601. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ 𝜒    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	dedth2h 4589	Weak deduction theorem eliminating two hypotheses. This theorem is simpler to use than dedth2v 4592 but requires that each hypothesis have exactly one class variable. See also comments in dedth 4588. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜏    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	dedth3h 4590	Weak deduction theorem eliminating three hypotheses. See comments in dedth2h 4589. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ 𝜁    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	dedth4h 4591	Weak deduction theorem eliminating four hypotheses. See comments in dedth2h 4589. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜓, 𝐵, 𝑆) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜒, 𝐶, 𝐹) → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜎))    &   ⊢ (𝐷 = if(𝜃, 𝐷, 𝐺) → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜌))    &   ⊢ 𝜌    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)
Theorem	dedth2v 4592	Weak deduction theorem for eliminating a hypothesis with 2 class variables. Note: if the hypothesis can be separated into two hypotheses, each with one class variable, then dedth2h 4589 is simpler to use. See also comments in dedth 4588. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 28-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐷) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ 𝜃    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	dedth3v 4593	Weak deduction theorem for eliminating a hypothesis with 3 class variables. See comments in dedth2v 4592. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 28-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜏    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	dedth4v 4594	Weak deduction theorem for eliminating a hypothesis with 4 class variables. See comments in dedth2v 4592. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 28-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝑆) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝑇) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝐷 = if(𝜑, 𝐷, 𝑈) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ 𝜂    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	elimhyp 4595	Eliminate a hypothesis containing class variable 𝐴 when it is known for a specific class 𝐵. For more information, see comments in dedth 4588. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜒    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	elimhyp2v 4596	Eliminate a hypothesis containing 2 class variables. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐷) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐶) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝐷 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐷) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ 𝜏    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜃
Theorem	elimhyp3v 4597	Eliminate a hypothesis containing 3 class variables. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝐷 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝑅 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜎))    &   ⊢ (𝑆 = if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜂    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜏
Theorem	elimhyp4v 4598	Eliminate a hypothesis containing 4 class variables (for use with the weak deduction theorem dedth 4588). (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝐶 = if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝐹 = if(𝜑, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝐷 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐷) → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝑅 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝑅) → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜎))    &   ⊢ (𝑆 = if(𝜑, 𝐶, 𝑆) → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜌))    &   ⊢ (𝐺 = if(𝜑, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜂    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	elimel 4599	Eliminate a membership hypothesis for weak deduction theorem, when special case 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 is provable. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ if(𝐴 ∈ 𝐶, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶
Theorem	elimdhyp 4600	Version of elimhyp 4595 where the hypothesis is deduced from the final antecedent. See divalg 16436 for an example of its use. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 25-Mar-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ 𝜃    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜒