Theorem dfpart2 39335

Description: Alternate definition of the partition predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfpart2	⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem dfpart2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-part 39332	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴))
2		df-dmqs 39186	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴 ↔ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴)
3	2	anbi2i 632	. 2 ⊢ (( Disj 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴) ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴))
4	1, 3	bitri 277	1 ⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1559  dom cdm 5645   / cqs 8672   DomainQs wdmqs 38670   Disj wdisjALTV 38682   Part wpart 38687

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-dmqs 39186  df-part 39332

This theorem is referenced by:  parteq1  39340  parteq2  39341  partim  39374  pet0  39381  petid  39383  petidres  39385  petinidres  39387  petxrnidres  39389  petincnvepres  39426  pet  39428