| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 383 of 511) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31521) |
(31522-33044) |
(33045-51066) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Definition | df-bj-onehalf 38201 |
Define the temporary real "one-half". Once the machinery is
developed,
the real number "one-half" is commonly denoted by (1 / 2).
(Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
TODO: $p |- 1/2 e. R. $= ? $. (riotacl 7394) $p |- -. 0R = 1/2 $= ? $. (since -. ( 0R +R 0R ) = 1R ) $p |- 0R <R 1/2 $= ? $. $p |- 1/2 <R 1R $= ? $. $p |- ( {R ` 0R ) = 0R $= ? $. $p |- ( {R ` 1/2 ) = 1/2 $= ? $. df-minfty $a |- minfty = ( inftyexpitau ` <. 1/2 , 0R >. ) $. |
| ⊢ 1/2R = (℩𝑥 ∈ R (𝑥 +R 𝑥) = 1R) | ||
| Theorem | bj-inftyexpitaudisj 38202 | An element of the circle at infinity is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ ¬ (+∞eiτ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ | ||
| Syntax | cinftyexpi 38203 | Syntax for the function +∞ei parameterizing ℂ∞. |
| class +∞ei | ||
| Definition | df-bj-inftyexpi 38204 | Definition of the auxiliary function +∞ei parameterizing the circle at infinity ℂ∞ in ℂ̅. We use coupling with ℂ to simplify the proof of bj-ccinftydisj 38210. It could seem more natural to define +∞ei on all of ℝ, but we want to use only basic functions in the definition of ℂ̅. TODO: transition to df-bj-inftyexpitau 38196 instead. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ +∞ei = (𝑥 ∈ ( -π(,]π) ↦ 〈𝑥, ℂ〉) | ||
| Theorem | bj-inftyexpiinv 38205 | Utility theorem for the inverse of +∞ei. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( -π(,]π) → (1st ‘(+∞ei‘𝐴)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | bj-inftyexpiinj 38206 | Injectivity of the parameterization +∞ei. Remark: a more conceptual proof would use bj-inftyexpiinv 38205 and the fact that a function with a retraction is injective. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ( -π(,]π) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ( -π(,]π)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (+∞ei‘𝐴) = (+∞ei‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-inftyexpidisj 38207 | An element of the circle at infinity is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ¬ (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ | ||
| Syntax | cccinfty 38208 | Syntax for the circle at infinity ℂ∞. |
| class ℂ∞ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-ccinfty 38209 | Definition of the circle at infinity ℂ∞. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ℂ∞ = ran +∞ei | ||
| Theorem | bj-ccinftydisj 38210 | The circle at infinity is disjoint from the set of complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (ℂ ∩ ℂ∞) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | bj-elccinfty 38211 | A lemma for infinite extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( -π(,]π) → (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ∞) | ||
| Syntax | cccbar 38212 | Syntax for the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅. |
| class ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-ccbar 38213 | Definition of the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℂ̅ = (ℂ ∪ ℂ∞) | ||
| Theorem | bj-ccssccbar 38214 | Complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℂ ⊆ ℂ̅ | ||
| Theorem | bj-ccinftyssccbar 38215 | Infinite extended complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℂ∞ ⊆ ℂ̅ | ||
| Syntax | cpinfty 38216 | Syntax for "plus infinity". |
| class +∞ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-pinfty 38217 | Definition of "plus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ +∞ = (+∞ei‘0) | ||
| Theorem | bj-pinftyccb 38218 | The class +∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ +∞ ∈ ℂ̅ | ||
| Theorem | bj-pinftynrr 38219 | The extended complex number +∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ¬ +∞ ∈ ℂ | ||
| Syntax | cminfty 38220 | Syntax for "minus infinity". |
| class -∞ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-minfty 38221 | Definition of "minus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ -∞ = (+∞ei‘π) | ||
| Theorem | bj-minftyccb 38222 | The class -∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ -∞ ∈ ℂ̅ | ||
| Theorem | bj-minftynrr 38223 | The extended complex number -∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ¬ -∞ ∈ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | bj-pinftynminfty 38224 | The extended complex numbers +∞ and -∞ are different. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞ | ||
| Syntax | crrbar 38225 | Syntax for the set of extended real numbers. |
| class ℝ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-rrbar 38226 | Definition of the set of extended real numbers. This aims to replace df-xr 11348. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ̅ = (ℝ ∪ {-∞, +∞}) | ||
| Syntax | cinfty 38227 | Syntax for ∞. |
| class ∞ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-infty 38228 | Definition of ∞, the point at infinity of the real or complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∞ = 𝒫 ∪ ℂ | ||
| Syntax | ccchat 38229 | Syntax for ℂ̂. |
| class ℂ̂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-cchat 38230 | Define the complex projective line, or Riemann sphere. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℂ̂ = (ℂ ∪ {∞}) | ||
| Syntax | crrhat 38231 | Syntax for ℝ̂. |
| class ℝ̂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-rrhat 38232 | Define the real projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ̂ = (ℝ ∪ {∞}) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rrhatsscchat 38233 | The real projective line is included in the complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ̂ ⊆ ℂ̂ | ||
We define the operations of addition and opposite on the extended complex numbers and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) simultaneously, thus "overloading" the operations. | ||
| Syntax | caddcc 38234 | Syntax for the addition on extended complex numbers. |
| class +ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-addc 38235 | Define the additions on the extended complex numbers (on the subset of (ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) where it makes sense) and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). We use the plural in "additions" since these are two different operations, even though +ℂ̅ is overloaded. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ +ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (((ℂ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̅ × ℂ)) ∪ ((ℂ̂ × ℂ̂) ∪ ( I ↾ ℂ∞))) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, if((2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, 〈((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))), ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥)))〉, (2nd ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Syntax | coppcc 38236 | Syntax for negation on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). |
| class -ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-oppc 38237* | Define the negation (operation giving the opposite) on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ -ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = ∞, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 +ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 0), (+∞eiτ‘(𝑥 +ℂ̅ 〈1/2R, 0R〉))))) | ||
In this section, we redefine df-ltxr 11349 without the intermediate step of df-lt 11214. | ||
| Syntax | cltxr 38238 | Syntax for the standard (strict) order on the extended reals. |
| class <ℝ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-lt 38239* | Define the standard (strict) order on the extended reals. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ <ℝ̅ = ({𝑥 ∈ (ℝ̅ × ℝ̅) ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(((1st ‘𝑥) = 〈𝑦, 0R〉 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) = 〈𝑧, 0R〉) ∧ 𝑦 <R 𝑧)} ∪ ((({-∞} × ℝ) ∪ (ℝ × {+∞})) ∪ ({-∞} × {+∞}))) | ||
Since one needs arguments in order to define multiplication in ℂ̅, and one needs complex multiplication in order to define arguments, it would be contrived to construct a whole theory for a temporary multiplication (and temporary powers, then temporary logarithm, and finally temporary argument) before redefining the extended complex multiplication. Therefore, we adopt a two-step process, see df-bj-mulc 38243. | ||
| Syntax | carg 38240 | Syntax for the argument of a nonzero extended complex number. |
| class Arg | ||
| Definition | df-bj-arg 38241 | Define the argument of a nonzero extended complex number. By convention, it has values in ( -π, π]. Another convention chooses values in [0, 2π) but the present convention simplifies formulas giving the argument as an arctangent. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The "else" case of the second conditional operator, corresponding to infinite extended complex numbers other than -∞, gives a definition depending on the specific definition chosen for these numbers (df-bj-inftyexpitau 38196), and therefore should not be relied upon. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Arg = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∖ {0}) ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (ℑ‘(log‘𝑥)), if(𝑥<ℝ̅0, π, (((1st ‘𝑥) / (2 · π)) − π)))) | ||
| Syntax | cmulc 38242 | Syntax for the multiplication of extended complex numbers. |
| class ·ℂ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-mulc 38243 |
Define the multiplication of extended complex numbers and of the complex
projective line (Riemann sphere). In our convention, a product with 0 is
0, even when the other factor is infinite. An alternate convention leaves
products of 0 with an infinite number undefined since the multiplication
is not continuous at these points. This convention entails
(0 / 0) = 0 (given df-bj-invc 38245).
This definition uses · and Arg and /. Indeed, it would be contrived to bypass ordinary complex multiplication, and the present two-step definition looks like a good compromise. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ·ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = 0 ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = 0), 0, if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ (ℂ × ℂ), ((1st ‘𝑥) · (2nd ‘𝑥)), (+∞eiτ‘(((Arg‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +ℂ̅ (Arg‘(2nd ‘𝑥))) / τ)))))) | ||
| Syntax | cinvc 38244 | Syntax for the inverse of nonzero extended complex numbers. |
| class ·-1 | ||
| Definition | df-bj-invc 38245* | Define inversion, which maps a nonzero extended complex number or element of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) to its inverse. Beware of the overloading: the equality (·-1‘0) = ∞ is to be understood in the complex projective line, but 0 as an extended complex number does not have an inverse, which we can state as (·-1‘0) ∉ ℂ̅. This definition relies on df-bj-mulc 38243, which does not bypass ordinary complex multiplication, but defines extended complex multiplication on top of it. Therefore, we could have used directly / instead of (℩... ·ℂ̅ ...). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ·-1 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 ·ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 1), 0))) | ||
| Syntax | ciomnn 38246 | Syntax for the canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}). |
| class iω↪ℕ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-iomnn 38247* |
Definition of the canonical bijection from (ω ∪
{ω}) onto
(ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}).
To understand this definition, recall that set.mm constructs reals as couples whose first component is a prereal and second component is the zero prereal (in order that one have ℝ ⊆ ℂ), that prereals are equivalence classes of couples of positive reals, the latter are Dedekind cuts of positive rationals, which are equivalence classes of positive ordinals. In partiular, we take the successor ordinal at the beginning and subtract 1 at the end since the intermediate systems contain only (strictly) positive numbers. Note the similarity with df-bj-fractemp 38194 but we did not use the present definition there since we wanted to have defined +∞ first. See bj-iomnnom 38256 for its value at +∞. TODO: Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘∅) = 0. Define ⊢ ℕ0 = (iω↪ℕ “ ω) and ⊢ ℕ = (ℕ0 ∖ {0}). Prove ⊢ iω↪ℕ:(ω ∪ {ω})–1-1-onto→(ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) and ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω):ω–1-1-onto→ℕ0. Prove that these bijections are respectively an isomorphism of ordered "extended rigs" and of ordered rigs. Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω) = rec((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0). (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ iω↪ℕ = ((𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ 〈[〈{𝑟 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑟 <Q 〈suc 𝑛, 1o〉}, 1P〉] ~R , 0R〉) ∪ {〈ω, +∞〉}) | ||
| Theorem | bj-imafv 38248 | If the direct image of a singleton under any of two functions is the same, then the values of these functions at the corresponding point agree. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 “ {𝐴}) = (𝐺 “ {𝐴}) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-funun 38249 | Value of a function expressed as a union of two functions at a point not in the domain of one of them. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fununsn1 38250 | Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point not equal to the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {〈𝐵, 𝐶〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fununsn2 38251 | Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {〈𝐵, 𝐶〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvsnun1 38252 | The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at arguments other than the replaced one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form and remove two sethood hypotheses. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐷) = (𝐹‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvsnun2 38253 | The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at the replaced ordered pair. See also fvsnun2 7188. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {〈𝐴, 𝐵〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐴) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvmptunsn1 38254* | Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {〈𝐶, 𝐷〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvmptunsn2 38255* | Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point in the domain of the mapsto construction. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {〈𝐶, 𝐷〉})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐸) → 𝐵 = 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐸) = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | bj-iomnnom 38256 | The canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) maps ω to +∞. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘ω) = +∞ | ||
| Syntax | cnnbar 38257 | Syntax for the extended natural numbers. |
| class ℕ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-nnbar 38258 | Definition of the extended natural numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℕ̅ = (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) | ||
| Syntax | czzbar 38259 | Syntax for the extended integers. |
| class ℤ̅ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-zzbar 38260 | Definition of the extended integers. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℤ̅ = (ℤ ∪ {-∞, +∞}) | ||
| Syntax | czzhat 38261 | Syntax for the one-point-compactified integers. |
| class ℤ̂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-zzhat 38262 | Definition of the one-point-compactified. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ℤ̂ = (ℤ ∪ {∞}) | ||
| Syntax | cdivc 38263 | Syntax for the divisibility relation. |
| class ∥ℂ | ||
| Definition | df-bj-divc 38264* |
Definition of the divisibility relation (compare df-dvds 16424).
Since 0 is absorbing, ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) → (𝐴 ∥ℂ 0)) and ⊢ ((0 ∥ℂ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 = 0). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ∥ℂ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ̅ ∪ ℤ̂)(𝑛 ·ℂ̅ 𝑥) = 𝑦)} | ||
See ccmn 19995 and subsequents. The first few statements of this subsection can be put very early after ccmn 19995. Proposal: in the main part, make separate subsections of commutative monoids and abelian groups. Relabel cabl 19996 to "cabl" or, preferably, other labels containing "abl" to "abel", for consistency. | ||
| Theorem | bj-smgrpssmgm 38265 | Semigroups are magmas. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Smgrp ⊆ Mgm | ||
| Theorem | bj-smgrpssmgmel 38266 | Semigroups are magmas (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 12-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Smgrp → 𝐺 ∈ Mgm) | ||
| Theorem | bj-mndsssmgrp 38267 | Monoids are semigroups. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Mnd ⊆ Smgrp | ||
| Theorem | bj-mndsssmgrpel 38268 | Monoids are semigroups (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Mnd → 𝐺 ∈ Smgrp) | ||
| Theorem | bj-cmnssmnd 38269 | Commutative monoids are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ CMnd ⊆ Mnd | ||
| Theorem | bj-cmnssmndel 38270 | Commutative monoids are monoids (elemental version). This is a more direct proof of cmnmnd 20012, which relies on iscmn 20004. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ CMnd → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd) | ||
| Theorem | bj-grpssmnd 38271 | Groups are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Grp ⊆ Mnd | ||
| Theorem | bj-grpssmndel 38272 | Groups are monoids (elemental version). Shorter proof of grpmnd 19152. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Grp → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd) | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablssgrp 38273 | Abelian groups are groups. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Abel ⊆ Grp | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablssgrpel 38274 | Abelian groups are groups (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablgrp 20000. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablsscmn 38275 | Abelian groups are commutative monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Abel ⊆ CMnd | ||
| Theorem | bj-ablsscmnel 38276 | Abelian groups are commutative monoids (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablcmn 20002. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd) | ||
| Theorem | bj-modssabl 38277 | (The additive groups of) modules are abelian groups. (The elemental version is lmodabl 21185; see also lmodgrp 21143 and lmodcmn 21186.) (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ LMod ⊆ Abel | ||
| Theorem | bj-vecssmod 38278 | Vector spaces are modules. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ LVec ⊆ LMod | ||
| Theorem | bj-vecssmodel 38279 | Vector spaces are modules (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of lveclmod 21382. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ LVec → 𝐴 ∈ LMod) | ||
UPDATE: a similar summation is already defined as df-gsum 17614 (although it mixes finite and infinite sums, which makes it harder to understand). | ||
| Syntax | cfinsum 38280 | Syntax for the class "finite summation in monoids". |
| class FinSum | ||
| Definition | df-bj-finsum 38281* | Finite summation in commutative monoids. This finite summation function can be extended to pairs 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 where 𝑦 is a left-unital magma and 𝑧 is defined on a totally ordered set (choosing left-associative composition), or dropping unitality and requiring nonempty families, or on any monoids for families of permutable elements, etc. We use the term "summation", even though the definition stands for any unital, commutative and associative composition law. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ FinSum = (𝑥 ∈ {〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ CMnd ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ Fin 𝑧:𝑡⟶(Base‘𝑦))} ↦ (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→dom (2nd ‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑥)‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘𝑚)))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-finsumval0 38282* | Value of a finite sum. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-May-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐼⟶(Base‘𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 FinSum 𝐵) = (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐼 ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘𝐴), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝐵‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘(♯‘𝐼))))) | ||
A few basic theorems to start affine, Euclidean, and Cartesian geometry. The first step is to define real vector spaces, then barycentric coordinates and convex hulls. | ||
In this section, we introduce real vector spaces. | ||
| Theorem | bj-fvimacnv0 38283 | Variant of fvimacnv 7052 where membership of 𝐴 in the domain is not needed provided the containing class 𝐵 does not contain the empty set. This antecedent would not be needed with Definition df-afv 48266. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isvec 38284 | The predicate "is a vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Scalar‘𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ LVec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐾 ∈ DivRing))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fldssdrng 38285 | Fields are division rings. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ Field ⊆ DivRing | ||
| Theorem | bj-flddrng 38286 | Fields are division rings (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ Field → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rrdrg 38287 | The field of real numbers is a division ring. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝfld ∈ DivRing | ||
| Theorem | bj-isclm 38288 | The predicate "is a subcomplex module". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))) | ||
| Syntax | crrvec 38289 | Syntax for the class of real vector spaces. |
| class ℝ-Vec | ||
| Definition | df-bj-rvec 38290 | Definition of the class of real vector spaces. The previous definition, ⊢ ℝ-Vec = {𝑥 ∈ LMod ∣ (Scalar‘𝑥) = ℝfld}, can be recovered using bj-isrvec 38291. The present one is preferred since it does not use any dummy variable. That ℝ-Vec could be defined with LVec in place of LMod is a consequence of bj-isrvec2 38297. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec = (LMod ∩ (◡Scalar “ {ℝfld})) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvec 38291 | The predicate "is a real vector space". Using df-sca 17445 instead of scaid 17487 shortens the proof by two syntactic steps, but it is preferable not to rely on the precise definition df-sca 17445. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑉) = ℝfld)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecmod 38292 | Real vector spaces are modules (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ LMod) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecssmod 38293 | Real vector spaces are modules. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ LMod | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecrr 38294 | The field of scalars of a real vector space is the field of real numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → (Scalar‘𝑉) = ℝfld) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvecd 38295 | The predicate "is a real vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Scalar‘𝑉) = 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐾 = ℝfld))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecvec 38296 | Real vector spaces are vector spaces (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ LVec) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvec2 38297 | The predicate "is a real vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Scalar‘𝑉) = 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝐾 = ℝfld))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecssvec 38298 | Real vector spaces are vector spaces. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ LVec | ||
| Theorem | bj-rveccmod 38299 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex modules (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ ℂMod) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecsscmod 38300 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex modules. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ ℂMod | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |