Theorem dfsb7OLDOLD 2570

Description: Obsolete version of dfsb7 2285 as of 8-Jul-2023.

An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 2070. By introducing a dummy variable 𝑧 in the definiens, we are able to eliminate any distinct variable restrictions among the variables 𝑥, 𝑦, and 𝜑 of the definiendum. No distinct variable conflicts arise because 𝑧 effectively insulates 𝑥 from 𝑦. To achieve this, we use a chain of two substitutions in the form of sb5 2276, first 𝑧 for 𝑥 then 𝑦 for 𝑧. Compare Definition 2.1'' of [Quine] p. 17, which is obtained from this theorem by applying df-clab 2800. Theorem sb7h 2569 provides a version where 𝜑 and 𝑧 don't have to be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfsb7OLDOLD	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem dfsb7OLDOLD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1915	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
2	1	sb7f 2568	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398  ∃wex 1780  [wsb 2069

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-13 2390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070

This theorem is referenced by: (None)