Theorem exbiriVD 44825

Description: Virtual deduction proof of exbiri 810. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

h1::	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
2::	⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜑   )
3::	⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜓   )
4::	⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜃   )
5:2,1,?: e10 44665	⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))   )
6:3,5,?: e21 44701	⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   )
7:4,6,?: e32 44729	⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜒   )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   (𝜃 → 𝜒)   )
9:8:	⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))   )
qed:9:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
exbiriVD.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
exbiriVD	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))

Proof of Theorem exbiriVD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idn3 44586	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜃   )
2		idn2 44584	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜓   )
3		idn1 44545	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜑   )
4		exbiriVD.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
5		pm3.3 448	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))))
6	5	com12 32	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))))
7	3, 4, 6	e10 44665	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))   )
8		pm2.27 42	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))
9	2, 7, 8	e21 44701	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   )
10		biimpr 220	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → 𝜒))
11	10	com12 32	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜃 → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → 𝜒))
12	1, 9, 11	e32 44729	. . . 4 ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜒   )
13	12	in3 44580	. . 3 ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   (𝜃 → 𝜒)   )
14	13	in2 44576	. 2 ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))   )
15	14	in1 44542	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-3an 1089  df-vd1 44541  df-vd2 44549  df-vd3 44561

This theorem is referenced by: (None)