Theorem ifor 4509

Description: Rewrite a disjunction in a conditional as two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ifor	⊢ if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem ifor

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		iftrue 4460	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴)
2	1	orcs 881	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴)
3		iftrue 4460	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) = 𝐴)
4	2, 3	eqtr4d 2777	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)))
5		iffalse 4463	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) = if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))
6		biorf 942	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
7	6	ifbid 4478	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵))
8	5, 7	eqtr2d 2775	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)))
9	4, 8	pm2.61i 183	1 ⊢ if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∨ wo 853   = wceq 1547  ifcif 4454

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-if 4455

This theorem is referenced by:  cantnflem1d  9600  cantnflem1  9601