Theorem ifor 4359

Description: Rewrite a disjunction in a conditional as two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ifor	⊢ if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem ifor

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		iftrue 4313	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴)
2	1	orcs 864	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴)
3		iftrue 4313	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) = 𝐴)
4	2, 3	eqtr4d 2817	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)))
5		iffalse 4316	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) = if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))
6		biorf 923	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
7	6	ifbid 4329	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵))
8	5, 7	eqtr2d 2815	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)))
9	4, 8	pm2.61i 177	1 ⊢ if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∨ wo 836   = wceq 1601  ifcif 4307

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1839  ax-4 1853  ax-5 1953  ax-6 2021  ax-7 2055  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2135  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2754

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 837  df-tru 1605  df-ex 1824  df-nf 1828  df-sb 2012  df-clab 2764  df-cleq 2770  df-clel 2774  df-if 4308

This theorem is referenced by:  cantnflem1d  8884  cantnflem1  8885