| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ifor | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Rewrite a disjunction in a conditional as two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ifor | ⊢ if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | iftrue 4476 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) | |
| 2 | 1 | orcs 875 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) |
| 3 | iftrue 4476 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) = 𝐴) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | eqtr4d 2769 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))) |
| 5 | iffalse 4479 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) = if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) | |
| 6 | biorf 936 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | |
| 7 | 6 | ifbid 4494 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵)) |
| 8 | 5, 7 | eqtr2d 2767 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))) |
| 9 | 4, 8 | pm2.61i 182 | 1 ⊢ if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ∨ wo 847 = wceq 1541 ifcif 4470 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-ext 2703 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-ex 1781 df-sb 2068 df-clab 2710 df-cleq 2723 df-clel 2806 df-if 4471 |
| This theorem is referenced by: cantnflem1d 9573 cantnflem1 9574 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |