Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Peter Mazsa < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  inex3 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem inex3 39410
Description: Sufficient condition for the intersection relation to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2019.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
inex3 ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem inex3
StepHypRef Expression
1 inex1g 5282 . 2 (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
2 inex2g 5283 . 2 (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
31, 2jaoi 871 1 ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 861   ∈ wcel 2146  Vcvv 3453   ∩ cin 4091
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5251
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2101  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-rab 3416  df-v 3455  df-in 4093
This theorem is used by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator