Theorem inex3 38583

Description: Sufficient condition for the intersection relation to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inex3	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem inex3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inex1g 5266	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
2		inex2g 5267	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
3	1, 2	jaoi 858	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 848   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3442   ∩ cin 3902

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5243

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-in 3910

This theorem is referenced by: (None)