Theorem inex3 35589

Description: Sufficient condition for the intersection relation to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inex3	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem inex3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inex1g 5215	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
2		inex2g 5216	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
3	1, 2	jaoi 853	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 843   ∈ wcel 2110  Vcvv 3494   ∩ cin 3934

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5195

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-in 3942

This theorem is referenced by: (None)