Theorem inex3 38294

Description: Sufficient condition for the intersection relation to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inex3	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem inex3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inex1g 5337	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
2		inex2g 5338	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
3	1, 2	jaoi 856	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 846   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3488   ∩ cin 3975

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1778  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-in 3983

This theorem is referenced by: (None)