P. 376 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 37501-37600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bj-opelopabid 37501*	Membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction. One can remove the DV condition on 𝑥, 𝑦 by using opabid 5480 in place of opabidw 5479. (Contributed by BJ, 22-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	bj-opabco 37502*	Composition of ordered-pair class abstractions. (Contributed by BJ, 22-May-2024.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∘ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	bj-xpcossxp 37503	The composition of two Cartesian products is included in the expected Cartesian product. There is equality if (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅, see xpcogend 14936. (Contributed by BJ, 22-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐷)
Theorem	bj-imdirco 37504	Functorial property of the direct image: the direct image by a composition is the composition of the direct images. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝒫*𝐶)‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑅)) = (((𝐵𝒫*𝐶)‘𝑆) ∘ ((𝐴𝒫*𝐵)‘𝑅)))
Syntax	ciminv 37505	Syntax for the functionalized inverse image.
class 𝒫*
Definition	df-iminv 37506*	Definition of the functionalized inverse image, which maps a binary relation between two given sets to its associated inverse image relation. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.)
⊢ 𝒫* = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑎 × 𝑏) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑏) ∧ 𝑥 = (◡𝑟 “ 𝑦))}))
Theorem	bj-iminvval 37507*	Value of the functionalized inverse image. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝒫*𝐵) = (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 = (◡𝑟 “ 𝑦))}))
Theorem	bj-iminvval2 37508*	Value of the functionalized inverse image. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝒫*𝐵)‘𝑅) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 = (◡𝑅 “ 𝑦))})
Theorem	bj-iminvid 37509	Functorial property of the inverse image: the inverse image by the identity on a set is the identity on the powerset. (Contributed by BJ, 26-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝒫*𝐴)‘( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝒫 𝐴))
21.19.6.5  Extended numbers and projective lines as sets We parameterize the set of infinite extended complex numbers ℂ∞ (df-bj-ccinfty 37526) using the real numbers ℝ (df-r 11048) via the function +∞eiτ. Since at that point, we have only defined the set of real numbers but no operations on it, we define a temporary "fractional part" function, which is more convenient to define on the temporary reals R (df-nr 10979) since we can use operations on the latter. We also define the temporary real "one-half" in order to define minus infinity (df-bj-minfty 37538) and then we can define the sets of extended real numbers and of extended complex numbers, and the projective real and complex lines, as well as addition and negation on these, and also the order relation on the extended reals (which bypasses the intermediate definition of a temporary order on the real numbers and then a superseding one on the extended real numbers).
Syntax	cfractemp 37510	Syntax for the fractional part of a temporary real.
class {R
Definition	df-bj-fractemp 37511*	Temporary definition: fractional part of a temporary real. To understand this definition, recall the canonical injection ω⟶R, 𝑛 ↦ [{𝑥 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑥 <Q ⟨suc 𝑛, 1o⟩}, 1P] ~R where we successively take the successor of 𝑛 to land in positive integers, then take the couple with 1o as second component to land in positive rationals, then take the Dedekind cut that positive rational forms, and finally take the equivalence class of the couple with 1P as second component. Adding one at the beginning and subtracting it at the end is necessary since the constructions used in set.mm use the positive integers, positive rationals, and positive reals as intermediate number systems. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jan-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. One could even inline it. The definitive fractional part of an extended or projective complex number will be defined later. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ {R = (𝑥 ∈ R ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ R ((𝑦 = 0R ∨ (0R <R 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 <R 1R)) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω ([⟨{𝑧 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑧 <Q ⟨suc 𝑛, 1o⟩}, 1P⟩] ~R +R 𝑦) = 𝑥)))
Syntax	cinftyexpitau 37512	Syntax for the function +∞eiτ parameterizing ℂ∞.
class +∞eiτ
Definition	df-bj-inftyexpitau 37513	Definition of the auxiliary function +∞eiτ parameterizing the circle at infinity ℂ∞ in ℂ̅. We use coupling with {R} to simplify the proof of bj-inftyexpitaudisj 37519. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jan-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. TODO: prove only the necessary lemmas to prove ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((+∞eiτ‘𝐴) = (+∞eiτ‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℤ)). (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +∞eiτ = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⟨({R‘(1st ‘𝑥)), {R}⟩)
Syntax	cccinftyN 37514	Syntax for the circle at infinity ℂ∞N.
class ℂ∞N
Definition	df-bj-ccinftyN 37515	Definition of the circle at infinity ℂ∞N. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ∞N = ran +∞eiτ
Theorem	bj-inftyexpitaufo 37516	The function +∞eiτ written as a surjection with domain and range. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ +∞eiτ:ℝ–onto→ℂ∞N
Syntax	chalf 37517	Syntax for the temporary one-half.
class 1/2
Definition	df-bj-onehalf 37518	Define the temporary real "one-half". Once the machinery is developed, the real number "one-half" is commonly denoted by (1 / 2). (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.) TODO: $p |- 1/2 e. R. $= ? $. (riotacl 7341) $p |- -. 0R = 1/2 $= ? $. (since -. ( 0R +R 0R ) = 1R ) $p |- 0R <R 1/2 $= ? $. $p |- 1/2 <R 1R $= ? $. $p |- ( {R ` 0R ) = 0R $= ? $. $p |- ( {R ` 1/2 ) = 1/2 $= ? $. df-minfty $a |- minfty = ( inftyexpitau ` <. 1/2 , 0R >. ) $.
⊢ 1/2 = (℩𝑥 ∈ R (𝑥 +R 𝑥) = 1R)
Theorem	bj-inftyexpitaudisj 37519	An element of the circle at infinity is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ ¬ (+∞eiτ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ
Syntax	cinftyexpi 37520	Syntax for the function +∞ei parameterizing ℂ∞.
class +∞ei
Definition	df-bj-inftyexpi 37521	Definition of the auxiliary function +∞ei parameterizing the circle at infinity ℂ∞ in ℂ̅. We use coupling with ℂ to simplify the proof of bj-ccinftydisj 37527. It could seem more natural to define +∞ei on all of ℝ, but we want to use only basic functions in the definition of ℂ̅. TODO: transition to df-bj-inftyexpitau 37513 instead. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +∞ei = (𝑥 ∈ (-π(,]π) ↦ ⟨𝑥, ℂ⟩)
Theorem	bj-inftyexpiinv 37522	Utility theorem for the inverse of +∞ei. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) → (1st ‘(+∞ei‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-inftyexpiinj 37523	Injectivity of the parameterization +∞ei. Remark: a more conceptual proof would use bj-inftyexpiinv 37522 and the fact that a function with a retraction is injective. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (-π(,]π)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (+∞ei‘𝐴) = (+∞ei‘𝐵)))
Theorem	bj-inftyexpidisj 37524	An element of the circle at infinity is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ
Syntax	cccinfty 37525	Syntax for the circle at infinity ℂ∞.
class ℂ∞
Definition	df-bj-ccinfty 37526	Definition of the circle at infinity ℂ∞. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ∞ = ran +∞ei
Theorem	bj-ccinftydisj 37527	The circle at infinity is disjoint from the set of complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (ℂ ∩ ℂ∞) = ∅
Theorem	bj-elccinfty 37528	A lemma for infinite extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) → (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ∞)
Syntax	cccbar 37529	Syntax for the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅.
class ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-ccbar 37530	Definition of the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ̅ = (ℂ ∪ ℂ∞)
Theorem	bj-ccssccbar 37531	Complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ ⊆ ℂ̅
Theorem	bj-ccinftyssccbar 37532	Infinite extended complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ∞ ⊆ ℂ̅
Syntax	cpinfty 37533	Syntax for "plus infinity".
class +∞
Definition	df-bj-pinfty 37534	Definition of "plus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +∞ = (+∞ei‘0)
Theorem	bj-pinftyccb 37535	The class +∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +∞ ∈ ℂ̅
Theorem	bj-pinftynrr 37536	The extended complex number +∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ¬ +∞ ∈ ℂ
Syntax	cminfty 37537	Syntax for "minus infinity".
class -∞
Definition	df-bj-minfty 37538	Definition of "minus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -∞ = (+∞ei‘π)
Theorem	bj-minftyccb 37539	The class -∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -∞ ∈ ℂ̅
Theorem	bj-minftynrr 37540	The extended complex number -∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ¬ -∞ ∈ ℂ
Theorem	bj-pinftynminfty 37541	The extended complex numbers +∞ and -∞ are different. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞
Syntax	crrbar 37542	Syntax for the set of extended real numbers.
class ℝ̅
Definition	df-bj-rrbar 37543	Definition of the set of extended real numbers. This aims to replace df-xr 11183. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ̅ = (ℝ ∪ {-∞, +∞})
Syntax	cinfty 37544	Syntax for ∞.
class ∞
Definition	df-bj-infty 37545	Definition of ∞, the point at infinity of the real or complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∞ = 𝒫 ∪ ℂ
Syntax	ccchat 37546	Syntax for ℂ̂.
class ℂ̂
Definition	df-bj-cchat 37547	Define the complex projective line, or Riemann sphere. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ̂ = (ℂ ∪ {∞})
Syntax	crrhat 37548	Syntax for ℝ̂.
class ℝ̂
Definition	df-bj-rrhat 37549	Define the real projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ̂ = (ℝ ∪ {∞})
Theorem	bj-rrhatsscchat 37550	The real projective line is included in the complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ̂ ⊆ ℂ̂
21.19.6.6  Addition and opposite We define the operations of addition and opposite on the extended complex numbers and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) simultaneously, thus "overloading" the operations.
Syntax	caddcc 37551	Syntax for the addition on extended complex numbers.
class +ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-addc 37552	Define the additions on the extended complex numbers (on the subset of (ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) where it makes sense) and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). We use the plural in "additions" since these are two different operations, even though +ℂ̅ is overloaded. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (((ℂ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̅ × ℂ)) ∪ ((ℂ̂ × ℂ̂) ∪ ( I ↾ ℂ∞))) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, if((2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, ⟨((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))), ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥)))⟩, (2nd ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘𝑥))))
Syntax	coppcc 37553	Syntax for negation on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere).
class -ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-oppc 37554*	Define the negation (operation giving the opposite) on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = ∞, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 +ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 0), (+∞eiτ‘(𝑥 +ℂ̅ ⟨1/2, 0R⟩)))))
21.19.6.7  Order relation on the extended reals In this section, we redefine df-ltxr 11184 without the intermediate step of df-lt 11051.
Syntax	cltxr 37555	Syntax for the standard (strict) order on the extended reals.
class <ℝ̅
Definition	df-bj-lt 37556*	Define the standard (strict) order on the extended reals. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ <ℝ̅ = ({𝑥 ∈ (ℝ̅ × ℝ̅) ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(((1st ‘𝑥) = ⟨𝑦, 0R⟩ ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩) ∧ 𝑦 <R 𝑧)} ∪ ((({-∞} × ℝ) ∪ (ℝ × {+∞})) ∪ ({-∞} × {+∞})))
21.19.6.8  Argument, multiplication and inverse Since one needs arguments in order to define multiplication in ℂ̅, and one needs complex multiplication in order to define arguments, it would be contrived to construct a whole theory for a temporary multiplication (and temporary powers, then temporary logarithm, and finally temporary argument) before redefining the extended complex multiplication. Therefore, we adopt a two-step process, see df-bj-mulc 37560.
Syntax	carg 37557	Syntax for the argument of a nonzero extended complex number.
class Arg
Definition	df-bj-arg 37558	Define the argument of a nonzero extended complex number. By convention, it has values in (-π, π]. Another convention chooses values in [0, 2π) but the present convention simplifies formulas giving the argument as an arctangent. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The "else" case of the second conditional operator, corresponding to infinite extended complex numbers other than -∞, gives a definition depending on the specific definition chosen for these numbers (df-bj-inftyexpitau 37513), and therefore should not be relied upon. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Arg = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∖ {0}) ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (ℑ‘(log‘𝑥)), if(𝑥<ℝ̅0, π, (((1st ‘𝑥) / (2 · π)) − π))))
Syntax	cmulc 37559	Syntax for the multiplication of extended complex numbers.
class ·ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-mulc 37560	Define the multiplication of extended complex numbers and of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). In our convention, a product with 0 is 0, even when the other factor is infinite. An alternate convention leaves products of 0 with an infinite number undefined since the multiplication is not continuous at these points. Note that our convention entails (0 / 0) = 0 (given df-bj-invc 37562). Note that this definition uses · and Arg and /. Indeed, it would be contrived to bypass ordinary complex multiplication, and the present two-step definition looks like a good compromise. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ·ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = 0 ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = 0), 0, if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ (ℂ × ℂ), ((1st ‘𝑥) · (2nd ‘𝑥)), (+∞eiτ‘(((Arg‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +ℂ̅ (Arg‘(2nd ‘𝑥))) / τ))))))
Syntax	cinvc 37561	Syntax for the inverse of nonzero extended complex numbers.
class -1ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-invc 37562*	Define inversion, which maps a nonzero extended complex number or element of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) to its inverse. Beware of the overloading: the equality (-1ℂ̅‘0) = ∞ is to be understood in the complex projective line, but 0 as an extended complex number does not have an inverse, which we can state as (-1ℂ̅‘0) ∉ ℂ̅. Note that this definition relies on df-bj-mulc 37560, which does not bypass ordinary complex multiplication, but defines extended complex multiplication on top of it. Therefore, we could have used directly / instead of (℩... ·ℂ̅ ...). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -1ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 ·ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 1), 0)))
21.19.6.9  The canonical bijection from the finite ordinals
Syntax	ciomnn 37563	Syntax for the canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}).
class iω↪ℕ
Definition	df-bj-iomnn 37564*	Definition of the canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}). To understand this definition, recall that set.mm constructs reals as couples whose first component is a prereal and second component is the zero prereal (in order that one have ℝ ⊆ ℂ), that prereals are equivalence classes of couples of positive reals, the latter are Dedekind cuts of positive rationals, which are equivalence classes of positive ordinals. In partiular, we take the successor ordinal at the beginning and subtract 1 at the end since the intermediate systems contain only (strictly) positive numbers. Note the similarity with df-bj-fractemp 37511 but we did not use the present definition there since we wanted to have defined +∞ first. See bj-iomnnom 37573 for its value at +∞. TODO: Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘∅) = 0. Define ⊢ ℕ0 = (iω↪ℕ “ ω) and ⊢ ℕ = (ℕ0 ∖ {0}). Prove ⊢ iω↪ℕ:(ω ∪ {ω})–1-1-onto→(ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) and ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω):ω–1-1-onto→ℕ0. Prove that these bijections are respectively an isomorphism of ordered "extended rigs" and of ordered rigs. Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω) = rec((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0). (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ iω↪ℕ = ((𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ ⟨[⟨{𝑟 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑟 <Q ⟨suc 𝑛, 1o⟩}, 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) ∪ {⟨ω, +∞⟩})
Theorem	bj-imafv 37565	If the direct image of a singleton under any of two functions is the same, then the values of these functions at the corresponding point agree. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐹 “ {𝐴}) = (𝐺 “ {𝐴}) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴))
Theorem	bj-funun 37566	Value of a function expressed as a union of two functions at a point not in the domain of one of them. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴))
Theorem	bj-fununsn1 37567	Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point not equal to the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴))
Theorem	bj-fununsn2 37568	Value of a function expressed as a union of a function and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐺 ∪ {⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) = 𝐶)
Theorem	bj-fvsnun1 37569	The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at arguments other than the replaced one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form and remove two sethood hypotheses. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐷) = (𝐹‘𝐷))
Theorem	bj-fvsnun2 37570	The value of a function with one of its ordered pairs replaced, at the replaced ordered pair. See also fvsnun2 7138. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2007.) Put in deduction form. (Revised by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∖ {𝐴})) ∪ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐴) = 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-fvmptunsn1 37571*	Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at the first component of that couple. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷)
Theorem	bj-fvmptunsn2 37572*	Value of a function expressed as a union of a mapsto expression and a singleton on a couple (with disjoint domain) at a point in the domain of the mapsto construction. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∪ {⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐸) → 𝐵 = 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐸) = 𝐺)
Theorem	bj-iomnnom 37573	The canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) maps ω to +∞. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘ω) = +∞
21.19.6.10  Divisibility
Syntax	cnnbar 37574	Syntax for the extended natural numbers.
class ℕ̅
Definition	df-bj-nnbar 37575	Definition of the extended natural numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ℕ̅ = (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞})
Syntax	czzbar 37576	Syntax for the extended integers.
class ℤ̅
Definition	df-bj-zzbar 37577	Definition of the extended integers. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ℤ̅ = (ℤ ∪ {-∞, +∞})
Syntax	czzhat 37578	Syntax for the one-point-compactified integers.
class ℤ̂
Definition	df-bj-zzhat 37579	Definition of the one-point-compactified. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ℤ̂ = (ℤ ∪ {∞})
Syntax	cdivc 37580	Syntax for the divisibility relation.
class ∥ℂ
Definition	df-bj-divc 37581*	Definition of the divisibility relation (compare df-dvds 16222). Since 0 is absorbing, ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) → (𝐴 ∥ℂ 0)) and ⊢ ((0 ∥ℂ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 = 0). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ∥ℂ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ̅ ∪ ℤ̂)(𝑛 ·ℂ̅ 𝑥) = 𝑦)}
21.19.7  Monoids See ccmn 19755 and subsequents. The first few statements of this subsection can be put very early after ccmn 19755. Proposal: in the main part, make separate subsections of commutative monoids and abelian groups. Relabel cabl 19756 to "cabl" or, preferably, other labels containing "abl" to "abel", for consistency.
Theorem	bj-smgrpssmgm 37582	Semigroups are magmas. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Smgrp ⊆ Mgm
Theorem	bj-smgrpssmgmel 37583	Semigroups are magmas (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 12-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Smgrp → 𝐺 ∈ Mgm)
Theorem	bj-mndsssmgrp 37584	Monoids are semigroups. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Mnd ⊆ Smgrp
Theorem	bj-mndsssmgrpel 37585	Monoids are semigroups (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Mnd → 𝐺 ∈ Smgrp)
Theorem	bj-cmnssmnd 37586	Commutative monoids are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ CMnd ⊆ Mnd
Theorem	bj-cmnssmndel 37587	Commutative monoids are monoids (elemental version). This is a more direct proof of cmnmnd 19772, which relies on iscmn 19764. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ CMnd → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd)
Theorem	bj-grpssmnd 37588	Groups are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Grp ⊆ Mnd
Theorem	bj-grpssmndel 37589	Groups are monoids (elemental version). Shorter proof of grpmnd 18916. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Grp → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd)
Theorem	bj-ablssgrp 37590	Abelian groups are groups. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Abel ⊆ Grp
Theorem	bj-ablssgrpel 37591	Abelian groups are groups (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablgrp 19760. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ Grp)
Theorem	bj-ablsscmn 37592	Abelian groups are commutative monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Abel ⊆ CMnd
Theorem	bj-ablsscmnel 37593	Abelian groups are commutative monoids (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablcmn 19762. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd)
Theorem	bj-modssabl 37594	(The additive groups of) modules are abelian groups. (The elemental version is lmodabl 20904; see also lmodgrp 20862 and lmodcmn 20905.) (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ LMod ⊆ Abel
Theorem	bj-vecssmod 37595	Vector spaces are modules. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ LVec ⊆ LMod
Theorem	bj-vecssmodel 37596	Vector spaces are modules (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of lveclmod 21101. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ LVec → 𝐴 ∈ LMod)
21.19.7.1  Finite sums in monoids UPDATE: a similar summation is already defined as df-gsum 17405 (although it mixes finite and infinite sums, which makes it harder to understand).
Syntax	cfinsum 37597	Syntax for the class "finite summation in monoids".
class FinSum
Definition	df-bj-finsum 37598*	Finite summation in commutative monoids. This finite summation function can be extended to pairs ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ where 𝑦 is a left-unital magma and 𝑧 is defined on a totally ordered set (choosing left-associative composition), or dropping unitality and requiring nonempty families, or on any monoids for families of permutable elements, etc. We use the term "summation", even though the definition stands for any unital, commutative and associative composition law. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ FinSum = (𝑥 ∈ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ CMnd ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ Fin 𝑧:𝑡⟶(Base‘𝑦))} ↦ (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→dom (2nd ‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑥)‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘𝑚))))
Theorem	bj-finsumval0 37599*	Value of a finite sum. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐼⟶(Base‘𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 FinSum 𝐵) = (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐼 ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘𝐴), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝐵‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘(♯‘𝐼)))))
21.19.8  Affine, Euclidean, and Cartesian geometry A few basic theorems to start affine, Euclidean, and Cartesian geometry. The first step is to define real vector spaces, then barycentric coordinates and convex hulls.
21.19.8.1  Real vector spaces In this section, we introduce real vector spaces.
Theorem	bj-fvimacnv0 37600	Variant of fvimacnv 7006 where membership of 𝐴 in the domain is not needed provided the containing class 𝐵 does not contain the empty set. Note that this antecedent would not be needed with Definition df-afv 47562. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵)))