Theorem inex2g 5295

Description: Sufficient condition for an intersection to be a set. Commuted form of inex1g 5294. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Dec-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inex2g	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem inex2g

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		incom 4189	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)
2		inex1g 5294	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
3	1, 2	eqeltrid 2839	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∈ wcel 2109  Vcvv 3464   ∩ cin 3930

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5271

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-rab 3421  df-v 3466  df-in 3938

This theorem is referenced by:  satefvfmla1  35452  inex3  38361  inxpex  38362  dfcnvrefrels2  38551  dfcnvrefrels3  38552  iunrelexp0  43693