Theorem oi0 9478

Description: Definition of the ordinal isomorphism when its arguments are not meaningful. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
oicl.1	⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oi0	⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 = ∅)

Proof of Theorem oi0

Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑡 𝑣 𝑥 ℎ 𝑗 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		oicl.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)
2		df-oi 9460	. . 3 ⊢ OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) = if((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴), (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}), ∅)
3	1, 2	eqtri 2788	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = if((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴), (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}), ∅)
4		iffalse 4492	. 2 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → if((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴), (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}), ∅) = ∅)
5	3, 4	eqtrid 2812	1 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 = ∅)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1563  ∀wral 3079  ∃wrex 3089  {crab 3417  Vcvv 3457  ∅c0 4288  ifcif 4483   class class class wbr 5105   ↦ cmpt 5186   Se wse 5603   We wwe 5604  ran crn 5653   ↾ cres 5654   “ cima 5655  Oncon0 6350  ℩crio 7356  recscrecs 8345  OrdIsocoi 9459

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1818  ax-4 1832  ax-5 1933  ax-6 1990  ax-7 2031  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2737

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-ex 1803  df-sb 2094  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-if 4484  df-oi 9460

This theorem is referenced by:  oicl  9479  oif  9480  oiexg  9485