Theorem oi0 9462

Description: Definition of the ordinal isomorphism when its arguments are not meaningful. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
oicl.1	⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oi0	⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 = ∅)

Proof of Theorem oi0

Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑡 𝑣 𝑥 ℎ 𝑗 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		oicl.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)
2		df-oi 9444	. . 3 ⊢ OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) = if((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴), (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}), ∅)
3	1, 2	eqtri 2775	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = if((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴), (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}), ∅)
4		iffalse 4479	. 2 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → if((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴), (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}), ∅) = ∅)
5	3, 4	eqtrid 2799	1 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 = ∅)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1550  ∀wral 3066  ∃wrex 3076  {crab 3404  Vcvv 3444  ∅c0 4276  ifcif 4470   class class class wbr 5090   ↦ cmpt 5171   Se wse 5587   We wwe 5588  ran crn 5637   ↾ cres 5638   “ cima 5639  Oncon0 6331  ℩crio 7337  recscrecs 8325  OrdIsocoi 9443

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1805  ax-4 1819  ax-5 1920  ax-6 1977  ax-7 2018  ax-8 2134  ax-9 2142  ax-ext 2724

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 857  df-ex 1790  df-sb 2081  df-clab 2731  df-cleq 2744  df-clel 2827  df-if 4471  df-oi 9444

This theorem is referenced by:  oicl  9463  oif  9464  oiexg  9469