Theorem oicl 9482

Description: The order type of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
oicl.1	⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oicl	⊢ Ord dom 𝐹

Proof of Theorem oicl

Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑡 𝑣 𝑥 ℎ 𝑗 𝑤 𝑧 𝑓 𝑖 𝑟 𝑠 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2729	. . . . 5 ⊢ recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) = recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)))
2		eqid 2729	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}
3		eqid 2729	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))
4	1, 2, 3	ordtypecbv 9470	. . . 4 ⊢ recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) = recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)))
5		eqid 2729	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}
6		oicl.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)
7		simpl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝑅 We 𝐴)
8		simpr 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)
9	4, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8	ordtypelem5 9475	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → (Ord dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐴))
10	9	simpld 494	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → Ord dom 𝐹)
11		ord0 6386	. . 3 ⊢ Ord ∅
12	6	oi0 9481	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 = ∅)
13	12	dmeqd 5869	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = dom ∅)
14		dm0 5884	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅
15	13, 14	eqtrdi 2780	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = ∅)
16		ordeq 6339	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 = ∅ → (Ord dom 𝐹 ↔ Ord ∅))
17	15, 16	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → (Ord dom 𝐹 ↔ Ord ∅))
18	11, 17	mpbiri 258	. 2 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → Ord dom 𝐹)
19	10, 18	pm2.61i 182	1 ⊢ Ord dom 𝐹

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540  ∀wral 3044  ∃wrex 3053  {crab 3405  Vcvv 3447  ∅c0 4296   class class class wbr 5107   ↦ cmpt 5188   Se wse 5589   We wwe 5590  dom cdm 5638  ran crn 5639   “ cima 5641  Ord word 6331  Oncon0 6332  ⟶wf 6507  ℩crio 7343  recscrecs 8339  OrdIsocoi 9462

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rmo 3354  df-reu 3355  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-pss 3934  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-tr 5215  df-id 5533  df-eprel 5538  df-po 5546  df-so 5547  df-fr 5591  df-se 5592  df-we 5593  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-pred 6274  df-ord 6335  df-on 6336  df-lim 6337  df-suc 6338  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-f1 6516  df-fo 6517  df-f1o 6518  df-fv 6519  df-riota 7344  df-ov 7390  df-2nd 7969  df-frecs 8260  df-wrecs 8291  df-recs 8340  df-oi 9463

This theorem is referenced by:  oion  9489  oieu  9492  oismo  9493  oiid  9494  wofib  9498  cantnflt  9625  cantnfp1lem3  9633  cantnflem1b  9639  cantnflem1  9642  wemapwe  9650  cnfcomlem  9652  cnfcom  9653  cnfcom2lem  9654  infxpenlem  9966  hsmexlem1  10379  fpwwe2lem7  10590  fpwwe2lem8  10591  fpwwe2lem9  10592