Theorem oicl 9567

Description: The order type of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
oicl.1	⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oicl	⊢ Ord dom 𝐹

Proof of Theorem oicl

Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑡 𝑣 𝑥 ℎ 𝑗 𝑤 𝑧 𝑓 𝑖 𝑟 𝑠 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2735	. . . . 5 ⊢ recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) = recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)))
2		eqid 2735	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}
3		eqid 2735	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))
4	1, 2, 3	ordtypecbv 9555	. . . 4 ⊢ recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) = recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)))
5		eqid 2735	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}
6		oicl.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)
7		simpl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝑅 We 𝐴)
8		simpr 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)
9	4, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8	ordtypelem5 9560	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → (Ord dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐴))
10	9	simpld 494	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → Ord dom 𝐹)
11		ord0 6439	. . 3 ⊢ Ord ∅
12	6	oi0 9566	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 = ∅)
13	12	dmeqd 5919	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = dom ∅)
14		dm0 5934	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅
15	13, 14	eqtrdi 2791	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = ∅)
16		ordeq 6393	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 = ∅ → (Ord dom 𝐹 ↔ Ord ∅))
17	15, 16	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → (Ord dom 𝐹 ↔ Ord ∅))
18	11, 17	mpbiri 258	. 2 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → Ord dom 𝐹)
19	10, 18	pm2.61i 182	1 ⊢ Ord dom 𝐹

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537  ∀wral 3059  ∃wrex 3068  {crab 3433  Vcvv 3478  ∅c0 4339   class class class wbr 5148   ↦ cmpt 5231   Se wse 5639   We wwe 5640  dom cdm 5689  ran crn 5690   “ cima 5692  Ord word 6385  Oncon0 6386  ⟶wf 6559  ℩crio 7387  recscrecs 8409  OrdIsocoi 9547

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pr 5438  ax-un 7754

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rmo 3378  df-reu 3379  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-sbc 3792  df-csb 3909  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-pss 3983  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-pw 4607  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-iun 4998  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-tr 5266  df-id 5583  df-eprel 5589  df-po 5597  df-so 5598  df-fr 5641  df-se 5642  df-we 5643  df-xp 5695  df-rel 5696  df-cnv 5697  df-co 5698  df-dm 5699  df-rn 5700  df-res 5701  df-ima 5702  df-pred 6323  df-ord 6389  df-on 6390  df-lim 6391  df-suc 6392  df-iota 6516  df-fun 6565  df-fn 6566  df-f 6567  df-f1 6568  df-fo 6569  df-f1o 6570  df-fv 6571  df-riota 7388  df-ov 7434  df-2nd 8014  df-frecs 8305  df-wrecs 8336  df-recs 8410  df-oi 9548

This theorem is referenced by:  oion  9574  oieu  9577  oismo  9578  oiid  9579  wofib  9583  cantnflt  9710  cantnfp1lem3  9718  cantnflem1b  9724  cantnflem1  9727  wemapwe  9735  cnfcomlem  9737  cnfcom  9738  cnfcom2lem  9739  infxpenlem  10051  hsmexlem1  10464  fpwwe2lem7  10675  fpwwe2lem8  10676  fpwwe2lem9  10677