Theorem oicl 9490

Description: The order type of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
oicl.1	⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oicl	⊢ Ord dom 𝐹

Proof of Theorem oicl

Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑡 𝑣 𝑥 ℎ 𝑗 𝑤 𝑧 𝑓 𝑖 𝑟 𝑠 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2769	. . . . 5 ⊢ recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) = recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)))
2		eqid 2769	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}
3		eqid 2769	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))
4	1, 2, 3	ordtypecbv 9478	. . . 4 ⊢ recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) = recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)))
5		eqid 2769	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}
6		oicl.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)
7		simpl 487	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝑅 We 𝐴)
8		simpr 489	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)
9	4, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8	ordtypelem5 9483	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → (Ord dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐴))
10	9	simpld 499	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → Ord dom 𝐹)
11		ord0 6416	. . 3 ⊢ Ord ∅
12	6	oi0 9489	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 = ∅)
13	12	dmeqd 5896	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = dom ∅)
14		dm0 5911	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅
15	13, 14	eqtrdi 2820	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = ∅)
16		ordeq 6368	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 = ∅ → (Ord dom 𝐹 ↔ Ord ∅))
17	15, 16	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → (Ord dom 𝐹 ↔ Ord ∅))
18	11, 17	mpbiri 261	. 2 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → Ord dom 𝐹)
19	10, 18	pm2.61i 184	1 ⊢ Ord dom 𝐹

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1567  ∀wral 3085  ∃wrex 3095  {crab 3423  Vcvv 3463  ∅c0 4294   class class class wbr 5113   ↦ cmpt 5196   Se wse 5613   We wwe 5614  dom cdm 5662  ran crn 5663   “ cima 5665  Ord word 6360  Oncon0 6361  ⟶wf 6533  ℩crio 7367  recscrecs 8356  OrdIsocoi 9470

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-sep 5261  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5405  ax-un 7733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rmo 3376  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-pss 3933  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4877  df-iun 4962  df-br 5114  df-opab 5178  df-mpt 5197  df-tr 5223  df-id 5557  df-eprel 5562  df-po 5570  df-so 5571  df-fr 5615  df-se 5616  df-we 5617  df-xp 5668  df-rel 5669  df-cnv 5670  df-co 5671  df-dm 5672  df-rn 5673  df-res 5674  df-ima 5675  df-pred 6303  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7368  df-ov 7414  df-2nd 7986  df-frecs 8277  df-wrecs 8308  df-recs 8357  df-oi 9471

This theorem is referenced by:  oion  9497  oieu  9500  oismo  9501  oiid  9502  wofib  9506  cantnflt  9640  cantnfp1lem3  9648  cantnflem1b  9654  cantnflem1  9657  wemapwe  9665  cnfcomlem  9667  cnfcom  9668  cnfcom2lem  9669  infxpenlem  9996  hsmexlem1  10409  fpwwe2lem7  10621  fpwwe2lem8  10622  fpwwe2lem9  10623  ordtypeon  35423