Theorem oicl 9487

Description: The order type of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
oicl.1	⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oicl	⊢ Ord dom 𝐹

Proof of Theorem oicl

Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑡 𝑣 𝑥 ℎ 𝑗 𝑤 𝑧 𝑓 𝑖 𝑟 𝑠 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2763	. . . . 5 ⊢ recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) = recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)))
2		eqid 2763	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}
3		eqid 2763	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))
4	1, 2, 3	ordtypecbv 9475	. . . 4 ⊢ recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) = recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)))
5		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}
6		oicl.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)
7		simpl 487	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝑅 We 𝐴)
8		simpr 489	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)
9	4, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8	ordtypelem5 9480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → (Ord dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐴))
10	9	simpld 499	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → Ord dom 𝐹)
11		ord0 6415	. . 3 ⊢ Ord ∅
12	6	oi0 9486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 = ∅)
13	12	dmeqd 5895	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = dom ∅)
14		dm0 5910	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅
15	13, 14	eqtrdi 2814	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = ∅)
16		ordeq 6367	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 = ∅ → (Ord dom 𝐹 ↔ Ord ∅))
17	15, 16	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → (Ord dom 𝐹 ↔ Ord ∅))
18	11, 17	mpbiri 261	. 2 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → Ord dom 𝐹)
19	10, 18	pm2.61i 184	1 ⊢ Ord dom 𝐹

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570  ∀wral 3079  ∃wrex 3089  {crab 3416  Vcvv 3455  ∅c0 4286   class class class wbr 5109   ↦ cmpt 5192   Se wse 5612   We wwe 5613  dom cdm 5661  ran crn 5662   “ cima 5664  Ord word 6359  Oncon0 6360  ⟶wf 6532  ℩crio 7366  recscrecs 8353  OrdIsocoi 9467

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-pss 3925  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-tr 5219  df-id 5556  df-eprel 5561  df-po 5569  df-so 5570  df-fr 5614  df-se 5615  df-we 5616  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-pred 6302  df-ord 6363  df-on 6364  df-lim 6365  df-suc 6366  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-riota 7367  df-ov 7413  df-2nd 7983  df-frecs 8274  df-wrecs 8305  df-recs 8354  df-oi 9468

This theorem is referenced by:  oion  9494  oieu  9497  oismo  9498  oiid  9499  wofib  9503  cantnflt  9637  cantnfp1lem3  9645  cantnflem1b  9651  cantnflem1  9654  wemapwe  9662  cnfcomlem  9664  cnfcom  9665  cnfcom2lem  9666  infxpenlem  9993  hsmexlem1  10405  fpwwe2lem7  10617  fpwwe2lem8  10618  fpwwe2lem9  10619  ordtypeon  35481