Theorem oicl 9598

Description: The order type of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
oicl.1	⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oicl	⊢ Ord dom 𝐹

Proof of Theorem oicl

Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑡 𝑣 𝑥 ℎ 𝑗 𝑤 𝑧 𝑓 𝑖 𝑟 𝑠 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))) = recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)))
2		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}
3		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)) = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))
4	1, 2, 3	ordtypecbv 9586	. . . 4 ⊢ recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) = recs((ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}∀𝑢 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤} ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣)))
5		eqid 2740	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡} = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (recs((𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑠 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦}∀𝑟 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ ran 𝑓 𝑖𝑅𝑦} ¬ 𝑟𝑅𝑠))) “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}
6		oicl.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)
7		simpl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝑅 We 𝐴)
8		simpr 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)
9	4, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8	ordtypelem5 9591	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → (Ord dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐴))
10	9	simpld 494	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → Ord dom 𝐹)
11		ord0 6448	. . 3 ⊢ Ord ∅
12	6	oi0 9597	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 = ∅)
13	12	dmeqd 5930	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = dom ∅)
14		dm0 5945	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅
15	13, 14	eqtrdi 2796	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = ∅)
16		ordeq 6402	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 = ∅ → (Ord dom 𝐹 ↔ Ord ∅))
17	15, 16	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → (Ord dom 𝐹 ↔ Ord ∅))
18	11, 17	mpbiri 258	. 2 ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → Ord dom 𝐹)
19	10, 18	pm2.61i 182	1 ⊢ Ord dom 𝐹

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537  ∀wral 3067  ∃wrex 3076  {crab 3443  Vcvv 3488  ∅c0 4352   class class class wbr 5166   ↦ cmpt 5249   Se wse 5650   We wwe 5651  dom cdm 5700  ran crn 5701   “ cima 5703  Ord word 6394  Oncon0 6395  ⟶wf 6569  ℩crio 7403  recscrecs 8426  OrdIsocoi 9578

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rmo 3388  df-reu 3389  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-csb 3922  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-pss 3996  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-iun 5017  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-tr 5284  df-id 5593  df-eprel 5599  df-po 5607  df-so 5608  df-fr 5652  df-se 5653  df-we 5654  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-pred 6332  df-ord 6398  df-on 6399  df-lim 6400  df-suc 6401  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-f1 6578  df-fo 6579  df-f1o 6580  df-fv 6581  df-riota 7404  df-ov 7451  df-2nd 8031  df-frecs 8322  df-wrecs 8353  df-recs 8427  df-oi 9579

This theorem is referenced by:  oion  9605  oieu  9608  oismo  9609  oiid  9610  wofib  9614  cantnflt  9741  cantnfp1lem3  9749  cantnflem1b  9755  cantnflem1  9758  wemapwe  9766  cnfcomlem  9768  cnfcom  9769  cnfcom2lem  9770  infxpenlem  10082  hsmexlem1  10495  fpwwe2lem7  10706  fpwwe2lem8  10707  fpwwe2lem9  10708