Theorem opabssi 33258

Description: Sufficient condition for a collection of ordered pairs to be a subclass of a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Feb-2022.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
opabssi.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opabssi	⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem opabssi

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-opab 5167	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
2		eleq1 2848	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴))
3	2	biimprd 251	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
4		opabssi.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴)
5	3, 4	impel 515	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
6	5	exlimivv 1964	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
7	6	abssi 3992	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐴
8	1, 7	eqsstri 3955	1 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569  ∃wex 1811   ∈ wcel 2144  {cab 2738   ⊆ wss 3896  ⟨cop 4834  {copab 5166

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ss 3897  df-opab 5167

This theorem is used by:  opabid2ss  33259