Theorem r19.36zv 4393

Description: Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r19.36zv	⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem r19.36zv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r19.35 3246	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
2		r19.9rzv 4386	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
3	2	imbi2d 344	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)))
4	1, 3	bitr4id 293	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ≠ wne 2934  ∀wral 3053  ∃wrex 3054  ∅c0 4211

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2020  ax-9 2124  ax-12 2179  ax-ext 2710

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2075  df-clab 2717  df-cleq 2730  df-ne 2935  df-ral 3058  df-rex 3059  df-dif 3846  df-nul 4212

This theorem is referenced by:  2reuimp  44140