Theorem r19.36zv 4467

Description: Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. It is valid only when the domain of quantification is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r19.36zv	⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem r19.36zv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r19.35 3120	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
2		r19.9rzv 4460	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
3	2	imbi2d 343	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)))
4	1, 3	bitr4id 293	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ≠ wne 2955  ∀wral 3076  ∃wrex 3086  ∅c0 4278

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-dif 3901  df-nul 4279

This theorem is used by:  2reuimp  48107