Theorem redundeq1 39080

Description: Equivalence of redundancy predicates. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
redundeq1.1	⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐷

Assertion

Ref	Expression
redundeq1	⊢ (𝐴 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐷 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)

Proof of Theorem redundeq1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		redundeq1.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐷
2	1	sseq1i 3943	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵)
3	1	ineq1i 4145	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐷 ∩ 𝐶)
4	3	eqeq1i 2744	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
5	2, 4	anbi12i 634	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
6		df-redund 39075	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
7		df-redund 39075	. 2 ⊢ (𝐷 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
8	5, 6, 7	3bitr4i 304	1 ⊢ (𝐴 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐷 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 207   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1547   ∩ cin 3882   ⊆ wss 3883   Redund wredund 38571

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-rab 3392  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-redund 39075

This theorem is referenced by:  refrelsredund3  39085