Theorem redundeq1 36669

Description: Equivalence of redundancy predicates. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
redundeq1.1	⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐷

Assertion

Ref	Expression
redundeq1	⊢ (𝐴 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐷 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)

Proof of Theorem redundeq1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		redundeq1.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐷
2	1	sseq1i 3945	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵)
3	1	ineq1i 4139	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐷 ∩ 𝐶)
4	3	eqeq1i 2743	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
5	2, 4	anbi12i 626	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
6		df-redund 36664	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
7		df-redund 36664	. 2 ⊢ (𝐷 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
8	5, 6, 7	3bitr4i 302	1 ⊢ (𝐴 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐷 Redund ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∩ cin 3882   ⊆ wss 3883   Redund wredund 36281

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-redund 36664

This theorem is referenced by:  refrelsredund3  36674