Theorem rexeqbid 3348

Description: Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. See rexeqbidv 3339 for a version based on fewer axioms. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
raleqbid.0	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
raleqbid.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
raleqbid.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
raleqbid.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
raleqbid.4	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexeqbid	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem rexeqbid

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		raleqbid.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
2		raleqbid.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3		raleqbid.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
4	2, 3	rexeqf 3346	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
5	1, 4	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
6		raleqbid.0	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
7		raleqbid.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
8	6, 7	rexbid 3280	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
9	5, 8	bitrd 282	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1569  Ⅎwnf 1815  Ⅎwnfc 2911  ∃wrex 3090

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091

This theorem is used by:  iuneq12df  4981