Theorem rexeqf 3400

Description: Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
raleq1f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
raleq1f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexeqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))

Proof of Theorem rexeqf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		raleq1f.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		raleq1f.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	nfeq 2993	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
4		eleq2 2903	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	anbi1d 631	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	3, 5	exbid 2225	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
7		df-rex 3146	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
8		df-rex 3146	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
9	6, 7, 8	3bitr4g 316	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1780   ∈ wcel 2114  Ⅎwnfc 2963  ∃wrex 3141

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-rex 3146

This theorem is referenced by:  rexeqOLD  3412  rexeqbid  3424  zfrep6  7658  iuneq12daf  30310  indexa  35010