Theorem rexlimddvcbv 41818

Description: Unpack a restricted existential assumption while changing the variable with implicit substitution. Similar to rexlimdvaacbv 41816. The equivalent of this theorem without the bound variable change is rexlimddv 3220. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372, see rexlimddvcbvw 41817 for a weaker version that does not require it. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rexlimddvcbv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜃)
rexlimddvcbv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜓)
rexlimddvcbv.3	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexlimddvcbv	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑦   𝜓,𝑦   𝜒,𝑥   𝜃,𝑦   𝑥,𝐴   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝜃(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rexlimddvcbv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rexlimddvcbv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜃)
2		rexlimddvcbv.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))
3		rexlimddvcbv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜓)
4	2, 3	rexlimdvaacbv 41816	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜃 → 𝜓))
5	1, 4	mpd 15	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   ∈ wcel 2106  ∃wrex 3065

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-13 2372

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070

This theorem is referenced by: (None)