| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rspceb2dv | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution in both directions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 28-Sep-2024.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rspceb2dv.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
| rspceb2dv.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) |
| rspceb2dv.3 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| rspceb2dv.4 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rspceb2dv | ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rspceb2dv.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | 1 | rexlimdva 3154 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
| 3 | rspceb2dv.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 4 | rspceb2dv.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | |
| 5 | rspceb2dv.4 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
| 6 | 5 | rspcev 3621 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
| 7 | 3, 4, 6 | syl2anc 584 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
| 8 | 7 | ex 412 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) |
| 9 | 2, 8 | impbid 212 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2107 ∃wrex 3069 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1794 ax-4 1808 ax-5 1909 ax-6 1966 ax-7 2006 ax-8 2109 ax-9 2117 ax-ext 2707 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-tru 1542 df-ex 1779 df-sb 2064 df-clab 2714 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2815 df-ral 3061 df-rex 3070 |
| This theorem is referenced by: negfi 12218 psdmul 22171 uspgrlimlem1 47960 ipolubdm 48891 ipoglbdm 48894 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |