![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rspceb2dv | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution in both directions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 28-Sep-2024.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspceb2dv.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
rspceb2dv.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) |
rspceb2dv.3 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
rspceb2dv.4 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspceb2dv | ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rspceb2dv.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | |
2 | 1 | rexlimdva 3145 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
3 | rspceb2dv.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) | |
4 | rspceb2dv.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | |
5 | rspceb2dv.4 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
6 | 5 | rspcev 3601 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜃) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
7 | 3, 4, 6 | syl2anc 582 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
8 | 7 | ex 411 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) |
9 | 2, 8 | impbid 211 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 394 = wceq 1533 ∈ wcel 2098 ∃wrex 3060 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1789 ax-4 1803 ax-5 1905 ax-6 1963 ax-7 2003 ax-8 2100 ax-9 2108 ax-ext 2696 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 395 df-tru 1536 df-ex 1774 df-sb 2060 df-clab 2703 df-cleq 2717 df-clel 2802 df-ral 3052 df-rex 3061 |
This theorem is referenced by: psdmul 22098 ipolubdm 48110 ipoglbdm 48113 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |