Theorem rspcime 3556

Description: Prove a restricted existential. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcime.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜓)
rspcime.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcime	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑥   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcime

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcime.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcime.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜓)
3		simpl 482	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜑)
4	2, 3	2thd 264	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
5		id 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜑)
6	1, 4, 5	rspcedvd 3555	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3064

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069

This theorem is referenced by:  elrnmptdv  5860  aks4d1p8d2  40021  mnuprdlem3  41781  mnurndlem1  41788  grumnudlem  41792  grumnud  41793  inaex  41804  gruex  41805