Theorem rspcime 3567

Description: Prove a restricted existential. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcime.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜓)
rspcime.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcime	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑥   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcime

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcime.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcime.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜓)
3		simpl 484	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜑)
4	2, 3	2thd 267	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
5		id 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜑)
6	1, 4, 5	rspcedvd 3564	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1548   ∈ wcel 2121  ∃wrex 3065

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2123  ax-9 2131  ax-ext 2713

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-tru 1551  df-ex 1788  df-sb 2075  df-clab 2720  df-cleq 2733  df-clel 2816  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3066

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcedeq1vd  3569  rspcedeq2vd  3570  elrnmptdv  5914  aks4d1p8d2  42585  mnuprdlem3  44733  mnurndlem1  44740  grumnudlem  44744  grumnud  44745  inaex  44756  gruex  44757