Theorem rspcime 3564

Description: Prove a restricted existential. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcime.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜓)
rspcime.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcime	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑥   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcime

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcime.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcime.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜓)
3		simpl 483	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜑)
4	2, 3	2thd 264	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
5		id 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜑)
6	1, 4, 5	rspcedvd 3563	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  ∃wrex 3065

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1783  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070

This theorem is referenced by:  elrnmptdv  5871  aks4d1p8d2  40093  mnuprdlem3  41892  mnurndlem1  41899  grumnudlem  41903  grumnud  41904  inaex  41915  gruex  41916