Theorem rspcedvdw 3616

Description: Version of rspcedvd 3615 where the implicit substitution hypothesis does not have an antecedent, which also avoids a disjoint variable condition on 𝜑, 𝑥. (Contributed by SN, 20-Aug-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcedvdw.s	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
rspcedvdw.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcedvdw.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedvdw	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedvdw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcedvdw.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcedvdw.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
3		rspcedvdw.s	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	rspcev 3613	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
5	1, 2, 4	syl2anc 585	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2107  ∃wrex 3071

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2704

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1783  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072

This theorem is referenced by:  flt4lem2  41389  flt4lem7  41401  pzriprnglem7  46811  pzriprnglem13  46817  pzriprnglem14  46818  pzriprngALT  46819