Theorem rspcedvdw 40176

Description: Version of rspcedvd 3564 where the implicit substitution hypothesis does not have an antecedent, which also avoids a disjoint variable condition on 𝜑, 𝑥. (Contributed by SN, 20-Aug-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcedvdw.s	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
rspcedvdw.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcedvdw.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedvdw	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedvdw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcedvdw.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcedvdw.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
3		rspcedvdw.s	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	rspcev 3561	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
5	1, 2, 4	syl2anc 584	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2110  ∃wrex 3067

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2072  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2818  df-ral 3071  df-rex 3072

This theorem is referenced by:  flt4lem2  40481  flt4lem7  40493