Theorem tskr1om 10189

Description: A nonempty Tarski class is infinite, because it contains all the finite levels of the cumulative hierarchy. (This proof does not use ax-inf 9101.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tskr1om	⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1 “ ω) ⊆ 𝑇)

Proof of Theorem tskr1om

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6670	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑅1‘𝑥) = (𝑅1‘∅))
2	1	eleq1d 2897	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑅1‘∅) ∈ 𝑇))
3		fveq2 6670	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑅1‘𝑥) = (𝑅1‘𝑦))
4	3	eleq1d 2897	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
5		fveq2 6670	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝑅1‘𝑥) = (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦))
6	5	eleq1d 2897	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
7		r10 9197	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑅1‘∅) = ∅
8		tsk0 10185	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → ∅ ∈ 𝑇)
9	7, 8	eqeltrid 2917	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1‘∅) ∈ 𝑇)
10		tskpw 10175	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇) → 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇)
11		nnon 7586	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → 𝑦 ∈ On)
12		r1suc 9199	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦))
13	11, 12	syl 17	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦))
14	13	eleq1d 2897	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ((𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
15	10, 14	syl5ibr 248	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇) → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
16	15	expd 418	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝑇 ∈ Tarski → ((𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇 → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇)))
17	16	adantrd 494	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → ((𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇 → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇)))
18	2, 4, 6, 9, 17	finds2 7610	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇))
19		eleq1 2900	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
20	19	imbi2d 343	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → (((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇) ↔ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
21	18, 20	syl5ibcom 247	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
22	21	rexlimiv 3280	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
23		r1fnon 9196	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑅1 Fn On
24		fnfun 6453	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅1 Fn On → Fun 𝑅1)
25	23, 24	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun 𝑅1
26		fvelima 6731	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun 𝑅1 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1 “ ω)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦)
27	25, 26	mpan 688	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1 “ ω) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦)
28	22, 27	syl11 33	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1 “ ω) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
29	28	ssrdv 3973	1 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1 “ ω) ⊆ 𝑇)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 3016  ∃wrex 3139   ⊆ wss 3936  ∅c0 4291  𝒫 cpw 4539   “ cima 5558  Oncon0 6191  suc csuc 6193  Fun wfun 6349   Fn wfn 6350  ‘cfv 6355  ωcom 7580  𝑅₁cr1 9191  Tarskictsk 10170

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-rep 5190  ax-sep 5203  ax-nul 5210  ax-pow 5266  ax-pr 5330  ax-un 7461

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-reu 3145  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3773  df-csb 3884  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-pss 3954  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-pw 4541  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-tp 4572  df-op 4574  df-uni 4839  df-iun 4921  df-br 5067  df-opab 5129  df-mpt 5147  df-tr 5173  df-id 5460  df-eprel 5465  df-po 5474  df-so 5475  df-fr 5514  df-we 5516  df-xp 5561  df-rel 5562  df-cnv 5563  df-co 5564  df-dm 5565  df-rn 5566  df-res 5567  df-ima 5568  df-pred 6148  df-ord 6194  df-on 6195  df-lim 6196  df-suc 6197  df-iota 6314  df-fun 6357  df-fn 6358  df-f 6359  df-f1 6360  df-fo 6361  df-f1o 6362  df-fv 6363  df-om 7581  df-wrecs 7947  df-recs 8008  df-rdg 8046  df-r1 9193  df-tsk 10171

This theorem is referenced by:  tskr1om2  10190  tskinf  10191