MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  upgr2wlk Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem upgr2wlk 26433
Description: Properties of a pair of functions to be a walk of length 2 in a pseudograph. Note that the vertices need not to be distinct and the edges can be loops or multiedges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 16-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 28-Oct-2021.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
upgr2wlk.v 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
upgr2wlk.i 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
Assertion
Ref Expression
upgr2wlk (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))

Proof of Theorem upgr2wlk
Dummy variable 𝑘 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 upgr2wlk.v . . . 4 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
2 upgr2wlk.i . . . 4 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
31, 2upgriswlk 26406 . . 3 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
43anbi1d 740 . 2 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2)))
5 iswrdb 13250 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝐹:(0..^(#‘𝐹))⟶dom 𝐼)
6 oveq2 6612 . . . . . . . . . 10 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (0..^(#‘𝐹)) = (0..^2))
76feq2d 5988 . . . . . . . . 9 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (𝐹:(0..^(#‘𝐹))⟶dom 𝐼𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼))
85, 7syl5bb 272 . . . . . . . 8 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼))
9 oveq2 6612 . . . . . . . . 9 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (0...(#‘𝐹)) = (0...2))
109feq2d 5988 . . . . . . . 8 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉))
11 fzo0to2pr 12494 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (0..^2) = {0, 1}
126, 11syl6eq 2671 . . . . . . . . . 10 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (0..^(#‘𝐹)) = {0, 1})
1312raleqdv 3133 . . . . . . . . 9 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ {0, 1} (𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}))
14 2wlklem 26432 . . . . . . . . 9 (∀𝑘 ∈ {0, 1} (𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ↔ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))
1513, 14syl6bb 276 . . . . . . . 8 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ↔ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)})))
168, 10, 153anbi123d 1396 . . . . . . 7 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
1716adantl 482 . . . . . 6 ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
18 3anass 1040 . . . . . 6 ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)})) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
1917, 18syl6bb 276 . . . . 5 ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)})))))
2019ex 450 . . . 4 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))))
2120pm5.32rd 671 . . 3 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))) ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2)))
22 3anass 1040 . . . 4 (((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)})) ↔ ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
23 an32 838 . . . 4 (((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))) ↔ ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))) ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2))
2422, 23bitri 264 . . 3 (((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)})) ↔ ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))) ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2))
2521, 24syl6bbr 278 . 2 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
26 2nn0 11253 . . . . . . 7 2 ∈ ℕ0
27 fnfzo0hash 13172 . . . . . . 7 ((2 ∈ ℕ0𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼) → (#‘𝐹) = 2)
2826, 27mpan 705 . . . . . 6 (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 → (#‘𝐹) = 2)
2928pm4.71i 663 . . . . 5 (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2))
3029bicomi 214 . . . 4 ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ 𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼)
3130a1i 11 . . 3 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ 𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼))
32313anbi1d 1400 . 2 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)})) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
334, 25, 323bitrd 294 1 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 196  wa 384  w3a 1036   = wceq 1480  wcel 1987  wral 2907  {cpr 4150   class class class wbr 4613  dom cdm 5074  wf 5843  cfv 5847  (class class class)co 6604  0cc0 9880  1c1 9881   + caddc 9883  2c2 11014  0cn0 11236  ...cfz 12268  ..^cfzo 12406  #chash 13057  Word cword 13230  Vtxcvtx 25774  iEdgciedg 25775   UPGraph cupgr 25871  Walkscwlks 26362
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1719  ax-4 1734  ax-5 1836  ax-6 1885  ax-7 1932  ax-8 1989  ax-9 1996  ax-10 2016  ax-11 2031  ax-12 2044  ax-13 2245  ax-ext 2601  ax-rep 4731  ax-sep 4741  ax-nul 4749  ax-pow 4803  ax-pr 4867  ax-un 6902  ax-cnex 9936  ax-resscn 9937  ax-1cn 9938  ax-icn 9939  ax-addcl 9940  ax-addrcl 9941  ax-mulcl 9942  ax-mulrcl 9943  ax-mulcom 9944  ax-addass 9945  ax-mulass 9946  ax-distr 9947  ax-i2m1 9948  ax-1ne0 9949  ax-1rid 9950  ax-rnegex 9951  ax-rrecex 9952  ax-cnre 9953  ax-pre-lttri 9954  ax-pre-lttrn 9955  ax-pre-ltadd 9956  ax-pre-mulgt0 9957
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-ifp 1012  df-3or 1037  df-3an 1038  df-tru 1483  df-ex 1702  df-nf 1707  df-sb 1878  df-eu 2473  df-mo 2474  df-clab 2608  df-cleq 2614  df-clel 2617  df-nfc 2750  df-ne 2791  df-nel 2894  df-ral 2912  df-rex 2913  df-reu 2914  df-rmo 2915  df-rab 2916  df-v 3188  df-sbc 3418  df-csb 3515  df-dif 3558  df-un 3560  df-in 3562  df-ss 3569  df-pss 3571  df-nul 3892  df-if 4059  df-pw 4132  df-sn 4149  df-pr 4151  df-tp 4153  df-op 4155  df-uni 4403  df-int 4441  df-iun 4487  df-br 4614  df-opab 4674  df-mpt 4675  df-tr 4713  df-eprel 4985  df-id 4989  df-po 4995  df-so 4996  df-fr 5033  df-we 5035  df-xp 5080  df-rel 5081  df-cnv 5082  df-co 5083  df-dm 5084  df-rn 5085  df-res 5086  df-ima 5087  df-pred 5639  df-ord 5685  df-on 5686  df-lim 5687  df-suc 5688  df-iota 5810  df-fun 5849  df-fn 5850  df-f 5851  df-f1 5852  df-fo 5853  df-f1o 5854  df-fv 5855  df-riota 6565  df-ov 6607  df-oprab 6608  df-mpt2 6609  df-om 7013  df-1st 7113  df-2nd 7114  df-wrecs 7352  df-recs 7413  df-rdg 7451  df-1o 7505  df-2o 7506  df-oadd 7509  df-er 7687  df-map 7804  df-pm 7805  df-en 7900  df-dom 7901  df-sdom 7902  df-fin 7903  df-card 8709  df-cda 8934  df-pnf 10020  df-mnf 10021  df-xr 10022  df-ltxr 10023  df-le 10024  df-sub 10212  df-neg 10213  df-nn 10965  df-2 11023  df-n0 11237  df-xnn0 11308  df-z 11322  df-uz 11632  df-fz 12269  df-fzo 12407  df-hash 13058  df-word 13238  df-edg 25840  df-uhgr 25849  df-upgr 25873  df-wlks 26365
This theorem is referenced by:  umgrwwlks2on  26719
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator