Theorem cbvrexfw 2732

Description: Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrexf 2734 with a disjoint variable condition. Although we don't do so yet, we expect this disjoint variable condition will allow us to remove reliance on ax-i12 1531 and ax-bndl 1533 in the proof. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvrexfw.1	|- F/_ x A
cbvrexfw.2	|- F/_ y A
cbvrexfw.3	|- F/ y ph
cbvrexfw.4	|- F/ x ps
cbvrexfw.5	|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrexfw	|- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )

Distinct variable group:   x, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   ps( x, y)   A( x, y)

Proof of Theorem cbvrexfw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbvrexfw.2	. . . . 5 |- F/_ y A
2	1	nfcri 2344	. . . 4 |- F/ y x e. A
3		cbvrexfw.3	. . . 4 |- F/ y ph
4	2, 3	nfan 1589	. . 3 |- F/ y ( x e. A /\ ph )
5		cbvrexfw.1	. . . . 5 |- F/_ x A
6	5	nfcri 2344	. . . 4 |- F/ x y e. A
7		cbvrexfw.4	. . . 4 |- F/ x ps
8	6, 7	nfan 1589	. . 3 |- F/ x ( y e. A /\ ps )
9		eleq1w 2268	. . . 4 |- ( x = y -> ( x e. A <-> y e. A ) )
10		cbvrexfw.5	. . . 4 |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
11	9, 10	anbi12d 473	. . 3 |- ( x = y -> ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> ( y e. A /\ ps ) ) )
12	4, 8, 11	cbvexv1 1776	. 2 |- ( E. x ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> E. y ( y e. A /\ ps ) )
13		df-rex 2492	. 2 |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x ( x e. A /\ ph ) )
14		df-rex 2492	. 2 |- ( E. y e. A ps <-> E. y ( y e. A /\ ps ) )
15	12, 13, 14	3bitr4i 212	1 |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   F/wnf 1484   E.wex 1516   e. wcel 2178   F/_wnfc 2337   E.wrex 2487

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-ext 2189

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-cleq 2200  df-clel 2203  df-nfc 2339  df-rex 2492

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvrexw  2736  nnwofdc  12474