P. 27 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2601-2700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rexlimdvv 2601*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2004.)
|- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ( ps -> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	rexlimdvva 2602*	Inference from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	r19.26 2603	Theorem 19.26 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( A. x e. A ph /\ A. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.27v 2604*	Restricted quantitifer version of one direction of 19.27 1561. (The other direction holds when A is inhabited, see r19.27mv 3521.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jun-2023.)
|- ( ( A. x e. A ph /\ ps ) -> A. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.28v 2605*	Restricted quantifier version of one direction of 19.28 1563. (The other direction holds when A is inhabited, see r19.28mv 3517.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jun-2023.)
|- ( ( ph /\ A. x e. A ps ) -> A. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.26-2 2606	Theorem 19.26 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph /\ A. x e. A A. y e. B ps ) )
Theorem	r19.26-3 2607	Theorem 19.26 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 3 restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by FL, 22-Nov-2010.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( A. x e. A ph /\ A. x e. A ps /\ A. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	r19.26m 2608	Theorem 19.26 of [Margaris] p. 90 with mixed quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
|- ( A. x ( ( x e. A -> ph ) /\ ( x e. B -> ps ) ) <-> ( A. x e. A ph /\ A. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	ralbi 2609	Distribute a restricted universal quantifier over a biconditional. Theorem 19.15 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( ph <-> ps ) -> ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	rexbi 2610	Distribute a restricted existential quantifier over a biconditional. Theorem 19.18 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantification. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( ph <-> ps ) -> ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	ralbiim 2611	Split a biconditional and distribute quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2012.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( ph <-> ps ) <-> ( A. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) /\ A. x e. A ( ps -> ph ) ) )
Theorem	r19.27av 2612*	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.27 of [Margaris] p. 90. (The other direction doesn't hold when A is empty.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
|- ( ( A. x e. A ph /\ ps ) -> A. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.28av 2613*	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. (The other direction doesn't hold when A is empty.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|- ( ( ph /\ A. x e. A ps ) -> A. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.29 2614	Theorem 19.29 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
|- ( ( A. x e. A ph /\ E. x e. A ps ) -> E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.29r 2615	Variation of Theorem 19.29 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.)
|- ( ( E. x e. A ph /\ A. x e. A ps ) -> E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	ralnex2 2616	Relationship between two restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-May-2023.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B -. ph <-> -. E. x e. A E. y e. B ph )
Theorem	r19.29af2 2617	A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2614. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2017.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) /\ ps ) -> ch )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> ch )
Theorem	r19.29af 2618*	A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2614. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Nov-2017.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) /\ ps ) -> ch )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> ch )
Theorem	r19.29an 2619*	A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2614. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2019.)
|- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) /\ ps ) -> ch )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ E. x e. A ps ) -> ch )
Theorem	r19.29a 2620*	A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2614. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Nov-2017.)
|- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) /\ ps ) -> ch )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> ch )
Theorem	r19.29d2r 2621	Theorem 19.29 of [Margaris] p. 90 with two restricted quantifiers, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. B ps )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A E. y e. B ch )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A E. y e. B ( ps /\ ch ) )
Theorem	r19.29vva 2622*	A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2614, version with two restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Nov-2017.)
|- ( ( ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) -> ch )   &    |- ( ph -> E. x e. A E. y e. B ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> ch )
Theorem	r19.32r 2623	One direction of Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. For decidable propositions this is an equivalence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2018.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- ( ( ph \/ A. x e. A ps ) -> A. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.30dc 2624	Restricted quantifier version of 19.30dc 1627. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jun-2023.)
|- ( ( A. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) /\ DECID E. x e. A ps ) -> ( A. x e. A ph \/ E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.32vr 2625*	One direction of Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. For decidable propositions this is an equivalence, as seen at r19.32vdc 2626. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2018.)
|- ( ( ph \/ A. x e. A ps ) -> A. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.32vdc 2626*	Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers, where ph is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> ( A. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) <-> ( ph \/ A. x e. A ps ) ) )
Theorem	r19.35-1 2627	Restricted quantifier version of 19.35-1 1624. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2018.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( A. x e. A ph -> E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.36av 2628*	One direction of a restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. In classical logic, the converse would hold if A has at least one element, but in intuitionistic logic, that is not a sufficient condition. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( A. x e. A ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	r19.37 2629	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. In classical logic the converse would hold if A has at least one element, but that is not sufficient in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by FL, 13-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( ph -> E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.37av 2630*	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( ph -> E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.40 2631	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.40 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.41 2632	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.)
|- F/ x ps   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.41v 2633*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2003.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.42v 2634*	Restricted version of Theorem 19.42 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( ph /\ E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.43 2635	Restricted version of Theorem 19.43 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2018.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph \/ E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.44av 2636*	One direction of a restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.44 of [Margaris] p. 90. The other direction doesn't hold when A is empty. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) -> ( E. x e. A ph \/ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.45av 2637*	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.45 of [Margaris] p. 90. (The other direction doesn't hold when A is empty.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) -> ( ph \/ E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	ralcomf 2638*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexcomf 2639*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ph <-> E. y e. B E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	ralcom 2640*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexcom 2641*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ph <-> E. y e. B E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	ralrot3 2642*	Rotate three restricted universal quantifiers. (Contributed by AV, 3-Dec-2021.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B A. z e. C ph <-> A. z e. C A. x e. A A. y e. B ph )
Theorem	rexcom13 2643*	Swap 1st and 3rd restricted existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2015.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B E. z e. C ph <-> E. z e. C E. y e. B E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexrot4 2644*	Rotate existential restricted quantifiers twice. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2015.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B E. z e. C E. w e. D ph <-> E. z e. C E. w e. D E. x e. A E. y e. B ph )
Theorem	ralcom3 2645	A commutative law for restricted quantifiers that swaps the domain of the restriction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( x e. B -> ph ) <-> A. x e. B ( x e. A -> ph ) )
Theorem	reean 2646*	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   =>    |- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. y e. B ps ) )
Theorem	reeanv 2647*	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. y e. B ps ) )
Theorem	3reeanv 2648*	Rearrange three existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B E. z e. C ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. y e. B ps /\ E. z e. C ch ) )
Theorem	nfreu1 2649	x is not free in E! x e. A ph. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
|- F/ x E! x e. A ph
Theorem	nfrmo1 2650	x is not free in E* x e. A ph. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- F/ x E* x e. A ph
Theorem	nfreudxy 2651*	Not-free deduction for restricted uniqueness. This is a version where x and y are distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jun-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x E! y e. A ps )
Theorem	nfreuxy 2652*	Not-free for restricted uniqueness. This is a version where x and y are distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jun-2018.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/ x E! y e. A ph
Theorem	rabid 2653	An "identity" law of concretion for restricted abstraction. Special case of Definition 2.1 of [Quine] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.)
|- ( x e. { x e. A | ph } <-> ( x e. A /\ ph ) )
Theorem	rabid2 2654*	An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
|- ( A = { x e. A | ph } <-> A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rabbi 2655	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal restricted class abstractions. Closed theorem form of rabbidva 2727. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( ps <-> ch ) <-> { x e. A | ps } = { x e. A | ch } )
Theorem	rabswap 2656	Swap with a membership relation in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2005.)
|- { x e. A | x e. B } = { x e. B | x e. A }
Theorem	nfrab1 2657	The abstraction variable in a restricted class abstraction isn't free. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
|- F/_ x { x e. A | ph }
Theorem	nfrabxy 2658*	A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2018.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x { y e. A | ph }
Theorem	reubida 2659	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E! x e. A ps <-> E! x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	reubidva 2660*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2004.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E! x e. A ps <-> E! x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	reubidv 2661*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E! x e. A ps <-> E! x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	reubiia 2662	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2004.)
|- ( x e. A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. A ps )
Theorem	reubii 2663	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-1999.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. A ps )
Theorem	rmobida 2664	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E* x e. A ps <-> E* x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	rmobidva 2665*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E* x e. A ps <-> E* x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	rmobidv 2666*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E* x e. A ps <-> E* x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	rmobiia 2667	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( x e. A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. A ps )
Theorem	rmobii 2668	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. A ps )
Theorem	raleqf 2669	Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	rexeqf 2670	Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	reueq1f 2671	Equality theorem for restricted unique existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	rmoeq1f 2672	Equality theorem for restricted at-most-one quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	raleq 2673*	Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
|- ( A = B -> ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	rexeq 2674*	Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.)
|- ( A = B -> ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	reueq1 2675*	Equality theorem for restricted unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A = B -> ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	rmoeq1 2676*	Equality theorem for restricted at-most-one quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( A = B -> ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	raleqi 2677*	Equality inference for restricted universal qualifier. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. B ph )
Theorem	rexeqi 2678*	Equality inference for restricted existential qualifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. B ph )
Theorem	raleqdv 2679*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2005.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	rexeqdv 2680*	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2007.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	raleqbi1dv 2681*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	rexeqbi1dv 2682*	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-1997.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	reueqd 2683*	Equality deduction for restricted unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	rmoeqd 2684*	Equality deduction for restricted at-most-one quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	raleqbidv 2685*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	rexeqbidv 2686*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	raleqbidva 2687*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	rexeqbidva 2688*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	mormo 2689	Unrestricted "at most one" implies restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E* x ph -> E* x e. A ph )
Theorem	reu5 2690	Restricted uniqueness in terms of "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E* x e. A ph ) )
Theorem	reurex 2691	Restricted unique existence implies restricted existence. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1999.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph -> E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	reurmo 2692	Restricted existential uniqueness implies restricted "at most one." (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph -> E* x e. A ph )
Theorem	rmo5 2693	Restricted "at most one" in term of uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E* x e. A ph <-> ( E. x e. A ph -> E! x e. A ph ) )
Theorem	nrexrmo 2694	Nonexistence implies restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( -. E. x e. A ph -> E* x e. A ph )
Theorem	cbvralfw 2695*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvralf 2697 with a disjoint variable condition. Although we don't do so yet, we expect this disjoint variable condition will allow us to remove reliance on ax-i12 1507 and ax-bndl 1509 in the proof. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 23-May-2024.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrexfw 2696*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrexf 2698 with a disjoint variable condition. Although we don't do so yet, we expect this disjoint variable condition will allow us to remove reliance on ax-i12 1507 and ax-bndl 1509 in the proof. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvralf 2697	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrexf 2698	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jun-2018.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvralw 2699*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvral 2701 with a disjoint variable condition. Although we don't do so yet, we expect this disjoint variable condition will allow us to remove reliance on ax-i12 1507 and ax-bndl 1509 in the proof. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrexw 2700*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrexfw 2696 with more disjoint variable conditions. Although we don't do so yet, we expect the disjoint variable conditions will allow us to remove reliance on ax-i12 1507 and ax-bndl 1509 in the proof. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 10-Jan-2024.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )