Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 3501-3600 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Theorem | abanssl 3501 |
A class abstraction with a conjunction is a subset of the class
abstraction with the left conjunct only. (Contributed by AV,
7-Aug-2024.) (Proof shortened by SN, 22-Aug-2024.)
|
 
     |
| |
| Theorem | abanssr 3502 |
A class abstraction with a conjunction is a subset of the class
abstraction with the right conjunct only. (Contributed by AV,
7-Aug-2024.) (Proof shortened by SN, 22-Aug-2024.)
|
 
     |
| |
| Theorem | notab 3503 |
A class builder defined by a negation. (Contributed by FL,
18-Sep-2010.)
|
       |
| |
| Theorem | unrab 3504 |
Union of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM,
25-Mar-2004.)
|
      
    |
| |
| Theorem | inrab 3505 |
Intersection of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM,
1-Sep-2006.)
|
      
    |
| |
| Theorem | inrab2 3506* |
Intersection with a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM,
19-Nov-2007.)
|
      
  |
| |
| Theorem | difrab 3507 |
Difference of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM,
23-Oct-2004.)
|
   
       |
| |
| Theorem | dfrab2 3508* |
Alternate definition of restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by
NM, 20-Sep-2003.)
|
       |
| |
| Theorem | dfrab3 3509* |
Alternate definition of restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|
       |
| |
| Theorem | notrab 3510* |
Complementation of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
|
 
  
  |
| |
| Theorem | dfrab3ss 3511* |
Restricted class abstraction with a common superset. (Contributed by
Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2015.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
8-Nov-2015.)
|
         |
| |
| Theorem | rabun2 3512 |
Abstraction restricted to a union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
5-Feb-2015.)
|
   
 
 
   |
| |
| 2.1.13.6 Restricted uniqueness with difference,
union, and intersection
|
| |
| Theorem | reuss2 3513* |
Transfer uniqueness to a smaller subclass. (Contributed by NM,
20-Oct-2005.)
|
   
        
  |
| |
| Theorem | reuss 3514* |
Transfer uniqueness to a smaller subclass. (Contributed by NM,
21-Aug-1999.)
|
  
  
  |
| |
| Theorem | reuun1 3515* |
Transfer uniqueness to a smaller class. (Contributed by NM,
21-Oct-2005.)
|
  
       
  |
| |
| Theorem | reuun2 3516* |
Transfer uniqueness to a smaller or larger class. (Contributed by NM,
21-Oct-2005.)
|
 
     
   |
| |
| Theorem | reupick 3517* |
Restricted uniqueness "picks" a member of a subclass. (Contributed
by
NM, 21-Aug-1999.)
|
    
        |
| |
| Theorem | reupick3 3518* |
Restricted uniqueness "picks" a member of a subclass. (Contributed
by
Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
|
  
        |
| |
| Theorem | reupick2 3519* |
Restricted uniqueness "picks" a member of a subclass. (Contributed
by
Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
19-Nov-2016.)
|
   
  
       |
| |
| 2.1.14 The empty set
|
| |
| Syntax | c0 3520 |
Extend class notation to include the empty set.
|
 |
| |
| Definition | df-nul 3521 |
Define the empty set. Special case of Exercise 4.10(o) of [Mendelson]
p. 231. For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy
variable, see dfnul2 3523. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | dfnul4 3522 |
Alternate definition of the empty class/set. (Contributed by BJ,
30-Nov-2019.) Avoid ax-13 2211, df-clel 2234. (Revised by GG, 3-Sep-2024.)
Prove directly from definition to allow shortening dfnul2 3523. (Revised by
BJ, 23-Sep-2024.)
|
  |
| |
| Theorem | dfnul2 3523 |
Alternate definition of the empty set. Definition 5.14 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1996.) Reduce axiom dependencies.
(Revised by Steven Nguyen, 3-May-2023.) (Proof shortened by BJ,
23-Sep-2024.)
|

  |
| |
| Theorem | dfnul3 3524 |
Alternate definition of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
(Proof shortened by BJ, 23-Sep-2024.)
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | noel 3525 |
The empty set has no elements. Theorem 6.14 of [Quine] p. 44.
(Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
1-Sep-2015.)
|
 |
| |
| Theorem | nel02 3526 |
The empty set has no elements. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa,
4-Jan-2018.)
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | n0i 3527 |
If a set has elements, it is not empty. A set with elements is also
inhabited, see elex2 2838. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | ne0i 3528 |
If a set has elements, it is not empty. A set with elements is also
inhabited, see elex2 2838. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | ne0d 3529 |
Deduction form of ne0i 3528. If a class has elements, then it is
nonempty. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
|
     |
| |
| Theorem | n0ii 3530 |
If a class has elements, then it is not empty. Inference associated
with n0i 3527. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Jul-2021.)
|
 |
| |
| Theorem | ne0ii 3531 |
If a class has elements, then it is nonempty. Inference associated with
ne0i 3528. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
11-Dec-2019.)
|
 |
| |
| Theorem | vn0 3532 |
The universal class is not equal to the empty set. (Contributed by NM,
11-Sep-2008.)
|
 |
| |
| Theorem | vn0m 3533 |
The universal class is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
17-Dec-2018.)
|
  |
| |
| Theorem | n0rf 3534 |
An inhabited class is nonempty. Following the Definition of [Bauer],
p. 483, we call a class nonempty if and inhabited
if
it has at least one element. In classical logic these two concepts are
equivalent, for example see Proposition 5.17(1) of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 20. This version of n0r 3535 requires only that not be free in,
rather than not occur in, . (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
31-Jul-2018.)
|
      |
| |
| Theorem | n0r 3535* |
An inhabited class is nonempty. See n0rf 3534 for more discussion.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2018.)
|
    |
| |
| Theorem | neq0r 3536* |
An inhabited class is nonempty. See n0rf 3534 for more discussion.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2018.)
|
    |
| |
| Theorem | reximdva0m 3537* |
Restricted existence deduced from inhabited class. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 31-Jul-2018.)
|
     

    |
| |
| Theorem | n0mmoeu 3538* |
A case of equivalence of "at most one" and "only one". If
a class is
inhabited, that class having at most one element is equivalent to it
having only one element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2018.)
|
   
    |
| |
| Theorem | rex0 3539 |
Vacuous existential quantification is false. (Contributed by NM,
15-Oct-2003.)
|
  |
| |
| Theorem | eq0 3540* |
The empty set has no elements. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 22.
(Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-1993.)
|
    |
| |
| Theorem | eqv 3541* |
The universe contains every set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2006.)
|
 
  |
| |
| Theorem | notm0 3542* |
A class is not inhabited if and only if it is empty. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|
 
  |
| |
| Theorem | nel0 3543* |
From the general negation of membership in , infer that is
the empty set. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
|
 |
| |
| Theorem | 0el 3544* |
Membership of the empty set in another class. (Contributed by NM,
29-Jun-2004.)
|

    |
| |
| Theorem | abvor0dc 3545* |
The class builder of a decidable proposition not containing the
abstraction variable is either the universal class or the empty set.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Aug-2018.)
|
DECID         |
| |
| Theorem | abn0r 3546 |
Nonempty class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Aug-2018.)
|
       |
| |
| Theorem | abn0m 3547* |
Inhabited class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
8-Jul-2022.)
|
        |
| |
| Theorem | rabn0r 3548 |
Nonempty restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
1-Aug-2018.)
|
 
    |
| |
| Theorem | rabn0m 3549* |
Inhabited restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
18-Sep-2018.)
|
       |
| |
| Theorem | ab0w 3550* |
The class of sets verifying a property is the empty class if and only if
that property is a contradiction. (Contributed by GG, 3-Oct-2024.)
|
          |
| |
| Theorem | rab0 3551 |
Any restricted class abstraction restricted to the empty set is empty.
(Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon,
26-Jun-2011.)
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | rabeq0 3552 |
Condition for a restricted class abstraction to be empty. (Contributed
by Jeff Madsen, 7-Jun-2010.)
|
      |
| |
| Theorem | abeq0 3553 |
Condition for a class abstraction to be empty. (Contributed by Jim
Kingdon, 12-Aug-2018.)
|
      |
| |
| Theorem | rabxmdc 3554* |
Law of excluded middle given decidability, in terms of restricted class
abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.) (Revised by
Jim Kingdon, 17-Jun-2026.)
|
  DECID    
    |
| |
| Theorem | rabnc 3555* |
Law of noncontradiction, in terms of restricted class abstractions.
(Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.)
|
       |
| |
| Theorem | un0 3556 |
The union of a class with the empty set is itself. Dual of inv1 3559.
Theorem 24 of [Suppes] p. 27.
(Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | in0 3557 |
The intersection of a class with the empty set is the empty set. Dual
of unv 3560. Commuted form of 0in 3558.
Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 26.
(Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | 0in 3558 |
The intersection of the empty set with a class is the empty set. Commuted
form of in0 3557. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi,
17-Aug-2020.)
|

  |
| |
| Theorem | inv1 3559 |
The intersection of a class with the universal class is itself. Dual of
un0 3556. Exercise 4.10(k) of [Mendelson] p. 231. (Contributed by NM,
17-May-1998.)
|
 
 |
| |
| Theorem | unv 3560 |
The union of a class with the universal class is the universal class.
Dual of in0 3557. Exercise 4.10(l) of [Mendelson] p. 231. (Contributed by
NM, 17-May-1998.)
|
 
 |
| |
| Theorem | 0ss 3561 |
The empty set is a subset of any class. Dual of ssv 3270.
Part of
Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p.
22. (Contributed by NM,
5-Aug-1993.)
|
 |
| |
| Theorem | ss0b 3562 |
Any subset of the empty set is empty. Dual of vss 3567.
Theorem 5 of
[Suppes] p. 23 and its converse.
(Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
|

  |
| |
| Theorem | ss0 3563 |
Any subset of the empty set is empty. Theorem 5 of [Suppes] p. 23.
(Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1994.)
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | sseq0 3564 |
A subclass of an empty class is empty. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2007.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|
     |
| |
| Theorem | ssn0 3565 |
A class with a nonempty subclass is nonempty. (Contributed by NM,
17-Feb-2007.)
|
     |
| |
| Theorem | un00 3566 |
Two classes are both empty if and only if their union is empty. Dual of
vvin 3568. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
|
    
  |
| |
| Theorem | vss 3567 |
Only the universal class has the universal class as a subclass. Dual of
ss0b 3562. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.) (Proof
shortened by Andrew
Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | vvin 3568 |
Two classes are both the universal class if and only if their intersection
is the universal class. Dual of un00 3566. (Contributed by BJ,
12-Jul-2026.)
|
    
  |
| |
| Theorem | abf 3569 |
A class builder with a false argument is empty. (Contributed by NM,
20-Jan-2012.)
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | eq0rdv 3570* |
Deduction for equality to the empty set. (Contributed by NM,
11-Jul-2014.)
|
     |
| |
| Theorem | csbprc 3571 |
The proper substitution of a proper class for a set into a class results
in the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2018.)
|
   ![]_ ]_](_urbrack.gif)   |
| |
| Theorem | disj 3572* |
Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint (have no members in
common). (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.)
|
   
  |
| |
| Theorem | disjr 3573* |
Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by Jeff
Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
|
   
  |
| |
| Theorem | disj1 3574* |
Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint (have no members in
common). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.)
|
         |
| |
| Theorem | reldisj 3575 |
Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint, using the complement
of relative to
a universe .
(Contributed by NM,
15-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|
   
     |
| |
| Theorem | disj3 3576 |
Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by NM,
19-May-1998.)
|
  
    |
| |
| Theorem | disjne 3577 |
Members of disjoint sets are not equal. (Contributed by NM,
28-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|
       |
| |
| Theorem | disjel 3578 |
A set can't belong to both members of disjoint classes. (Contributed by
NM, 28-Feb-2015.)
|
    
  |
| |
| Theorem | disj2 3579 |
Two ways of saying that two classes are disjoint. (Contributed by NM,
17-May-1998.)
|
  
    |
| |
| Theorem | ssdisj 3580 |
Intersection with a subclass of a disjoint class. (Contributed by FL,
24-Jan-2007.)
|
     
   |
| |
| Theorem | undisj1 3581 |
The union of disjoint classes is disjoint. (Contributed by NM,
26-Sep-2004.)
|
             |
| |
| Theorem | undisj2 3582 |
The union of disjoint classes is disjoint. (Contributed by NM,
13-Sep-2004.)
|
        
 
  |
| |
| Theorem | ssindif0im 3583 |
Subclass implies empty intersection with difference from the universal
class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
|
       |
| |
| Theorem | inelcm 3584 |
The intersection of classes with a common member is nonempty.
(Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1994.)
|
       |
| |
| Theorem | minel 3585 |
A minimum element of a class has no elements in common with the class.
(Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1994.)
|
       |
| |
| Theorem | undif4 3586 |
Distribute union over difference. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|
         
   |
| |
| Theorem | disjssun 3587 |
Subset relation for disjoint classes. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2005.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|
     
   |
| |
| Theorem | ssdif0im 3588 |
Subclass implies empty difference. One direction of Exercise 7 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 22. In
classical logic this would be an equivalence.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2018.)
|
  
  |
| |
| Theorem | vdif0im 3589 |
Universal class equality in terms of empty difference. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 3-Aug-2018.)
|
  
  |
| |
| Theorem | difrab0eqim 3590* |
If the difference between the restricting class of a restricted class
abstraction and the restricted class abstraction is empty, the
restricting class is equal to this restricted class abstraction.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Aug-2018.)
|
 

      |
| |
| Theorem | inssdif0im 3591 |
Intersection, subclass, and difference relationship. In classical logic
the converse would also hold. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
3-Aug-2018.)
|
  
      |
| |
| Theorem | difid 3592 |
The difference between a class and itself is the empty set. Proposition
5.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 20. Also
Theorem 32 of [Suppes] p. 28.
(Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.)
|
 
 |
| |
| Theorem | difidALT 3593 |
The difference between a class and itself is the empty set. Proposition
5.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 20.
Also Theorem 32 of [Suppes] p. 28.
Alternate proof of difid 3592. (Contributed by David Abernethy,
17-Jun-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
 
 |
| |
| Theorem | dif0 3594 |
The difference between a class and the empty set. Part of Exercise 4.4 of
[Stoll] p. 16. (Contributed by NM,
17-Aug-2004.)
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | 0dif 3595 |
The difference between the empty set and a class. Part of Exercise 4.4 of
[Stoll] p. 16. (Contributed by NM,
17-Aug-2004.)
|

  |
| |
| Theorem | disjdif 3596 |
A class and its relative complement are disjoint. Theorem 38 of [Suppes]
p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.)
|
     |
| |
| Theorem | disjdifr 3597 |
A class and its relative complement are disjoint. (Contributed by Thierry
Arnoux, 29-Nov-2023.)
|
  
  |
| |
| Theorem | difin0 3598 |
The difference of a class from its intersection is empty. Theorem 37 of
[Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM,
17-Aug-2004.) (Proof shortened by
Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|
     |
| |
| Theorem | undif1ss 3599 |
Absorption of difference by union. In classical logic, as Theorem 35 of
[Suppes] p. 29, this would be equality
rather than subset. (Contributed
by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)
|
  
    |
| |
| Theorem | undif2ss 3600 |
Absorption of difference by union. In classical logic, as in Part of
proof of Corollary 6K of [Enderton] p.
144, this would be equality rather
than subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)
|
       |