P. 36 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 3501-3600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ifcldadc 3501	Conditional closure. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> A e. C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ -. ps ) -> B e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> DECID ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> if ( ps , A , B ) e. C )
Theorem	ifeq1dadc 3502	Conditional equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> DECID ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> if ( ps , A , C ) = if ( ps , B , C ) )
Theorem	ifbothdadc 3503	A formula th containing a decidable conditional operator is true when both of its cases are true. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jun-2022.)
|- ( A = if ( ph , A , B ) -> ( ps <-> th ) )   &    |- ( B = if ( ph , A , B ) -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ( et /\ ph ) -> ps )   &    |- ( ( et /\ -. ph ) -> ch )   &    |- ( et -> DECID ph )   =>    |- ( et -> th )
Theorem	ifbothdc 3504	A wff th containing a conditional operator is true when both of its cases are true. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2021.)
|- ( A = if ( ph , A , B ) -> ( ps <-> th ) )   &    |- ( B = if ( ph , A , B ) -> ( ch <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( ( ps /\ ch /\ DECID ph ) -> th )
Theorem	ifiddc 3505	Identical true and false arguments in the conditional operator. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2005.)
|- (DECID ph -> if ( ph , A , A ) = A )
Theorem	eqifdc 3506	Expansion of an equality with a conditional operator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2022.)
|- (DECID ph -> ( A = if ( ph , B , C ) <-> ( ( ph /\ A = B ) \/ ( -. ph /\ A = C ) ) ) )
Theorem	ifcldcd 3507	Membership (closure) of a conditional operator, deduction form. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2021.)
|- ( ph -> A e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> DECID ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> if ( ps , A , B ) e. C )
Theorem	ifandc 3508	Rewrite a conjunction in a conditional as two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- (DECID ph -> if ( ( ph /\ ps ) , A , B ) = if ( ph , if ( ps , A , B ) , B ) )
Theorem	ifmdc 3509	If a conditional class is inhabited, then the condition is decidable. This shows that conditionals are not very useful unless one can prove the condition decidable. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Sep-2022.)
|- ( A e. if ( ph , B , C ) -> DECID ph )
2.1.16  Power classes
Syntax	cpw 3510	Extend class notation to include power class. (The tilde in the Metamath token is meant to suggest the calligraphic font of the P.)
class ~P A
Theorem	pwjust 3511*	Soundness justification theorem for df-pw 3512. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- { x | x C_ A } = { y | y C_ A }
Definition	df-pw 3512*	Define power class. Definition 5.10 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17, but we also let it apply to proper classes, i.e. those that are not members of _V. When applied to a set, this produces its power set. A power set of S is the set of all subsets of S, including the empty set and S itself. For example, if A is { 3 , 5 , 7 }, then ~P A is { (/) , { 3 } , { 5 } , { 7 } , { 3 , 5 } , { 3 , 7 } , { 5 , 7 } , { 3 , 5 , 7 } }. We will later introduce the Axiom of Power Sets. Still later we will prove that the size of the power set of a finite set is 2 raised to the power of the size of the set. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ~P A = { x | x C_ A }
Theorem	pweq 3513	Equality theorem for power class. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> ~P A = ~P B )
Theorem	pweqi 3514	Equality inference for power class. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2013.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ~P A = ~P B
Theorem	pweqd 3515	Equality deduction for power class. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-2013.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ~P A = ~P B )
Theorem	elpw 3516	Membership in a power class. Theorem 86 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. ~P B <-> A C_ B )
Theorem	velpw 3517*	Setvar variable membership in a power class (common case). See elpw 3516. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- ( x e. ~P A <-> x C_ A )
Theorem	elpwg 3518	Membership in a power class. Theorem 86 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2000.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. ~P B <-> A C_ B ) )
Theorem	elpwi 3519	Subset relation implied by membership in a power class. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2007.)
|- ( A e. ~P B -> A C_ B )
Theorem	elpwb 3520	Characterization of the elements of a power class. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Apr-2021.)
|- ( A e. ~P B <-> ( A e. _V /\ A C_ B ) )
Theorem	elpwid 3521	An element of a power class is a subclass. Deduction form of elpwi 3519. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ~P B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A C_ B )
Theorem	elelpwi 3522	If A belongs to a part of C then A belongs to C. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ B e. ~P C ) -> A e. C )
Theorem	nfpw 3523	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for power class. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x ~P A
Theorem	pwidg 3524	Membership of the original in a power set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> A e. ~P A )
Theorem	pwid 3525	A set is a member of its power class. Theorem 87 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A e. ~P A
Theorem	pwss 3526*	Subclass relationship for power class. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2009.)
|- ( ~P A C_ B <-> A. x ( x C_ A -> x e. B ) )
2.1.17  Unordered and ordered pairs
Syntax	csn 3527	Extend class notation to include singleton.
class { A }
Syntax	cpr 3528	Extend class notation to include unordered pair.
class { A , B }
Syntax	ctp 3529	Extend class notation to include unordered triplet.
class { A , B , C }
Syntax	cop 3530	Extend class notation to include ordered pair.
class <. A , B >.
Syntax	cotp 3531	Extend class notation to include ordered triple.
class <. A , B , C >.
Theorem	snjust 3532*	Soundness justification theorem for df-sn 3533. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- { x | x = A } = { y | y = A }
Definition	df-sn 3533*	Define the singleton of a class. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. For convenience, it is well-defined for proper classes, i.e., those that are not elements of _V, although it is not very meaningful in this case. For an alternate definition see dfsn2 3541. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- { A } = { x | x = A }
Definition	df-pr 3534	Define unordered pair of classes. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. They are unordered, so { A , B } = { B , A } as proven by prcom 3599. For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfpr2 3546. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- { A , B } = ( { A } u. { B } )
Definition	df-tp 3535	Define unordered triple of classes. Definition of [Enderton] p. 19. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.)
|- { A , B , C } = ( { A , B } u. { C } )
Definition	df-op 3536*	Definition of an ordered pair, equivalent to Kuratowski's definition { { A } , { A , B } } when the arguments are sets. Since the behavior of Kuratowski definition is not very useful for proper classes, we define it to be empty in this case (see opprc1 3727 and opprc2 3728). For Kuratowski's actual definition when the arguments are sets, see dfop 3704. Definition 9.1 of [Quine] p. 58 defines an ordered pair unconditionally as <. A , B >. = { { A } , { A , B } }, which has different behavior from our df-op 3536 when the arguments are proper classes. Ordinarily this difference is not important, since neither definition is meaningful in that case. Our df-op 3536 was chosen because it often makes proofs shorter by eliminating unnecessary sethood hypotheses. There are other ways to define ordered pairs. The basic requirement is that two ordered pairs are equal iff their respective members are equal. In 1914 Norbert Wiener gave the first successful definition <. A , B >.2 = { { { A } , (/) } , { { B } } }. This was simplified by Kazimierz Kuratowski in 1921 to our present definition. An even simpler definition is <. A , B >.3 = { A , { A , B } }, but it requires the Axiom of Regularity for its justification and is not commonly used. Finally, an ordered pair of real numbers can be represented by a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- <. A , B >. = { x | ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V /\ x e. { { A } , { A , B } } ) }
Definition	df-ot 3537	Define ordered triple of classes. Definition of ordered triple in [Stoll] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
|- <. A , B , C >. = <. <. A , B >. , C >.
Theorem	sneq 3538	Equality theorem for singletons. Part of Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> { A } = { B } )
Theorem	sneqi 3539	Equality inference for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
|- A = B   =>    |- { A } = { B }
Theorem	sneqd 3540	Equality deduction for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A } = { B } )
Theorem	dfsn2 3541	Alternate definition of singleton. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
|- { A } = { A , A }
Theorem	elsng 3542	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15 (generalized). (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { B } <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	elsn 3543	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B } <-> A = B )
Theorem	velsn 3544	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
|- ( x e. { A } <-> x = A )
Theorem	elsni 3545	There is only one element in a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. { B } -> A = B )
Theorem	dfpr2 3546*	Alternate definition of unordered pair. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
|- { A , B } = { x | ( x = A \/ x = B ) }
Theorem	elprg 3547	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15, generalized. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { B , C } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C ) ) )
Theorem	elpr 3548	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B , C } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C ) )
Theorem	elpr2 3549	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B , C } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C ) )
Theorem	elpri 3550	If a class is an element of a pair, then it is one of the two paired elements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Apr-2011.)
|- ( A e. { B , C } -> ( A = B \/ A = C ) )
Theorem	nelpri 3551	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
|- A =/= B   &    |- A =/= C   =>    |- -. A e. { B , C }
Theorem	prneli 3552	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, using e/. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
|- A =/= B   &    |- A =/= C   =>    |- A e/ { B , C }
Theorem	nelprd 3553	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A =/= B )   &    |- ( ph -> A =/= C )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. A e. { B , C } )
Theorem	snidg 3554	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> A e. { A } )
Theorem	snidb 3555	A class is a set iff it is a member of its singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A e. _V <-> A e. { A } )
Theorem	snid 3556	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A e. { A }
Theorem	vsnid 3557	A setvar variable is a member of its singleton (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- x e. { x }
Theorem	elsn2g 3558	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that B, rather than A, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A e. { B } <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	elsn2 3559	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that B, rather than A, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B } <-> A = B )
Theorem	mosn 3560*	A singleton has at most one element. This works whether A is a proper class or not, and in that sense can be seen as encompassing both snmg 3641 and snprc 3588. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2018.)
|- E* x x e. { A }
Theorem	ralsnsg 3561*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	ralsns 3562*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	rexsns 3563*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by NM, 22-Aug-2018.)
|- ( E. x e. { A } ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph )
Theorem	ralsng 3564*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	rexsng 3565*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( E. x e. { A } ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	exsnrex 3566	There is a set being the element of a singleton if and only if there is an element of the singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.)
|- ( E. x M = { x } <-> E. x e. M M = { x } )
Theorem	ralsn 3567*	Convert a quantification over a singleton to a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2009.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> ps )
Theorem	rexsn 3568*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { A } ph <-> ps )
Theorem	eltpg 3569	Members of an unordered triple of classes. (Contributed by FL, 2-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { B , C , D } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C \/ A = D ) ) )
Theorem	eltpi 3570	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A e. { B , C , D } -> ( A = B \/ A = C \/ A = D ) )
Theorem	eltp 3571	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. Special case of Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B , C , D } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C \/ A = D ) )
Theorem	dftp2 3572*	Alternate definition of unordered triple of classes. Special case of Definition 5.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
|- { A , B , C } = { x | ( x = A \/ x = B \/ x = C ) }
Theorem	nfpr 3573	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/_ x { A , B }
Theorem	ralprg 3574*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) ) )
Theorem	rexprg 3575*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( E. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch ) ) )
Theorem	raltpg 3576*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( A. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch /\ th ) ) )
Theorem	rextpg 3577*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( E. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch \/ th ) ) )
Theorem	ralpr 3578*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) )
Theorem	rexpr 3579*	Convert an existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch ) )
Theorem	raltp 3580*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch /\ th ) )
Theorem	rextp 3581*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch \/ th ) )
Theorem	sbcsng 3582*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A. x e. { A } ph ) )
Theorem	nfsn 3583	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x { A }
Theorem	csbsng 3584	Distribute proper substitution through the singleton of a class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.)
|- ( A e. V -> [_ A / x ]_ { B } = { [_ A / x ]_ B } )
Theorem	disjsn 3585	Intersection with the singleton of a non-member is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Sep-2014.)
|- ( ( A i^i { B } ) = (/) <-> -. B e. A )
Theorem	disjsn2 3586	Intersection of distinct singletons is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.)
|- ( A =/= B -> ( { A } i^i { B } ) = (/) )
Theorem	disjpr2 3587	The intersection of distinct unordered pairs is disjoint. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.)
|- ( ( ( A =/= C /\ B =/= C ) /\ ( A =/= D /\ B =/= D ) ) -> ( { A , B } i^i { C , D } ) = (/) )
Theorem	snprc 3588	The singleton of a proper class (one that doesn't exist) is the empty set. Theorem 7.2 of [Quine] p. 48. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( -. A e. _V <-> { A } = (/) )
Theorem	r19.12sn 3589*	Special case of r19.12 2538 where its converse holds. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by BJ, 20-Dec-2021.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( E. x e. { A } A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B E. x e. { A } ph ) )
Theorem	rabsn 3590*	Condition where a restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.)
|- ( B e. A -> { x e. A | x = B } = { B } )
Theorem	rabrsndc 3591*	A class abstraction over a decidable proposition restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2018.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- DECID ph   =>    |- ( M = { x e. { A } | ph } -> ( M = (/) \/ M = { A } ) )
Theorem	euabsn2 3592*	Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
|- ( E! x ph <-> E. y { x | ph } = { y } )
Theorem	euabsn 3593	Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
|- ( E! x ph <-> E. x { x | ph } = { x } )
Theorem	reusn 3594*	A way to express restricted existential uniqueness of a wff: its restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E. y { x e. A | ph } = { y } )
Theorem	absneu 3595	Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ { x | ph } = { A } ) -> E! x ph )
Theorem	rabsneu 3596	Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ { x e. B | ph } = { A } ) -> E! x e. B ph )
Theorem	eusn 3597*	Two ways to express " A is a singleton." (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2010.)
|- ( E! x x e. A <-> E. x A = { x } )
Theorem	rabsnt 3598*	Truth implied by equality of a restricted class abstraction and a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( { x e. A | ph } = { B } -> ps )
Theorem	prcom 3599	Commutative law for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- { A , B } = { B , A }
Theorem	preq1 3600	Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-1998.)
|- ( A = B -> { A , C } = { B , C } )