Theorem rspcimdv 2854

Description: Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv.1	|- ( ph -> A e. B )
rspcimdv.2	|- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv	|- ( ph -> ( A. x e. B ps -> ch ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B   ph, x   ch, x

Allowed substitution hint:   ps( x)

Proof of Theorem rspcimdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ral 2470	. 2 |- ( A. x e. B ps <-> A. x ( x e. B -> ps ) )
2		rspcimdv.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A e. B )
3		simpr 110	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> x = A )
4	3	eleq1d 2256	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( x e. B <-> A e. B ) )
5	4	biimprd 158	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( A e. B -> x e. B ) )
6		rspcimdv.2	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )
7	5, 6	imim12d 74	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( x e. B -> ps ) -> ( A e. B -> ch ) ) )
8	2, 7	spcimdv 2833	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( A. x ( x e. B -> ps ) -> ( A e. B -> ch ) ) )
9	2, 8	mpid 42	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( A. x ( x e. B -> ps ) -> ch ) )
10	1, 9	biimtrid 152	1 |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. B ps -> ch ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   A.wal 1361   = wceq 1363   e. wcel 2158   A.wral 2465

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1457  ax-7 1458  ax-gen 1459  ax-ie1 1503  ax-ie2 1504  ax-8 1514  ax-10 1515  ax-11 1516  ax-i12 1517  ax-bndl 1519  ax-4 1520  ax-17 1536  ax-i9 1540  ax-ial 1544  ax-i5r 1545  ax-ext 2169

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1366  df-nf 1471  df-sb 1773  df-clab 2174  df-cleq 2180  df-clel 2183  df-nfc 2318  df-ral 2470  df-v 2751

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcdv  2856