Theorem rspcimdv 2745

Description: Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcimdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcimdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ral 2380	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓))
2		rspcimdv.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
3		simpr 109	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝑥 = 𝐴)
4	3	eleq1d 2168	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	biimprd 157	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
6		rspcimdv.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
7	5, 6	imim12d 74	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜒)))
8	2, 7	spcimdv 2725	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜒)))
9	2, 8	mpid 42	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓) → 𝜒))
10	1, 9	syl5bi 151	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103  ∀wal 1297   = wceq 1299   ∈ wcel 1448  ∀wral 2375

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 671  ax-5 1391  ax-7 1392  ax-gen 1393  ax-ie1 1437  ax-ie2 1438  ax-8 1450  ax-10 1451  ax-11 1452  ax-i12 1453  ax-bndl 1454  ax-4 1455  ax-17 1474  ax-i9 1478  ax-ial 1482  ax-i5r 1483  ax-ext 2082

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1302  df-nf 1405  df-sb 1704  df-clab 2087  df-cleq 2093  df-clel 2096  df-nfc 2229  df-ral 2380  df-v 2643

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcdv  2747