Theorem sb4or 1833

Description: One direction of a simplified definition of substitution when variables are distinct. Similar to sb4 1832 but stronger in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Feb-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb4or	|- ( A. x x = y \/ A. x ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )

Proof of Theorem sb4or

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equs5or 1830	. 2 |- ( A. x x = y \/ ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
2		nfe1 1496	. . . . . 6 |- F/ x E. x ( x = y /\ ph )
3		nfa1 1541	. . . . . 6 |- F/ x A. x ( x = y -> ph )
4	2, 3	nfim 1572	. . . . 5 |- F/ x ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )
5	4	nfri 1519	. . . 4 |- ( ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) -> A. x ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
6		sb1 1766	. . . . 5 |- ( [ y / x ] ph -> E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) )
7	6	imim1i 60	. . . 4 |- ( ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) -> ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
8	5, 7	alrimih 1469	. . 3 |- ( ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) -> A. x ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
9	8	orim2i 761	. 2 |- ( ( A. x x = y \/ ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) -> ( A. x x = y \/ A. x ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )
10	1, 9	ax-mp 5	1 |- ( A. x x = y \/ A. x ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   \/ wo 708   A.wal 1351   E.wex 1492   [wsb 1762

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763

This theorem is referenced by:  sb4bor  1835  nfsb2or  1837