Theorem sbc8g 3005

Description: This is the closest we can get to df-sbc 2998 if we start from dfsbcq 2999 (see its comments) and dfsbcq2 3000. (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbc8g	|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A e. { x | ph } ) )

Proof of Theorem sbc8g

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq 2999	. 2 |- ( y = A -> ( [. y / x ]. ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
2		eleq1 2267	. 2 |- ( y = A -> ( y e. { x | ph } <-> A e. { x | ph } ) )
3		df-clab 2191	. . 3 |- ( y e. { x | ph } <-> [ y / x ] ph )
4		equid 1723	. . . 4 |- y = y
5		dfsbcq2 3000	. . . 4 |- ( y = y -> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [. y / x ]. ph ) )
6	4, 5	ax-mp 5	. . 3 |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [. y / x ]. ph )
7	3, 6	bitr2i 185	. 2 |- ( [. y / x ]. ph <-> y e. { x | ph } )
8	1, 2, 7	vtoclbg 2833	1 |- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A e. { x | ph } ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105   [wsb 1784   e. wcel 2175   {cab 2190   [.wsbc 2997

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1469  ax-7 1470  ax-gen 1471  ax-ie1 1515  ax-ie2 1516  ax-8 1526  ax-10 1527  ax-11 1528  ax-i12 1529  ax-bndl 1531  ax-4 1532  ax-17 1548  ax-i9 1552  ax-ial 1556  ax-i5r 1557  ax-ext 2186

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1375  df-nf 1483  df-sb 1785  df-clab 2191  df-cleq 2197  df-clel 2200  df-nfc 2336  df-v 2773  df-sbc 2998

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-elssuniab  15660