Theorem sbc8g 3036

Description: This is the closest we can get to df-sbc 3029 if we start from dfsbcq 3030 (see its comments) and dfsbcq2 3031. (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbc8g	|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A e. { x | ph } ) )

Proof of Theorem sbc8g

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq 3030	. 2 |- ( y = A -> ( [. y / x ]. ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
2		eleq1 2292	. 2 |- ( y = A -> ( y e. { x | ph } <-> A e. { x | ph } ) )
3		df-clab 2216	. . 3 |- ( y e. { x | ph } <-> [ y / x ] ph )
4		equid 1747	. . . 4 |- y = y
5		dfsbcq2 3031	. . . 4 |- ( y = y -> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [. y / x ]. ph ) )
6	4, 5	ax-mp 5	. . 3 |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [. y / x ]. ph )
7	3, 6	bitr2i 185	. 2 |- ( [. y / x ]. ph <-> y e. { x | ph } )
8	1, 2, 7	vtoclbg 2862	1 |- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A e. { x | ph } ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105   [wsb 1808   e. wcel 2200   {cab 2215   [.wsbc 3028

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-ext 2211

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1398  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-v 2801  df-sbc 3029

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-elssuniab  16155