Theorem dfsb7 1927

Description: An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1704. By introducing a dummy variable 𝑧 in the definiens, we are able to eliminate any distinct variable restrictions among the variables 𝑥, 𝑦, and 𝜑 of the definiendum. No distinct variable conflicts arise because 𝑧 effectively insulates 𝑥 from 𝑦. To achieve this, we use a chain of two substitutions in the form of sb5 1826, first 𝑧 for 𝑥 then 𝑦 for 𝑧. Compare Definition 2.1'' of [Quine] p. 17. Theorem sb7f 1928 provides a version where 𝜑 and 𝑧 don't have to be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfsb7	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem dfsb7

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb5 1826	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
2	1	sbbii 1706	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
3		ax-17 1474	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)
4	3	sbco2v 1881	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
5		sb5 1826	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr3i 209	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  ∃wex 1436  [wsb 1703

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 671  ax-5 1391  ax-7 1392  ax-gen 1393  ax-ie1 1437  ax-ie2 1438  ax-8 1450  ax-10 1451  ax-11 1452  ax-i12 1453  ax-4 1455  ax-17 1474  ax-i9 1478  ax-ial 1482  ax-i5r 1483

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1405  df-sb 1704

This theorem is referenced by: (None)