Theorem sb7f 1965

Description: This version of dfsb7 1964 does not require that 𝜑 and 𝑧 be distinct. This permits it to be used as a definition for substitution in a formalization that omits the logically redundant axiom ax-17 1506 i.e. that doesn't have the concept of a variable not occurring in a wff. (df-sb 1736 is also suitable, but its mixing of free and bound variables is distasteful to some logicians.) (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sb7f.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb7f	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem sb7f

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb5 1859	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
2	1	sbbii 1738	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
3		sb7f.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)
4	3	sbco2vh 1916	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
5		sb5 1859	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr3i 209	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1329  ∃wex 1468  [wsb 1735

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736

This theorem is referenced by: (None)