Theorem opabbid 4069

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal ordered-pair class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opabbid.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
opabbid.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
opabbid.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opabbid	⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem opabbid

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opabbid.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		opabbid.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
3		opabbid.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	anbi2d 464	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
5	2, 4	exbid 1616	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
6	1, 5	exbid 1616	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
7	6	abbidv 2295	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)})
8		df-opab 4066	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
9		df-opab 4066	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2235	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1353  Ⅎwnf 1460  ∃wex 1492  {cab 2163  ⟨cop 3596  {copab 4064

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-11 1506  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-opab 4066

This theorem is referenced by:  opabbidv  4070  mpteq12f  4084  fnoprabg  5976