Theorem 0cnALT 11496

Description: Alternate proof of 0cn 11253 which does not reference ax-1cn 11213. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
0cnALT	⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ

Proof of Theorem 0cnALT

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-icn 11214	. . 3 ⊢ i ∈ ℂ
2		cnre 11258	. . 3 ⊢ (i ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ i = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
3		ax-rnegex 11226	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 + 𝑧) = 0)
4		readdcl 11238	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ℝ) → (𝑥 + 𝑧) ∈ ℝ)
5		eleq1 2829	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 + 𝑧) = 0 → ((𝑥 + 𝑧) ∈ ℝ ↔ 0 ∈ ℝ))
6	4, 5	syl5ibcom 245	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝑥 + 𝑧) = 0 → 0 ∈ ℝ))
7	6	rexlimdva 3155	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 + 𝑧) = 0 → 0 ∈ ℝ))
8	3, 7	mpd 15	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → 0 ∈ ℝ)
9	8	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ i = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦))) → 0 ∈ ℝ)
10	9	rexlimiva 3147	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ i = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)) → 0 ∈ ℝ)
11	1, 2, 10	mp2b 10	. 2 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ
12	11	recni 11275	1 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3070  (class class class)co 7431  ℂcc 11153  ℝcr 11154  0cc0 11155  ici 11157   + caddc 11158   · cmul 11160

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2708  ax-resscn 11212  ax-icn 11214  ax-addrcl 11216  ax-rnegex 11226  ax-cnre 11228

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1780  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-rex 3071  df-ss 3968

This theorem is referenced by: (None)