P. 115 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 11401-11500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	lttri3d 11401	Consequence of trichotomy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	lttri4d 11402	Trichotomy law for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	letri3d 11403	Consequence of trichotomy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)))
Theorem	leloed 11404	'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	eqleltd 11405	Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltlend 11406	'Less than' expressed in terms of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)))
Theorem	lenltd 11407	'Less than or equal to' in terms of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
Theorem	ltnled 11408	'Less than' in terms of 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
Theorem	ltled 11409	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	ltnsymd 11410	'Less than' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
Theorem	nltled 11411	'Not less than ' implies 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	lensymd 11412	'Less than or equal to' implies 'not less than'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)
Theorem	letrid 11413	Trichotomy law for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
Theorem	leltned 11414	'Less than or equal to' implies 'less than' is not 'equals'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))
Theorem	leneltd 11415	'Less than or equal to' and 'not equals' implies 'less than'. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)
Theorem	mulgt0d 11416	The product of two positive numbers is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	ltadd2d 11417	Addition to both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 + 𝐴) < (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	letrd 11418	Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐶)
Theorem	lelttrd 11419	Transitive law deduction for 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	ltadd2dd 11420	Addition to both sides of 'less than'. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) < (𝐶 + 𝐵))
Theorem	ltletrd 11421	Transitive law deduction for 'less than', 'less than or equal to'. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	lttrd 11422	Transitive law deduction for 'less than'. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐶)
Theorem	lelttrdi 11423	If a number is less than another number, and the other number is less than or equal to a third number, the first number is less than the third number. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐵 → 𝐴 < 𝐶))
Theorem	dedekind 11424*	The Dedekind cut theorem. This theorem, which may be used to replace ax-pre-sup 11233 with appropriate adjustments, states that, if 𝐴 completely preceeds 𝐵, then there is some number separating the two of them. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 < 𝑦) → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦))
Theorem	dedekindle 11425*	The Dedekind cut theorem, with the hypothesis weakened to only require non-strict less than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦))
5.2.5  Initial properties of the complex numbers
Theorem	mul12 11426	Commutative/associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	mul32 11427	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵))
Theorem	mul31 11428	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴))
Theorem	mul4 11429	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷)))
Theorem	mul4r 11430	Rearrangement of 4 factors: swap the right factors in the factors of a product of two products. (Contributed by AV, 4-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐷) · (𝐶 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	muladd11 11431	A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((1 + 𝐴) · (1 + 𝐵)) = ((1 + 𝐴) + (𝐵 + (𝐴 · 𝐵))))
Theorem	1p1times 11432	Two times a number. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((1 + 1) · 𝐴) = (𝐴 + 𝐴))
Theorem	peano2cn 11433	A theorem for complex numbers analogous the second Peano postulate peano2nn 12278. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	peano2re 11434	A theorem for reals analogous the second Peano postulate peano2nn 12278. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + 1) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	readdcan 11435	Cancellation law for addition over the reals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐶 + 𝐴) = (𝐶 + 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	00id 11436	0 is its own additive identity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (0 + 0) = 0
Theorem	mul02lem1 11437	Lemma for mul02 11439. If any real does not produce 0 when multiplied by 0, then any complex is equal to double itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (0 · 𝐴) ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐵 = (𝐵 + 𝐵))
Theorem	mul02lem2 11438	Lemma for mul02 11439. Zero times a real is zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	mul02 11439	Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	mul01 11440	Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 · 0) = 0)
Theorem	addrid 11441	0 is an additive identity. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was found to be dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	cnegex 11442*	Existence of the negative of a complex number. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Theorem	cnegex2 11443*	Existence of a left inverse for addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 + 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	addlid 11444	0 is a left identity for addition. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was discovered that it was dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addcan 11445	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	addcan2 11446	Cancellation law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	addcom 11447	Addition commutes. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was found to be dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	addridi 11448	0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴
Theorem	addlidi 11449	0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	mul02i 11450	Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (0 · 𝐴) = 0
Theorem	mul01i 11451	Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · 0) = 0
Theorem	addcomi 11452	Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)
Theorem	addcomli 11453	Addition commutes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 𝐶
Theorem	addcani 11454	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	addcan2i 11455	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2003.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	mul12i 11456	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))
Theorem	mul32i 11457	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵)
Theorem	mul4i 11458	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷))
Theorem	mul02d 11459	Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 · 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	mul01d 11460	Multiplication by 0. Theorem I.6 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 0) = 0)
Theorem	addridd 11461	0 is an additive identity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addlidd 11462	0 is a left identity for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addcomd 11463	Addition commutes. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	addcand 11464	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	addcan2d 11465	Cancellation law for addition. Theorem I.1 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	addcanad 11466	Cancelling a term on the left-hand side of a sum in an equality. Consequence of addcand 11464. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	addcan2ad 11467	Cancelling a term on the right-hand side of a sum in an equality. Consequence of addcan2d 11465. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	addneintrd 11468	Introducing a term on the left-hand side of a sum in a negated equality. Contrapositive of addcanad 11466. Consequence of addcand 11464. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ≠ (𝐴 + 𝐶))
Theorem	addneintr2d 11469	Introducing a term on the right-hand side of a sum in a negated equality. Contrapositive of addcan2ad 11467. Consequence of addcan2d 11465. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐶) ≠ (𝐵 + 𝐶))
Theorem	mul12d 11470	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) = (𝐵 · (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	mul32d 11471	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two factors in a triple product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · 𝐵))
Theorem	mul31d 11472	Commutative/associative law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐶 · 𝐵) · 𝐴))
Theorem	mul4d 11473	Rearrangement of 4 factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · (𝐶 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) · (𝐵 · 𝐷)))
Theorem	muladd11r 11474	A simple product of sums expansion. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 1) · (𝐵 + 1)) = (((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 + 𝐵)) + 1))
Theorem	comraddd 11475	Commute RHS addition, in deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐶 + 𝐵))
Theorem	comraddi 11476	Commute RHS addition. See addcomli 11453 to commute addition on LHS. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 11-Oct-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 + 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 + 𝐵)
Theorem	ltaddneg 11477	Adding a negative number to another number decreases it. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 0 ↔ (𝐵 + 𝐴) < 𝐵))
Theorem	ltaddnegr 11478	Adding a negative number to another number decreases it. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 0 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) < 𝐵))
5.3  Real and complex numbers - basic operations
5.3.1  Addition
Theorem	add12 11479	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	add32 11480	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵))
Theorem	add32r 11481	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum, rearranging the parentheses. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 18-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵))
Theorem	add4 11482	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷)))
Theorem	add42 11483	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2005.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	add12i 11484	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶))
Theorem	add32i 11485	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵)
Theorem	add4i 11486	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷))
Theorem	add42i 11487	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵))
Theorem	add12d 11488	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 + (𝐴 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	add32d 11489	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + 𝐵))
Theorem	add4d 11490	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 + 𝐷)))
Theorem	add42d 11491	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐷 + 𝐵)))
5.3.2  Subtraction
Syntax	cmin 11492	Extend class notation to include subtraction.
class −
Syntax	cneg 11493	Extend class notation to include unary minus. The symbol - is not a class by itself but part of a compound class definition. We do this rather than making it a formal function since it is so commonly used. Note: We use different symbols for unary minus (-) and subtraction cmin 11492 (−) to prevent syntax ambiguity. For example, looking at the syntax definition co 7431, if we used the same symbol then "( − 𝐴 − 𝐵) " could mean either "− 𝐴 " minus "𝐵", or it could represent the (meaningless) operation of classes "− " and "− 𝐵 " connected with "operation" "𝐴". On the other hand, "(-𝐴 − 𝐵) " is unambiguous.
class -𝐴
Definition	df-sub 11494*	Define subtraction. Theorem subval 11499 shows its value (and describes how this definition works), Theorem subaddi 11596 relates it to addition, and Theorems subcli 11585 and resubcli 11571 prove its closure laws. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-1994.)
⊢ − = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ℂ (𝑦 + 𝑧) = 𝑥))
Definition	df-neg 11495	Define the negative of a number (unary minus). We use different symbols for unary minus (-) and subtraction (−) to prevent syntax ambiguity. See cneg 11493 for a discussion of this. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.)
⊢ -𝐴 = (0 − 𝐴)
Theorem	0cnALT 11496	Alternate proof of 0cn 11253 which does not reference ax-1cn 11213. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jan-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	0cnALT2 11497	Alternate proof of 0cnALT 11496 which is shorter, but depends on ax-8 2110, ax-13 2377, ax-sep 5296, ax-nul 5306, ax-pow 5365, ax-pr 5432, ax-un 7755, and every complex number axiom except ax-pre-mulgt0 11232 and ax-pre-sup 11233. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	negeu 11498*	Existential uniqueness of negatives. Theorem I.2 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 𝐵)
Theorem	subval 11499*	Value of subtraction, which is the (unique) element 𝑥 such that 𝐵 + 𝑥 = 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐵 + 𝑥) = 𝐴))
Theorem	negeq 11500	Equality theorem for negatives. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → -𝐴 = -𝐵)