Theorem 19.12 2366

Description: Theorem 19.12 of [Margaris] p. 89. Assuming the converse is a mistake sometimes made by beginners! But sometimes the converse does hold, as in 19.12vv 2385 and r19.12sn 4691. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Jan-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
19.12	⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∃𝑥𝜑)

Proof of Theorem 19.12

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfa1 2192	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦𝜑
2	1	nfex 2363	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∃𝑥∀𝑦𝜑
3		sp 2225	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜑)
4	3	eximi 1862	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜑)
5	2, 4	alrimi 2255	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∃𝑥𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1565  ∃wex 1806

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-or 861  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811

This theorem is referenced by:  nfald  2367  bj-hbexd  37223  bj-hbex  37225  bj-nfald  37666  pm11.61  44994