Theorem axpr 5034

Description: Unabbreviated version of the Axiom of Pairing of ZF set theory, derived as a theorem from the other axioms.

This theorem should not be referenced by any proof. Instead, use ax-pr 5035 below so that the uses of the Axiom of Pairing can be more easily identified. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axpr	⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧,𝑤   𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Proof of Theorem axpr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		zfpair 5033	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V
2	1	isseti 3361	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦}
3		dfcleq 2765	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}))
4		vex 3354	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
5	4	elpr 4339	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
6	5	bibi2i 326	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
7		biimpr 210	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)) → ((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
8	6, 7	sylbi 207	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) → ((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
9	8	alimi 1887	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) → ∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
10	3, 9	sylbi 207	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} → ∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
11	2, 10	eximii 1912	1 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∨ wo 828  ∀wal 1629   = wceq 1631  ∃wex 1852   ∈ wcel 2145  {cpr 4319

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1870  ax-4 1885  ax-5 1991  ax-6 2057  ax-7 2093  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2203  ax-13 2408  ax-ext 2751  ax-rep 4905  ax-sep 4916  ax-nul 4924  ax-pow 4975

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-an 383  df-or 829  df-3an 1073  df-tru 1634  df-ex 1853  df-nf 1858  df-sb 2050  df-clab 2758  df-cleq 2764  df-clel 2767  df-nfc 2902  df-ne 2944  df-v 3353  df-dif 3727  df-un 3729  df-in 3731  df-ss 3738  df-nul 4065  df-pw 4300  df-sn 4318  df-pr 4320

This theorem is referenced by: (None)