Theorem axpr 5360

Description: Unabbreviated version of the Axiom of Pairing of ZF set theory, derived as a theorem from the other axioms.

This theorem should not be referenced by any proof. Instead, use ax-pr 5361 below so that the uses of the Axiom of Pairing can be more easily identified.

For a shorter proof using ax-ext 2707, see axprALT 5354. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.) Remove dependency on ax-ext 2707. (Revised by Rohan Ridenour, 10-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 13-Aug-2023.) Use ax-pr 5361 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axpr	⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧,𝑤   𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Proof of Theorem axpr

Dummy variables 𝑠 𝑝 𝑡 𝑛 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		axprlem3 5357	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
2		biimpr 219	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦))) → (∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
3	2	alimi 1811	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦))) → ∀𝑤(∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
4	1, 3	eximii 1837	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤(∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)
5		axprlem4 5358	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((∀𝑠(∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑡 ¬ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑛 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑝) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑥) → ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
6		axprlem5 5359	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((∀𝑠(∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑡 ¬ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑛 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑝) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
7	5, 6	jaodan 956	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((∀𝑠(∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑡 ¬ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑛 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑝) ∧ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)) → ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
8	7	ex 414	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑠(∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑡 ¬ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑛 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑝) → ((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦))))
9	8	imim1d 82	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑠(∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑡 ¬ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑛 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑝) → ((∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧) → ((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)))
10	9	alimdv 1917	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑠(∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑡 ¬ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑛 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑝) → (∀𝑤(∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧) → ∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)))
11	10	eximdv 1918	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑠(∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑡 ¬ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑛 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑝) → (∃𝑧∀𝑤(∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝑝 ∧ if-(∃𝑛 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠, 𝑤 = 𝑥, 𝑤 = 𝑦)) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧) → ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)))
12	4, 11	mpi 20	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑠(∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑡 ¬ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑛 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑝) → ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
13		axprlem2 5356	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑝∀𝑠(∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑡 ¬ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑛 → 𝑠 ∈ 𝑝)
14	12, 13	exlimiiv 1932	1 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   ∨ wo 845  if-wif 1061  ∀wal 1537  ∃wex 1779  ∀wral 3062

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-9 2114  ax-10 2135  ax-11 2152  ax-12 2169  ax-rep 5218  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5239  ax-pow 5297

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 846  df-ifp 1062  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-ral 3063

This theorem is referenced by: (None)