Theorem trintss 5239

Description: Any nonempty transitive class includes its intersection. Exercise 3 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 44 (which mistakenly does not include the nonemptiness hypothesis). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Nov-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
trintss	⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem trintss

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		n0 4307	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
2		intss1 4930	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥)
3		trss 5230	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴))
4	3	com12 33	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (Tr 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴))
5		sstr2 3945	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴))
6	2, 4, 5	sylsyld 62	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (Tr 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴))
7	6	exlimiv 1963	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (Tr 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴))
8	1, 7	sylbi 220	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (Tr 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴))
9	8	impcom 413	1 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146   ≠ wne 2960   ⊆ wss 3906  ∅c0 4286  ∩ cint 4914  Tr wtr 5220

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2737

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-uni 4875  df-int 4915  df-tr 5221

This theorem is used by: (None)