Theorem trintss 5236

Description: Any nonempty transitive class includes its intersection. Exercise 3 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 44 (which mistakenly does not include the nonemptiness hypothesis). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Nov-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
trintss	⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem trintss

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		n0 4319	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
2		intss1 4930	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥)
3		trss 5228	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴))
4	3	com12 32	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (Tr 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴))
5		sstr2 3956	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴))
6	2, 4, 5	sylsyld 61	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (Tr 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴))
7	6	exlimiv 1930	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (Tr 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴))
8	1, 7	sylbi 217	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (Tr 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴))
9	8	impcom 407	1 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2926   ⊆ wss 3917  ∅c0 4299  ∩ cint 4913  Tr wtr 5217

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2702

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-v 3452  df-dif 3920  df-ss 3934  df-nul 4300  df-uni 4875  df-int 4914  df-tr 5218

This theorem is referenced by: (None)