| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > cp | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Collection Principle. This remarkable theorem scheme is in effect a very strong generalization of the Axiom of Replacement. The proof makes use of Scott's trick scottex 9858 that collapses a proper class into a set of minimum rank. The wff 𝜑 can be thought of as 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦). Scheme "Collection Principle" of [Jech] p. 72. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2003.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| cp | ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vex 3467 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V | |
| 2 | 1 | cplem2 9875 | . 2 ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) |
| 3 | abn0 4348 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑) | |
| 4 | elin 3929 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)) | |
| 5 | abid 2751 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
| 6 | 5 | anbi1i 635 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)) |
| 7 | ancom 465 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3bitri 300 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 9 | 8 | exbii 1875 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 10 | nfab1 2933 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 11 | nfcv 2931 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤 | |
| 12 | 10, 11 | nfin 4185 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) |
| 13 | 12 | n0f 4311 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤)) |
| 14 | df-rex 3096 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 15 | 9, 13, 14 | 3bitr4i 306 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
| 16 | 3, 15 | imbi12i 353 | . . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
| 17 | 16 | ralbii 3117 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
| 18 | 17 | exbii 1875 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
| 19 | 2, 18 | mpbi 233 | 1 ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 400 ∃wex 1806 ∈ wcel 2149 {cab 2747 ≠ wne 2964 ∀wral 3085 ∃wrex 3095 ∩ cin 3912 ∅c0 4294 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1822 ax-4 1836 ax-5 1937 ax-6 1994 ax-7 2035 ax-8 2151 ax-9 2159 ax-10 2182 ax-11 2198 ax-12 2219 ax-ext 2741 ax-rep 5242 ax-sep 5261 ax-nul 5271 ax-pow 5337 ax-pr 5405 ax-un 7733 ax-reg 9553 ax-inf2 9609 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3or 1102 df-3an 1103 df-tru 1570 df-fal 1580 df-ex 1807 df-nf 1811 df-sb 2098 df-mo 2573 df-eu 2603 df-clab 2748 df-cleq 2761 df-clel 2844 df-nfc 2918 df-ne 2965 df-ral 3086 df-rex 3096 df-reu 3377 df-rab 3424 df-v 3465 df-sbc 3754 df-csb 3862 df-dif 3916 df-un 3918 df-in 3920 df-ss 3930 df-pss 3933 df-nul 4295 df-if 4493 df-pw 4569 df-sn 4595 df-pr 4597 df-op 4601 df-uni 4877 df-int 4917 df-iun 4962 df-iin 4963 df-br 5114 df-opab 5178 df-mpt 5197 df-tr 5223 df-id 5557 df-eprel 5562 df-po 5570 df-so 5571 df-fr 5615 df-we 5617 df-xp 5668 df-rel 5669 df-cnv 5670 df-co 5671 df-dm 5672 df-rn 5673 df-res 5674 df-ima 5675 df-pred 6303 df-ord 6364 df-on 6365 df-lim 6366 df-suc 6367 df-iota 6493 df-fun 6539 df-fn 6540 df-f 6541 df-f1 6542 df-fo 6543 df-f1o 6544 df-fv 6545 df-ov 7414 df-om 7862 df-2nd 7986 df-frecs 8277 df-wrecs 8308 df-recs 8357 df-rdg 8396 df-r1 9735 df-rank 9736 |
| This theorem is referenced by: bnd 9877 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |