| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > cp | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Collection Principle. This remarkable theorem scheme is in effect a very strong generalization of the Axiom of Replacement. The proof makes use of Scott's trick scottex 9855 that collapses a proper class into a set of minimum rank. The wff 𝜑 can be thought of as 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦). Scheme "Collection Principle" of [Jech] p. 72. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2003.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| cp | ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vex 3459 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V | |
| 2 | 1 | cplem2 9872 | . 2 ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) |
| 3 | abn0 4341 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑) | |
| 4 | elin 3921 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)) | |
| 5 | abid 2745 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
| 6 | 5 | anbi1i 635 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)) |
| 7 | ancom 465 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3bitri 300 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 9 | 8 | exbii 1878 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 10 | nfab1 2927 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 11 | nfcv 2925 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤 | |
| 12 | 10, 11 | nfin 4177 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) |
| 13 | 12 | n0f 4303 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤)) |
| 14 | df-rex 3090 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 15 | 9, 13, 14 | 3bitr4i 306 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
| 16 | 3, 15 | imbi12i 353 | . . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
| 17 | 16 | ralbii 3111 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
| 18 | 17 | exbii 1878 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
| 19 | 2, 18 | mpbi 233 | 1 ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 400 ∃wex 1809 ∈ wcel 2143 {cab 2741 ≠ wne 2958 ∀wral 3079 ∃wrex 3089 ∩ cin 3904 ∅c0 4286 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1825 ax-4 1839 ax-5 1940 ax-6 1997 ax-7 2038 ax-8 2145 ax-9 2153 ax-10 2176 ax-11 2192 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2735 ax-rep 5238 ax-sep 5257 ax-nul 5269 ax-pow 5336 ax-pr 5404 ax-un 7732 ax-reg 9550 ax-inf2 9606 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1810 df-nf 1814 df-sb 2097 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2838 df-nfc 2912 df-ne 2959 df-ral 3080 df-rex 3090 df-reu 3370 df-rab 3417 df-v 3457 df-sbc 3745 df-csb 3854 df-dif 3908 df-un 3910 df-in 3912 df-ss 3922 df-pss 3925 df-nul 4287 df-if 4488 df-pw 4564 df-sn 4590 df-pr 4592 df-op 4596 df-uni 4873 df-int 4913 df-iun 4958 df-iin 4959 df-br 5110 df-opab 5174 df-mpt 5193 df-tr 5219 df-id 5556 df-eprel 5561 df-po 5569 df-so 5570 df-fr 5614 df-we 5616 df-xp 5667 df-rel 5668 df-cnv 5669 df-co 5670 df-dm 5671 df-rn 5672 df-res 5673 df-ima 5674 df-pred 6302 df-ord 6363 df-on 6364 df-lim 6365 df-suc 6366 df-iota 6492 df-fun 6538 df-fn 6539 df-f 6540 df-f1 6541 df-fo 6542 df-f1o 6543 df-fv 6544 df-ov 7413 df-om 7859 df-2nd 7983 df-frecs 8274 df-wrecs 8305 df-recs 8354 df-rdg 8393 df-r1 9732 df-rank 9733 |
| This theorem is referenced by: bnd 9874 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |