| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > cp | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Collection Principle. This remarkable theorem scheme is in effect a very strong generalization of the Axiom of Replacement. The proof makes use of Scott's trick scottex 9843 that collapses a proper class into a set of minimum rank. The wff 𝜑 can be thought of as 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦). Scheme "Collection Principle" of [Jech] p. 72. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2003.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| cp | ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vex 3458 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V | |
| 2 | 1 | cplem2 9848 | . 2 ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) |
| 3 | abn0 4338 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑) | |
| 4 | elin 3920 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)) | |
| 5 | abid 2744 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
| 6 | 5 | anbi1i 633 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)) |
| 7 | ancom 464 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3bitri 299 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 9 | 8 | exbii 1868 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 10 | nfab1 2926 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 11 | nfcv 2924 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤 | |
| 12 | 10, 11 | nfin 4176 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) |
| 13 | 12 | n0f 4301 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤)) |
| 14 | df-rex 3087 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 15 | 9, 13, 14 | 3bitr4i 305 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
| 16 | 3, 15 | imbi12i 352 | . . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
| 17 | 16 | ralbii 3108 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
| 18 | 17 | exbii 1868 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
| 19 | 2, 18 | mpbi 232 | 1 ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 399 ∃wex 1799 ∈ wcel 2142 {cab 2740 ≠ wne 2957 ∀wral 3076 ∃wrex 3086 ∩ cin 3903 ∅c0 4285 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1815 ax-4 1829 ax-5 1930 ax-6 1987 ax-7 2028 ax-8 2144 ax-9 2152 ax-10 2175 ax-11 2191 ax-12 2212 ax-ext 2734 ax-rep 5227 ax-sep 5246 ax-nul 5256 ax-pow 5322 ax-pr 5390 ax-un 7718 ax-reg 9540 ax-inf2 9596 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-or 859 df-3or 1099 df-3an 1100 df-tru 1563 df-fal 1573 df-ex 1800 df-nf 1804 df-sb 2091 df-mo 2566 df-eu 2596 df-clab 2741 df-cleq 2754 df-clel 2837 df-nfc 2911 df-ne 2958 df-ral 3077 df-rex 3087 df-reu 3368 df-rab 3415 df-v 3456 df-sbc 3745 df-csb 3853 df-dif 3907 df-un 3909 df-in 3911 df-ss 3921 df-pss 3924 df-nul 4286 df-if 4481 df-pw 4557 df-sn 4583 df-pr 4585 df-op 4589 df-uni 4866 df-int 4906 df-iun 4951 df-iin 4952 df-br 5101 df-opab 5163 df-mpt 5182 df-tr 5208 df-id 5542 df-eprel 5547 df-po 5555 df-so 5556 df-fr 5600 df-we 5602 df-xp 5653 df-rel 5654 df-cnv 5655 df-co 5656 df-dm 5657 df-rn 5658 df-res 5659 df-ima 5660 df-pred 6288 df-ord 6349 df-on 6350 df-lim 6351 df-suc 6352 df-iota 6477 df-fun 6523 df-fn 6524 df-f 6525 df-f1 6526 df-fo 6527 df-f1o 6528 df-fv 6529 df-ov 7399 df-om 7847 df-2nd 7971 df-frecs 8262 df-wrecs 8293 df-recs 8342 df-rdg 8381 df-r1 9722 df-rank 9723 |
| This theorem is referenced by: bnd 9850 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |