![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > cp | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Collection Principle. This remarkable theorem scheme is in effect a very strong generalization of the Axiom of Replacement. The proof makes use of Scott's trick scottex 9877 that collapses a proper class into a set of minimum rank. The wff 𝜑 can be thought of as 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦). Scheme "Collection Principle" of [Jech] p. 72. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
cp | ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | vex 3479 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V | |
2 | 1 | cplem2 9882 | . 2 ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) |
3 | abn0 4380 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑) | |
4 | elin 3964 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)) | |
5 | abid 2714 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
6 | 5 | anbi1i 625 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)) |
7 | ancom 462 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3bitri 297 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) |
9 | 8 | exbii 1851 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) |
10 | nfab1 2906 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} | |
11 | nfcv 2904 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤 | |
12 | 10, 11 | nfin 4216 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) |
13 | 12 | n0f 4342 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤)) |
14 | df-rex 3072 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
15 | 9, 13, 14 | 3bitr4i 303 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
16 | 3, 15 | imbi12i 351 | . . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
17 | 16 | ralbii 3094 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
18 | 17 | exbii 1851 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
19 | 2, 18 | mpbi 229 | 1 ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 397 ∃wex 1782 ∈ wcel 2107 {cab 2710 ≠ wne 2941 ∀wral 3062 ∃wrex 3071 ∩ cin 3947 ∅c0 4322 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2109 ax-9 2117 ax-10 2138 ax-11 2155 ax-12 2172 ax-ext 2704 ax-rep 5285 ax-sep 5299 ax-nul 5306 ax-pow 5363 ax-pr 5427 ax-un 7722 ax-reg 9584 ax-inf2 9633 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-or 847 df-3or 1089 df-3an 1090 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2535 df-eu 2564 df-clab 2711 df-cleq 2725 df-clel 2811 df-nfc 2886 df-ne 2942 df-ral 3063 df-rex 3072 df-reu 3378 df-rab 3434 df-v 3477 df-sbc 3778 df-csb 3894 df-dif 3951 df-un 3953 df-in 3955 df-ss 3965 df-pss 3967 df-nul 4323 df-if 4529 df-pw 4604 df-sn 4629 df-pr 4631 df-op 4635 df-uni 4909 df-int 4951 df-iun 4999 df-iin 5000 df-br 5149 df-opab 5211 df-mpt 5232 df-tr 5266 df-id 5574 df-eprel 5580 df-po 5588 df-so 5589 df-fr 5631 df-we 5633 df-xp 5682 df-rel 5683 df-cnv 5684 df-co 5685 df-dm 5686 df-rn 5687 df-res 5688 df-ima 5689 df-pred 6298 df-ord 6365 df-on 6366 df-lim 6367 df-suc 6368 df-iota 6493 df-fun 6543 df-fn 6544 df-f 6545 df-f1 6546 df-fo 6547 df-f1o 6548 df-fv 6549 df-ov 7409 df-om 7853 df-2nd 7973 df-frecs 8263 df-wrecs 8294 df-recs 8368 df-rdg 8407 df-r1 9756 df-rank 9757 |
This theorem is referenced by: bnd 9884 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |