![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > cp | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Collection Principle. This remarkable theorem scheme is in effect a very strong generalization of the Axiom of Replacement. The proof makes use of Scott's trick scottex 9928 that collapses a proper class into a set of minimum rank. The wff 𝜑 can be thought of as 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦). Scheme "Collection Principle" of [Jech] p. 72. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
cp | ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | vex 3466 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V | |
2 | 1 | cplem2 9933 | . 2 ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) |
3 | abn0 4385 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑) | |
4 | elin 3963 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)) | |
5 | abid 2707 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
6 | 5 | anbi1i 622 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)) |
7 | ancom 459 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3bitri 296 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) |
9 | 8 | exbii 1843 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) |
10 | nfab1 2894 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} | |
11 | nfcv 2892 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤 | |
12 | 10, 11 | nfin 4217 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) |
13 | 12 | n0f 4345 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤)) |
14 | df-rex 3061 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
15 | 9, 13, 14 | 3bitr4i 302 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
16 | 3, 15 | imbi12i 349 | . . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
17 | 16 | ralbii 3083 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
18 | 17 | exbii 1843 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
19 | 2, 18 | mpbi 229 | 1 ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 394 ∃wex 1774 ∈ wcel 2099 {cab 2703 ≠ wne 2930 ∀wral 3051 ∃wrex 3060 ∩ cin 3946 ∅c0 4325 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1790 ax-4 1804 ax-5 1906 ax-6 1964 ax-7 2004 ax-8 2101 ax-9 2109 ax-10 2130 ax-11 2147 ax-12 2167 ax-ext 2697 ax-rep 5290 ax-sep 5304 ax-nul 5311 ax-pow 5369 ax-pr 5433 ax-un 7746 ax-reg 9635 ax-inf2 9684 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 395 df-or 846 df-3or 1085 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1537 df-fal 1547 df-ex 1775 df-nf 1779 df-sb 2061 df-mo 2529 df-eu 2558 df-clab 2704 df-cleq 2718 df-clel 2803 df-nfc 2878 df-ne 2931 df-ral 3052 df-rex 3061 df-reu 3365 df-rab 3420 df-v 3464 df-sbc 3777 df-csb 3893 df-dif 3950 df-un 3952 df-in 3954 df-ss 3964 df-pss 3967 df-nul 4326 df-if 4534 df-pw 4609 df-sn 4634 df-pr 4636 df-op 4640 df-uni 4914 df-int 4955 df-iun 5003 df-iin 5004 df-br 5154 df-opab 5216 df-mpt 5237 df-tr 5271 df-id 5580 df-eprel 5586 df-po 5594 df-so 5595 df-fr 5637 df-we 5639 df-xp 5688 df-rel 5689 df-cnv 5690 df-co 5691 df-dm 5692 df-rn 5693 df-res 5694 df-ima 5695 df-pred 6312 df-ord 6379 df-on 6380 df-lim 6381 df-suc 6382 df-iota 6506 df-fun 6556 df-fn 6557 df-f 6558 df-f1 6559 df-fo 6560 df-f1o 6561 df-fv 6562 df-ov 7427 df-om 7877 df-2nd 8004 df-frecs 8296 df-wrecs 8327 df-recs 8401 df-rdg 8440 df-r1 9807 df-rank 9808 |
This theorem is referenced by: bnd 9935 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |