| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > cp | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Collection Principle. This remarkable theorem scheme is in effect a very strong generalization of the Axiom of Replacement. The proof makes use of Scott's trick df-scott 9939 to collapse a proper class into a set of minimum rank. The wff 𝜑 can be thought of as 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦). Scheme "Collection Principle" of [Jech] p. 72. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2003.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| cp | ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vex 3457 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V | |
| 2 | 1 | cplem2 9962 | . 2 ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) |
| 3 | abn0 4336 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑) | |
| 4 | elin 4095 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)) | |
| 5 | abid 2745 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
| 6 | 5 | anbi1i 636 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)) |
| 7 | ancom 466 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3bitri 300 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 9 | 8 | exbii 1880 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 10 | nfab1 2927 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 11 | nfcv 2925 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤 | |
| 12 | 10, 11 | nfin 4123 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) |
| 13 | 12 | n0f 4298 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤)) |
| 14 | df-rex 3090 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 15 | 9, 13, 14 | 3bitr4i 306 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
| 16 | 3, 15 | imbi12i 353 | . . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
| 17 | 16 | ralbii 3111 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
| 18 | 17 | exbii 1880 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ → ({𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝑤) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)) |
| 19 | 2, 18 | mpbi 233 | 1 ⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 401 ∃wex 1811 ∈ wcel 2146 {cab 2741 ≠ wne 2958 ∀wral 3079 ∃wrex 3089 ∩ cin 4091 ∅c0 4280 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1827 ax-4 1841 ax-5 1944 ax-6 2001 ax-7 2042 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-10 2179 ax-11 2196 ax-12 2215 ax-ext 2735 ax-rep 5234 ax-sep 5251 ax-nul 5262 ax-pow 5330 ax-pr 5394 ax-un 7758 ax-reg 9596 ax-inf2 9652 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1572 df-fal 1582 df-ex 1812 df-nf 1816 df-sb 2101 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2838 df-nfc 2912 df-ne 2959 df-ral 3080 df-rex 3090 df-reu 3369 df-rab 3416 df-v 3455 df-sbc 3742 df-csb 3851 df-ss 3900 df-pss 4016 df-dif 4049 df-in 4093 df-un 4153 df-nul 4281 df-if 4485 df-pw 4561 df-sn 4588 df-pr 4590 df-op 4838 df-uni 4870 df-int 4910 df-iun 4955 df-iin 4956 df-br 5106 df-opab 5170 df-mpt 5189 df-tr 5215 df-id 5549 df-eprel 5554 df-po 5562 df-so 5563 df-fr 5607 df-we 5609 df-xp 5660 df-rel 5661 df-cnv 5662 df-co 5663 df-dm 5664 df-rn 5665 df-res 5666 df-ima 5667 df-pred 6310 df-ord 6371 df-on 6372 df-lim 6373 df-suc 6374 df-iota 6500 df-fun 6548 df-fn 6549 df-f 6550 df-f1 6551 df-fo 6552 df-f1o 6553 df-fv 6554 df-ov 7430 df-om 7885 df-2nd 8009 df-frecs 8310 df-wrecs 8341 df-recs 8390 df-rdg 8429 df-r1 9778 df-rank 9779 df-scott 9939 |
| This theorem is used by: bnd 9965 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |