Theorem bj-inexeqex 35321

Description: Lemma for bj-opelid 35323 (but not specific to the identity relation): if the intersection of two classes is a set and the two classes are equal, then both are sets (all three classes are equal, so they all belong to 𝑉, but it is more convenient to have V in the consequent for theorems using it). (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-inexeqex	⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))

Proof of Theorem bj-inexeqex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqimss 3982	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
2		df-ss 3909	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
3	1, 2	sylib 217	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
4		eleq1 2828	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉))
5	4	biimpac 479	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
6	3, 5	sylan2 593	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
7	6	elexd 3451	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
8		eqimss2 3983	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
9		sseqin2 4155	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
10	8, 9	sylib 217	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
11		eleq1 2828	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉))
12	11	biimpac 479	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)
13	10, 12	sylan2 593	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)
14	13	elexd 3451	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
15	7, 14	jca 512	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2110  Vcvv 3431   ∩ cin 3891   ⊆ wss 3892

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2072  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2818  df-rab 3075  df-v 3433  df-in 3899  df-ss 3909

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-elsn0  35322  bj-opelid  35323  bj-ideqgALT  35325