Theorem bj-ideqgALT 37598

Description: Alternate proof of bj-ideqg 37597 from brabga 5498 instead of bj-opelid 37596 itself proved from bj-opelidb 37592. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-ideqgALT	⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem bj-ideqgALT

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		reli 5792	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel I
2	1	brrelex12i 5695	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 I 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
3	2	adantl 484	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 I 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
4		bj-inexeqex 37594	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
5		eqeq12 2773	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
6		df-id 5535	. . 3 ⊢ I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦}
7	5, 6	brabga 5498	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
8	3, 4, 7	pm5.21nd 809	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1554   ∈ wcel 2136  Vcvv 3448   ∩ cin 3898   class class class wbr 5094   I cid 5534

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1809  ax-4 1823  ax-5 1924  ax-6 1981  ax-7 2022  ax-8 2138  ax-9 2146  ax-ext 2728  ax-sep 5240  ax-pr 5384

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 857  df-3an 1097  df-tru 1557  df-fal 1567  df-ex 1794  df-sb 2085  df-clab 2735  df-cleq 2748  df-clel 2831  df-ral 3071  df-rex 3081  df-rab 3409  df-v 3450  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4281  df-if 4475  df-sn 4577  df-pr 4579  df-op 4583  df-br 5095  df-opab 5157  df-id 5535  df-xp 5646  df-rel 5647

This theorem is referenced by: (None)