Theorem bj-ideqgALT 35338

Description: Alternate proof of bj-ideqg 35337 from brabga 5450 instead of bj-opelid 35336 itself proved from bj-opelidb 35332. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-ideqgALT	⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem bj-ideqgALT

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		reli 5735	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel I
2	1	brrelex12i 5643	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 I 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
3	2	adantl 482	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 I 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
4		bj-inexeqex 35334	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
5		eqeq12 2757	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
6		df-id 5490	. . 3 ⊢ I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦}
7	5, 6	brabga 5450	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
8	3, 4, 7	pm5.21nd 799	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2110  Vcvv 3431   ∩ cin 3891   class class class wbr 5079   I cid 5489

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5227  ax-nul 5234  ax-pr 5356

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2072  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2818  df-ral 3071  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3075  df-v 3433  df-dif 3895  df-un 3897  df-in 3899  df-ss 3909  df-nul 4263  df-if 4466  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-br 5080  df-opab 5142  df-id 5490  df-xp 5596  df-rel 5597

This theorem is referenced by: (None)