Theorem bj-ideqgALT 37209

Description: Alternate proof of bj-ideqg 37208 from brabga 5477 instead of bj-opelid 37207 itself proved from bj-opelidb 37203. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-ideqgALT	⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem bj-ideqgALT

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		reli 5771	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel I
2	1	brrelex12i 5674	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 I 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
3	2	adantl 481	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 I 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
4		bj-inexeqex 37205	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
5		eqeq12 2748	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
6		df-id 5514	. . 3 ⊢ I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦}
7	5, 6	brabga 5477	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
8	3, 4, 7	pm5.21nd 801	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  Vcvv 3436   ∩ cin 3896   class class class wbr 5093   I cid 5513

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5236  ax-nul 5246  ax-pr 5372

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4283  df-if 4475  df-sn 4576  df-pr 4578  df-op 4582  df-br 5094  df-opab 5156  df-id 5514  df-xp 5625  df-rel 5626

This theorem is referenced by: (None)