P. 364 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 36301-36400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mclsind 36301*	Induction theorem for closure: any other set 𝑄 closed under the axioms and the hypotheses contains all the elements of the closure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (mAx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (mSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (mVars‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑄)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐻‘𝑣) ∈ 𝑄)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (⟨𝑚, 𝑜, 𝑝⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ (𝑠 “ (𝑜 ∪ ran 𝐻)) ⊆ 𝑄) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑚𝑦 → ((𝑊‘(𝑠‘(𝐻‘𝑥))) × (𝑊‘(𝑠‘(𝐻‘𝑦)))) ⊆ 𝐾)) → (𝑠‘𝑝) ∈ 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾𝐶𝐵) ⊆ 𝑄)
Theorem	mppspstlem 36302*	Lemma for mppspst 36305. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑑, ℎ⟩, 𝑎⟩ ∣ (⟨𝑑, ℎ, 𝑎⟩ ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑑𝐶ℎ))} ⊆ 𝑃
Theorem	mppsval 36303*	Definition of a provable pre-statement, essentially just a reorganization of the arguments of df-mcls . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐽 = {⟨⟨𝑑, ℎ⟩, 𝑎⟩ ∣ (⟨𝑑, ℎ, 𝑎⟩ ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑑𝐶ℎ))}
Theorem	elmpps 36304	Definition of a provable pre-statement, essentially just a reorganization of the arguments of df-mcls . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝐽 ↔ (⟨𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐷𝐶𝐻)))
Theorem	mppspst 36305	A provable pre-statement is a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐽 ⊆ 𝑃
Theorem	mthmval 36306	A theorem is a pre-statement, whose reduct is also the reduct of a provable pre-statement. Unlike the difference between pre-statement and statement, this application of the reduct is not necessarily trivial: there are theorems that are not themselves provable but are provable once enough "dummy variables" are introduced. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑈 = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽))
Theorem	elmthm 36307*	A theorem is a pre-statement, whose reduct is also the reduct of a provable pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑅‘𝑥) = (𝑅‘𝑋))
Theorem	mthmi 36308	A statement whose reduct is the reduct of a provable pre-statement is a theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ (𝑅‘𝑋) = (𝑅‘𝑌)) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mthmsta 36309	A theorem is a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆
Theorem	mppsthm 36310	A provable pre-statement is a theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐽 ⊆ 𝑈
Theorem	mthmblem 36311	Lemma for mthmb 36312. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅‘𝑋) = (𝑅‘𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈))
Theorem	mthmb 36312	If two statements have the same reduct then one is a theorem iff the other is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅‘𝑋) = (𝑅‘𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈))
Theorem	mthmpps 36313	Given a theorem, there is an explicitly definable witnessing provable pre-statement for the provability of the theorem. (However, this pre-statement requires infinitely many disjoint variable conditions, which is sometimes inconvenient.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVars‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ∪ (𝑉 “ (𝐻 ∪ {𝐴}))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐶 ∪ (𝐷 ∖ (𝑍 × 𝑍)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ mFS → (⟨𝐶, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝑈 ↔ (⟨𝑀, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝐽 ∧ (𝑅‘⟨𝑀, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩) = (𝑅‘⟨𝐶, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩))))
Theorem	mclsppslem 36314*	The closure is closed under application of provable pre-statements. (Compare mclsax 36300.) This theorem is what justifies the treatment of theorems as "equivalent" to axioms once they have been proven: the composition of one theorem in the proof of another yields a theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (mSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (mVars‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑀, 𝑂, 𝑃⟩ ∈ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑂) → (𝑆‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑣)) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥𝑀𝑦 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑊‘(𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑥))) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑊‘(𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑦))))) → 𝑎𝐾𝑏)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑚, 𝑜, 𝑝⟩ ∈ (mAx‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑠 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑠 “ (𝑜 ∪ ran 𝐻)) ⊆ (◡𝑆 “ (𝐾𝐶𝐵)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝑧𝑚𝑤 → ((𝑊‘(𝑠‘(𝐻‘𝑧))) × (𝑊‘(𝑠‘(𝐻‘𝑤)))) ⊆ 𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑠‘𝑝) ∈ (◡𝑆 “ (𝐾𝐶𝐵)))
Theorem	mclspps 36315*	The closure is closed under application of provable pre-statements. (Compare mclsax 36300.) This theorem is what justifies the treatment of theorems as "equivalent" to axioms once they have been proven: the composition of one theorem in the proof of another yields a theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (mSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (mVars‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑀, 𝑂, 𝑃⟩ ∈ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑂) → (𝑆‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑣)) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥𝑀𝑦 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑊‘(𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑥))) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑊‘(𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑦))))) → 𝑎𝐾𝑏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝑃) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))
21.6.14  Grammatical formal systems
Syntax	cm0s 36316	Mapping expressions to statements.
class m0St
Syntax	cmsa 36317	The set of syntax axioms.
class mSA
Syntax	cmwgfs 36318	The set of weakly grammatical formal systems.
class mWGFS
Syntax	cmsy 36319	The syntax typecode function.
class mSyn
Syntax	cmesy 36320	The syntax typecode function for expressions.
class mESyn
Syntax	cmgfs 36321	The set of grammatical formal systems.
class mGFS
Syntax	cmtree 36322	The set of proof trees.
class mTree
Syntax	cmst 36323	The set of syntax trees.
class mST
Syntax	cmsax 36324	The indexing set for a syntax axiom.
class mSAX
Syntax	cmufs 36325	The set of unambiguous formal systems.
class mUFS
Definition	df-m0s 36326	Define a function mapping expressions to statements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ m0St = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ ⟨∅, ∅, 𝑎⟩)
Definition	df-msa 36327*	Define the set of syntax axioms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mSA = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ {𝑎 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡) ∣ ((m0St‘𝑎) ∈ (mAx‘𝑡) ∧ (1st ‘𝑎) ∈ (mVT‘𝑡) ∧ Fun (◡(2nd ‘𝑎) ↾ (mVR‘𝑡)))})
Definition	df-mwgfs 36328*	Define the set of weakly grammatical formal systems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mWGFS = {𝑡 ∈ mFS ∣ ∀𝑑∀ℎ∀𝑎((⟨𝑑, ℎ, 𝑎⟩ ∈ (mAx‘𝑡) ∧ (1st ‘𝑎) ∈ (mVT‘𝑡)) → ∃𝑠 ∈ ran (mSubst‘𝑡)𝑎 ∈ (𝑠 “ (mSA‘𝑡)))}
Definition	df-msyn 36329	Define the syntax typecode function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mSyn = Slot 6
Definition	df-mesyn 36330*	Define the syntax typecode function for expressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2023.)
⊢ mESyn = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑐 ∈ (mTC‘𝑡), 𝑒 ∈ (mREx‘𝑡) ↦ (((mSyn‘𝑡)‘𝑐)m0St𝑒)))
Definition	df-mgfs 36331*	Define the set of grammatical formal systems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2023.)
⊢ mGFS = {𝑡 ∈ mWGFS ∣ ((mSyn‘𝑡):(mTC‘𝑡)⟶(mVT‘𝑡) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ (mVT‘𝑡)((mSyn‘𝑡)‘𝑐) = 𝑐 ∧ ∀𝑑∀ℎ∀𝑎(⟨𝑑, ℎ, 𝑎⟩ ∈ (mAx‘𝑡) → ∀𝑒 ∈ (ℎ ∪ {𝑎})((mESyn‘𝑡)‘𝑒) ∈ (mPPSt‘𝑡)))}
Definition	df-mtree 36332*	Define the set of proof trees. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mTree = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 (mDV‘𝑡), ℎ ∈ 𝒫 (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (∀𝑒 ∈ ran (mVH‘𝑡)𝑒𝑟⟨(m0St‘𝑒), ∅⟩ ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ ℎ 𝑒𝑟⟨((mStRed‘𝑡)‘⟨𝑑, ℎ, 𝑒⟩), ∅⟩ ∧ ∀𝑚∀𝑜∀𝑝(⟨𝑚, 𝑜, 𝑝⟩ ∈ (mAx‘𝑡) → ∀𝑠 ∈ ran (mSubst‘𝑡)(∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑚𝑦 → (((mVars‘𝑡)‘(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑥))) × ((mVars‘𝑡)‘(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑦)))) ⊆ 𝑑) → ({(𝑠‘𝑝)} × X𝑒 ∈ (𝑜 ∪ ((mVH‘𝑡) “ ∪ ((mVars‘𝑡) “ (𝑜 ∪ {𝑝}))))(𝑟 “ {(𝑠‘𝑒)})) ⊆ 𝑟)))}))
Definition	df-mst 36333	Define the function mapping syntax expressions to syntax trees. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mST = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ ((∅(mTree‘𝑡)∅) ↾ ((mEx‘𝑡) ↾ (mVT‘𝑡))))
Definition	df-msax 36334*	Define the indexing set for a syntax axiom's representation in a tree. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mSAX = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑝 ∈ (mSA‘𝑡) ↦ ((mVH‘𝑡) “ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑝))))
Definition	df-mufs 36335	Define the set of unambiguous formal systems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mUFS = {𝑡 ∈ mGFS ∣ Fun (mST‘𝑡)}
21.6.15  Models of formal systems
Syntax	cmuv 36336	The universe of a model.
class mUV
Syntax	cmvl 36337	The set of valuations.
class mVL
Syntax	cmvsb 36338	Substitution for a valuation.
class mVSubst
Syntax	cmfsh 36339	The freshness relation of a model.
class mFresh
Syntax	cmfr 36340	The set of freshness relations.
class mFRel
Syntax	cmevl 36341	The evaluation function of a model.
class mEval
Syntax	cmdl 36342	The set of models.
class mMdl
Syntax	cusyn 36343	The syntax function applied to elements of the model.
class mUSyn
Syntax	cgmdl 36344	The set of models in a grammatical formal system.
class mGMdl
Syntax	cmitp 36345	The interpretation function of the model.
class mItp
Syntax	cmfitp 36346	The evaluation function derived from the interpretation.
class mFromItp
Definition	df-muv 36347	Define the universe of a model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mUV = Slot 7
Definition	df-mfsh 36348	Define the freshness relation of a model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mFresh = Slot ;19
Definition	df-mevl 36349	Define the evaluation function of a model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mEval = Slot ;20
Definition	df-mvl 36350*	Define the set of valuations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mVL = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ X𝑣 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡)((mUV‘𝑡) “ {((mType‘𝑡)‘𝑣)}))
Definition	df-mvsb 36351*	Define substitution applied to a valuation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mVSubst = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ {⟨⟨𝑠, 𝑚⟩, 𝑥⟩ ∣ ((𝑠 ∈ ran (mSubst‘𝑡) ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (mVL‘𝑡)) ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡)𝑚dom (mEval‘𝑡)(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑣 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡) ↦ (𝑚(mEval‘𝑡)(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑣)))))})
Definition	df-mfrel 36352*	Define the set of freshness relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mFRel = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 ((mUV‘𝑡) × (mUV‘𝑡)) ∣ (◡𝑟 = 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ (mVT‘𝑡)∀𝑤 ∈ (𝒫 (mUV‘𝑡) ∩ Fin)∃𝑣 ∈ ((mUV‘𝑡) “ {𝑐})𝑤 ⊆ (𝑟 “ {𝑣}))})
Definition	df-mdl 36353*	Define the set of models of a formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mMdl = {𝑡 ∈ mFS ∣ [(mUV‘𝑡) / 𝑢][(mEx‘𝑡) / 𝑥][(mVL‘𝑡) / 𝑣][(mEval‘𝑡) / 𝑛][(mFresh‘𝑡) / 𝑓]((𝑢 ⊆ ((mTC‘𝑡) × V) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (mFRel‘𝑡) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝑢 ↑pm (𝑣 × (mEx‘𝑡)))) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑣 ((∀𝑒 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩}) ⊆ (𝑢 “ {(1st ‘𝑒)}) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡)⟨𝑚, ((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑦)⟩𝑛(𝑚‘𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑑∀ℎ∀𝑎(⟨𝑑, ℎ, 𝑎⟩ ∈ (mAx‘𝑡) → ((∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝑦𝑑𝑧 → (𝑚‘𝑦)𝑓(𝑚‘𝑧)) ∧ ℎ ⊆ (dom 𝑛 “ {𝑚})) → 𝑚dom 𝑛 𝑎))) ∧ (∀𝑠 ∈ ran (mSubst‘𝑡)∀𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡)∀𝑦(⟨𝑠, 𝑚⟩(mVSubst‘𝑡)𝑦 → (𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, (𝑠‘𝑒)⟩}) = (𝑛 “ {⟨𝑦, 𝑒⟩})) ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝑥 ((𝑚 ↾ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑒)) = (𝑝 ↾ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑒)) → (𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩}) = (𝑛 “ {⟨𝑝, 𝑒⟩})) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝑥 ((𝑚 “ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑒)) ⊆ (𝑓 “ {𝑦}) → (𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩}) ⊆ (𝑓 “ {𝑦})))))}
Definition	df-musyn 36354*	Define the syntax typecode function for the model universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mUSyn = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ (mUV‘𝑡) ↦ ⟨((mSyn‘𝑡)‘(1st ‘𝑣)), (2nd ‘𝑣)⟩))
Definition	df-gmdl 36355*	Define the set of models of a grammatical formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mGMdl = {𝑡 ∈ (mGFS ∩ mMdl) ∣ (∀𝑐 ∈ (mTC‘𝑡)((mUV‘𝑡) “ {𝑐}) ⊆ ((mUV‘𝑡) “ {((mSyn‘𝑡)‘𝑐)}) ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ (mUV‘𝑐)∀𝑤 ∈ (mUV‘𝑐)(𝑣(mFresh‘𝑡)𝑤 ↔ 𝑣(mFresh‘𝑡)((mUSyn‘𝑡)‘𝑤)) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ (mVL‘𝑡)∀𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡)((mEval‘𝑡) “ {⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩}) = (((mEval‘𝑡) “ {⟨𝑚, ((mESyn‘𝑡)‘𝑒)⟩}) ∩ ((mUV‘𝑡) “ {(1st ‘𝑒)})))}
Definition	df-mitp 36356*	Define the interpretation function for a model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mItp = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (mSA‘𝑡) ↦ (𝑔 ∈ X𝑖 ∈ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑎)((mUV‘𝑡) “ {((mType‘𝑡)‘𝑖)}) ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑚 ∈ (mVL‘𝑡)(𝑔 = (𝑚 ↾ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑎)) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑚(mEval‘𝑡)𝑎))))))
Definition	df-mfitp 36357*	Define a function that produces the evaluation function, given the interpretation function for a model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mFromItp = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ X𝑎 ∈ (mSA‘𝑡)(((mUV‘𝑡) “ {((1st ‘𝑡)‘𝑎)}) ↑m X𝑖 ∈ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑎)((mUV‘𝑡) “ {((mType‘𝑡)‘𝑖)})) ↦ (℩𝑛 ∈ ((mUV‘𝑡) ↑pm ((mVL‘𝑡) × (mEx‘𝑡)))∀𝑚 ∈ (mVL‘𝑡)(∀𝑣 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡)⟨𝑚, ((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑣)⟩𝑛(𝑚‘𝑣) ∧ ∀𝑒∀𝑎∀𝑔(𝑒(mST‘𝑡)⟨𝑎, 𝑔⟩ → ⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩𝑛(𝑓‘(𝑖 ∈ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑎) ↦ (𝑚𝑛(𝑔‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑖)))))) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡)(𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩}) = ((𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, ((mESyn‘𝑡)‘𝑒)⟩}) ∩ ((mUV‘𝑡) “ {(1st ‘𝑒)}))))))
21.6.16  Splitting fields
Syntax	ccpms 36358	Completion of a metric space.
class cplMetSp
Syntax	chlb 36359	Embeddings for a direct limit.
class HomLimB
Syntax	chlim 36360	Direct limit structure.
class HomLim
Syntax	cpfl 36361	Polynomial extension field.
class polyFld
Syntax	csf1 36362	Splitting field for a single polynomial (auxiliary).
class splitFld1
Syntax	csf 36363	Splitting field for a finite set of polynomials.
class splitFld
Syntax	cpsl 36364	Splitting field for a sequence of polynomials.
class polySplitLim
Definition	df-cplmet 36365*	A function which completes the given metric space. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ cplMetSp = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ ⦋((𝑤 ↑s ℕ) ↾s (Cau‘(dist‘𝑤))) / 𝑟⦌⦋(Base‘𝑟) / 𝑣⦌⦋{⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ({𝑓, 𝑔} ⊆ 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ (𝑓 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)):(ℤ≥‘𝑗)⟶((𝑔‘𝑗)(ball‘(dist‘𝑤))𝑥))} / 𝑒⦌((𝑟 /s 𝑒) sSet {⟨(dist‘ndx), {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑣 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑣 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑒 ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑒) ∧ (𝑝 ∘f (dist‘𝑟)𝑞) ⇝ 𝑧)}⟩}))
Definition	df-homlimb 36366*	The input to this function is a sequence (on ℕ) of homomorphisms 𝐹(𝑛):𝑅(𝑛)⟶𝑅(𝑛 + 1). The resulting structure is the direct limit of the direct system so defined. This function returns the pair ⟨𝑆, 𝐺⟩ where 𝑆 is the terminal object and 𝐺 is a sequence of functions such that 𝐺(𝑛):𝑅(𝑛)⟶𝑆 and 𝐺(𝑛) = 𝐹(𝑛) ∘ 𝐺(𝑛 + 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ HomLimB = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ⦋∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ({𝑛} × dom (𝑓‘𝑛)) / 𝑣⦌⦋∩ {𝑠 ∣ (𝑠 Er 𝑣 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ ⟨((1st ‘𝑥) + 1), ((𝑓‘(1st ‘𝑥))‘(2nd ‘𝑥))⟩) ⊆ 𝑠)} / 𝑒⦌⟨(𝑣 / 𝑒), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ dom (𝑓‘𝑛) ↦ [⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩]𝑒))⟩)
Definition	df-homlim 36367*	The input to this function is a sequence (on ℕ) of structures 𝑅(𝑛) and homomorphisms 𝐹(𝑛):𝑅(𝑛)⟶𝑅(𝑛 + 1). The resulting structure is the direct limit of the direct system so defined, and maintains any structures that were present in the original objects. TODO: generalize to directed sets? (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ HomLim = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ⦋( HomLimB ‘𝑓) / 𝑒⦌⦋(1st ‘𝑒) / 𝑣⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑒) / 𝑔⦌({⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑣⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ran (𝑥 ∈ dom (𝑔‘𝑛), 𝑦 ∈ dom (𝑔‘𝑛) ↦ ⟨⟨((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑥), ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑦)⟩, ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘(𝑥(+g‘(𝑟‘𝑛))𝑦))⟩)⟩, ⟨(.r‘ndx), ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ran (𝑥 ∈ dom (𝑔‘𝑛), 𝑦 ∈ dom (𝑔‘𝑛) ↦ ⟨⟨((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑥), ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑦)⟩, ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘(𝑥(.r‘(𝑟‘𝑛))𝑦))⟩)⟩} ∪ {⟨(TopOpen‘ndx), {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (◡(𝑔‘𝑛) “ 𝑠) ∈ (TopOpen‘(𝑟‘𝑛))}⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ran (𝑥 ∈ dom ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑛), 𝑦 ∈ dom ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑛) ↦ ⟨⟨((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑥), ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑦)⟩, (𝑥(dist‘(𝑟‘𝑛))𝑦)⟩)⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ (◡(𝑔‘𝑛) ∘ ((le‘(𝑟‘𝑛)) ∘ (𝑔‘𝑛)))⟩}))
Definition	df-plfl 36368*	Define the field extension that augments a field with the root of the given irreducible polynomial, and extends the norm if one exists and the extension is unique. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux and Steven Nguyen, 21-Jun-2025.)
⊢ polyFld = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(Poly1‘𝑟) / 𝑠⦌⦋((RSpan‘𝑠)‘{𝑝}) / 𝑖⦌⦋(𝑐 ∈ (Base‘𝑟) ↦ [(𝑐( ·𝑠 ‘𝑠)(1r‘𝑠))](𝑠 ~QG 𝑖)) / 𝑓⦌⟨⦋(𝑠 /s (𝑠 ~QG 𝑖)) / 𝑡⦌((𝑡 toNrmGrp (℩𝑛 ∈ (AbsVal‘𝑡)(𝑛 ∘ 𝑓) = (norm‘𝑟))) sSet ⟨(le‘ndx), ⦋(𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑡) ↦ (℩𝑞 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑞(rem1p‘𝑟)𝑝) = 𝑞)) / 𝑔⦌(◡𝑔 ∘ ((le‘𝑠) ∘ 𝑔))⟩), 𝑓⟩)
Theorem	rexxfr3d 36369*	Transfer existential quantification from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. (Contributed by SN, 20-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = 𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexxfr3dALT 36370*	Longer proof of rexxfr3d 36369 using ax-11 2194 instead of ax-12 2213, without the disjoint variable condition 𝐴𝑥𝑦. (Contributed by SN, 19-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = 𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rspssbasd 36371	The span of a set of ring elements is a set of ring elements. (Contributed by SN, 19-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (RSpan‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	ellcsrspsn 36372*	Membership in a left coset in a quotient of a ring by the span of a singleton (that is, by the ideal generated by an element). This characterization comes from eqglact 19368 and elrspsn 21502. (Contributed by SN, 19-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~QG 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 /s ∼ )    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = ((RSpan‘𝑅)‘{𝑀})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝑈))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑋 = [𝑥] ∼ ∧ 𝑋 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑥 + (𝑦 · 𝑀))}))
Theorem	ply1divalg3 36373*	Uniqueness of polynomial remainder: convert the subtraction in ply1divalg2 26434 to addition. (Contributed by SN, 20-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (.r‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Unic1p‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐷‘(𝐹 + (𝑞 ∙ 𝐺))) < (𝐷‘𝐺))
Theorem	r1peuqusdeg1 36374*	Uniqueness of polynomial remainder in terms of a quotient structure in the sense of the right hand side of r1pid2 26457. (Contributed by SN, 21-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = ((RSpan‘𝑃)‘{𝐹})    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝐼))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Unic1p‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Domn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑞 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐷‘𝑞) < (𝐷‘𝐹))
Definition	df-sfl1 36375*	Temporary construction for the splitting field of a polynomial. The inputs are a field 𝑟 and a polynomial 𝑝 that we want to split, along with a tuple 𝑗 in the same format as the output. The output is a tuple ⟨𝑆, 𝐹⟩ where 𝑆 is the splitting field and 𝐹 is an injective homomorphism from the original field 𝑟. The function works by repeatedly finding the smallest monic irreducible factor, and extending the field by that factor using the polyFld construction. We keep track of a total order in each of the splitting fields so that we can pick an element definably without needing global choice. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ splitFld1 = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝑝 ∈ (Poly1‘𝑟) ↦ (rec((𝑠 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(Poly1‘𝑠) / 𝑚⦌⦋{𝑔 ∈ ((Monic1p‘𝑠) ∩ (Irred‘𝑚)) ∣ (𝑔(∥r‘𝑚)(𝑝 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ 1 < (𝑠deg1𝑔))} / 𝑏⦌if(((𝑝 ∘ 𝑓) = (0g‘𝑚) ∨ 𝑏 = ∅), ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩, ⦋(glb‘𝑏) / ℎ⦌⦋(𝑠 polyFld ℎ) / 𝑡⦌⟨(1st ‘𝑡), (𝑓 ∘ (2nd ‘𝑡))⟩)), 𝑗)‘(card‘(1...(𝑟deg1𝑝))))))
Definition	df-sfl 36376*	Define the splitting field of a finite collection of polynomials, given a total ordered base field. The output is a tuple ⟨𝑆, 𝐹⟩ where 𝑆 is the totally ordered splitting field and 𝐹 is an injective homomorphism from the original field 𝑟. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ splitFld = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑝 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑓(𝑓 Isom < , (lt‘𝑟)((1...(♯‘𝑝)), 𝑝) ∧ 𝑥 = (seq0((𝑒 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑟 splitFld1 𝑒)‘𝑔)), (𝑓 ∪ {⟨0, ⟨𝑟, ( I ↾ (Base‘𝑟))⟩⟩}))‘(♯‘𝑝)))))
Definition	df-psl 36377*	Define the direct limit of an increasing sequence of fields produced by pasting together the splitting fields for each sequence of polynomials. That is, given a ring 𝑟, a strict order on 𝑟, and a sequence 𝑝:ℕ⟶(𝒫 𝑟 ∩ Fin) of finite sets of polynomials to split, we construct the direct limit system of field extensions by splitting one set at a time and passing the resulting construction to HomLim. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ polySplitLim = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑝 ∈ ((𝒫 (Base‘𝑟) ∩ Fin) ↑m ℕ) ↦ ⦋(1st ∘ seq0((𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑞 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑔) / 𝑒⦌⦋(1st ‘𝑒) / 𝑠⦌⦋(𝑠 splitFld ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑞 ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (2nd ‘𝑔)))) / 𝑓⦌⟨𝑓, ((2nd ‘𝑔) ∘ (2nd ‘𝑓))⟩), (𝑝 ∪ {⟨0, ⟨⟨𝑟, ∅⟩, ( I ↾ (Base‘𝑟))⟩⟩}))) / 𝑓⦌((1st ∘ (𝑓 shift 1)) HomLim (2nd ∘ 𝑓)))
21.6.17  p-adic number fields
Syntax	czr 36378	Integral elements of a ring.
class ZRing
Syntax	cgf 36379	Galois finite field.
class GF
Syntax	cgfo 36380	Galois limit field.
class GF∞
Syntax	ceqp 36381	Equivalence relation for df-qp 36392.
class ~Qp
Syntax	crqp 36382	Equivalence relation representatives for df-qp 36392.
class /Qp
Syntax	cqp 36383	The set of 𝑝-adic rational numbers.
class Qp
Syntax	czp 36384	The set of 𝑝-adic integers. (Not to be confused with czn 21785.)
class Zp
Syntax	cqpa 36385	Algebraic completion of the 𝑝-adic rational numbers.
class _Qp
Syntax	ccp 36386	Metric completion of _Qp.
class Cp
Definition	df-zrng 36387	Define the subring of integral elements in a ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ZRing = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 IntgRing ran (ℤRHom‘𝑟)))
Definition	df-gf 36388*	Define the Galois finite field of order 𝑝↑𝑛. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ GF = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(ℤ/nℤ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌(1st ‘(𝑟 splitFld {⦋(Poly1‘𝑟) / 𝑠⦌⦋(var1‘𝑟) / 𝑥⦌(((𝑝↑𝑛)(.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑠))𝑥)(-g‘𝑠)𝑥)})))
Definition	df-gfoo 36389*	Define the Galois field of order 𝑝↑+∞, as a direct limit of the Galois finite fields. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ GF∞ = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ ⦋(ℤ/nℤ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌(𝑟 polySplitLim (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {⦋(Poly1‘𝑟) / 𝑠⦌⦋(var1‘𝑟) / 𝑥⦌(((𝑝↑𝑛)(.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑠))𝑥)(-g‘𝑠)𝑥)})))
Definition	df-eqp 36390*	Define an equivalence relation on ℤ-indexed sequences of integers such that two sequences are equivalent iff the difference is equivalent to zero, and a sequence is equivalent to zero iff the sum Σ𝑘 ≤ 𝑛𝑓(𝑘)(𝑝↑𝑘) is a multiple of 𝑝↑(𝑛 + 1) for every 𝑛. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ~Qp = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ({𝑓, 𝑔} ⊆ (ℤ ↑m ℤ) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘-𝑛)(((𝑓‘-𝑘) − (𝑔‘-𝑘)) / (𝑝↑(𝑘 + (𝑛 + 1)))) ∈ ℤ)})
Definition	df-rqp 36391*	There is a unique element of (ℤ ↑m (0...(𝑝 − 1))) ~Qp -equivalent to any element of (ℤ ↑m ℤ), if the sequences are zero for sufficiently large negative values; this function selects that element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ /Qp = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (~Qp ∩ ⦋{𝑓 ∈ (ℤ ↑m ℤ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ran ℤ≥(◡𝑓 “ (ℤ ∖ {0})) ⊆ 𝑥} / 𝑦⦌(𝑦 × (𝑦 ∩ (ℤ ↑m (0...(𝑝 − 1)))))))
Definition	df-qp 36392*	Define the 𝑝-adic completion of the rational numbers, as a normed field structure with a total order (that is not compatible with the operations). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Qp = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ ⦋{ℎ ∈ (ℤ ↑m (0...(𝑝 − 1))) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ran ℤ≥(◡ℎ “ (ℤ ∖ {0})) ⊆ 𝑥} / 𝑏⦌(({⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑏⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑔 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ ((/Qp‘𝑝)‘(𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔)))⟩, ⟨(.r‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑔 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ ((/Qp‘𝑝)‘(𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℤ ((𝑓‘𝑘) · (𝑔‘(𝑛 − 𝑘))))))⟩} ∪ {⟨(le‘ndx), {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ({𝑓, 𝑔} ⊆ 𝑏 ∧ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℤ ((𝑓‘-𝑘) · ((𝑝 + 1)↑-𝑘)) < Σ𝑘 ∈ ℤ ((𝑔‘-𝑘) · ((𝑝 + 1)↑-𝑘)))}⟩}) toNrmGrp (𝑓 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ if(𝑓 = (ℤ × {0}), 0, (𝑝↑-inf((◡𝑓 “ (ℤ ∖ {0})), ℝ, < ))))))
Definition	df-zp 36393	Define the 𝑝-adic integers, as a subset of the 𝑝-adic rationals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ Zp = (ZRing ∘ Qp)
Definition	df-qpa 36394*	Define the completion of the 𝑝-adic rationals. Here we simply define it as the splitting field of a dense sequence of polynomials (using as the 𝑛-th set the collection of polynomials with degree less than 𝑛 and with coefficients < (𝑝↑𝑛)). Krasner's lemma will then show that all monic polynomials have splitting fields isomorphic to a sufficiently close Eisenstein polynomial from the list, and unramified extensions are generated by the polynomial 𝑥↑(𝑝↑𝑛) − 𝑥, which is in the list. Thus, every finite extension of Qp is a subfield of this field extension, so it is algebraically closed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ _Qp = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ ⦋(Qp‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌(𝑟 polySplitLim (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑓 ∈ (Poly1‘𝑟) ∣ ((𝑟deg1𝑓) ≤ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ ran (coe1‘𝑓)(◡𝑑 “ (ℤ ∖ {0})) ⊆ (0...𝑛))})))
Definition	df-cp 36395	Define the metric completion of the algebraic completion of the 𝑝 -adic rationals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ Cp = ( cplMetSp ∘ _Qp)
21.7  Mathbox for Filip Cernatescu I hope someone will enjoy solving (proving) the simple equations, inequalities, and calculations from this mathbox. I have proved these problems (theorems) using the Milpgame proof assistant. (It can be downloaded from https://us.metamath.org/other/milpgame/milpgame.html.)
Theorem	problem1 36396	Practice problem 1. Clues: 5p4e9 12478 3p2e5 12471 eqtri 2784 oveq1i 7422. (Contributed by Filip Cernatescu, 16-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((3 + 2) + 4) = 9
Theorem	problem2 36397	Practice problem 2. Clues: oveq12i 7424 adddiri 11300 add4i 11513 mulcli 11294 recni 11301 2re 12395 3eqtri 2788 10re 12815 5re 12408 1re 11286 4re 12405 eqcomi 2770 5p4e9 12478 oveq1i 7422 df-3 12384. (Contributed by Filip Cernatescu, 16-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((2 · ;10) + 5) + ((1 · ;10) + 4)) = ((3 · ;10) + 9)
Theorem	problem3 36398	Practice problem 3. Clues: eqcomi 2770 eqtri 2784 subaddrii 11625 recni 11301 4re 12405 3re 12401 1re 11286 df-4 12385 addcomi 11479. (Contributed by Filip Cernatescu, 16-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 3) = 4    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 1
Theorem	problem4 36399	Practice problem 4. Clues: pm3.2i 476 eqcomi 2770 eqtri 2784 subaddrii 11625 recni 11301 7re 12414 6re 12411 ax-1cn 11236 df-7 12388 ax-mp 5 oveq1i 7422 3cn 12402 2cn 12396 df-3 12384 mullidi 11292 subdiri 11744 mp3an 1490 mulcli 11294 subadd23 11547 oveq2i 7423 oveq12i 7424 3t2e6 12486 mulcomi 11295 subcli 11612 biimpri 231 subadd2i 11624. (Contributed by Filip Cernatescu, 16-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 3    &   ⊢ ((3 · 𝐴) + (2 · 𝐵)) = 7    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 1 ∧ 𝐵 = 2)
Theorem	problem5 36400	Practice problem 5. Clues: 3brtr3i 5134 mpbi 233 breqtri 5130 ltaddsubi 11855 remulcli 11303 2re 12395 3re 12401 9re 12420 eqcomi 2770 mvlladdi 11554 3cn 6cn 12412 eqtr3i 2786 6p3e9 12480 addcomi 11479 ltdiv1ii 12224 6re 12411 nngt0i 12355 2nn 12394 divcan3i 12041 recni 11301 2cn 12396 2ne0 12427 mpbir 234 eqtri 2784 mulcomi 11295 3t2e6 12486 divmuli 12049. (Contributed by Filip Cernatescu, 16-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ ((2 · 𝐴) + 3) < 9    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 < 3