| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 364 of 512) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31525) |
(31526-33048) |
(33049-51158) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Syntax | cgzg 36301 | The Axiom of Regularity. |
| class AxReg | ||
| Syntax | cgzi 36302 | The Axiom of Infinity. |
| class AxInf | ||
| Syntax | cgzf 36303 | The set of models of ZF. |
| class ZF | ||
| Definition | df-gzext 36304 | The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Extensionality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ AxExt = (∀𝑔2o((2o∈𝑔∅) ↔𝑔 (2o∈𝑔1o)) →𝑔 (∅=𝑔1o)) | ||
| Definition | df-gzrep 36305 | The Godel-set version of the Axiom Scheme of Replacement. Since this is a scheme and not a single axiom, it manifests as a function on wffs, each giving rise to a different axiom. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ AxRep = (𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ↦ (∀𝑔3o∃𝑔1o∀𝑔2o(∀𝑔1o𝑢 →𝑔 (2o=𝑔1o)) →𝑔 ∀𝑔1o∀𝑔2o((2o∈𝑔1o) ↔𝑔 ∃𝑔3o((3o∈𝑔∅)∧𝑔∀𝑔1o𝑢)))) | ||
| Definition | df-gzpow 36306 | The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Power Sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ AxPow = ∃𝑔1o∀𝑔2o(∀𝑔1o((1o∈𝑔2o) ↔𝑔 (1o∈𝑔∅)) →𝑔 (2o∈𝑔1o)) | ||
| Definition | df-gzun 36307 | The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Unions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ AxUn = ∃𝑔1o∀𝑔2o(∃𝑔1o((2o∈𝑔1o)∧𝑔(1o∈𝑔∅)) →𝑔 (2o∈𝑔1o)) | ||
| Definition | df-gzreg 36308 | The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ AxReg = (∃𝑔1o(1o∈𝑔∅) →𝑔 ∃𝑔1o((1o∈𝑔∅)∧𝑔∀𝑔2o((2o∈𝑔1o) →𝑔 ¬𝑔(2o∈𝑔∅)))) | ||
| Definition | df-gzinf 36309 | The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ AxInf = ∃𝑔1o((∅∈𝑔1o)∧𝑔∀𝑔2o((2o∈𝑔1o) →𝑔 ∃𝑔∅((2o∈𝑔∅)∧𝑔(∅∈𝑔1o)))) | ||
| Definition | df-gzf 36310* | Define the class of all (transitive) models of ZF. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ ZF = {𝑚 ∣ ((Tr 𝑚 ∧ 𝑚⊧AxExt ∧ 𝑚⊧AxPow) ∧ (𝑚⊧AxUn ∧ 𝑚⊧AxReg ∧ 𝑚⊧AxInf) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘ω)𝑚⊧(AxRep‘𝑢))} | ||
This is a formalization of Appendix C of the Metamath book, which describes the mathematical representation of a formal system, of which set.mm (this file) is one. | ||
| Syntax | cmcn 36311 | The set of constants. |
| class mCN | ||
| Syntax | cmvar 36312 | The set of variables. |
| class mVR | ||
| Syntax | cmty 36313 | The type function. |
| class mType | ||
| Syntax | cmvt 36314 | The set of variable typecodes. |
| class mVT | ||
| Syntax | cmtc 36315 | The set of typecodes. |
| class mTC | ||
| Syntax | cmax 36316 | The set of axioms. |
| class mAx | ||
| Syntax | cmrex 36317 | The set of raw expressions. |
| class mREx | ||
| Syntax | cmex 36318 | The set of expressions. |
| class mEx | ||
| Syntax | cmdv 36319 | The set of distinct variables. |
| class mDV | ||
| Syntax | cmvrs 36320 | The variables in an expression. |
| class mVars | ||
| Syntax | cmrsub 36321 | The set of raw substitutions. |
| class mRSubst | ||
| Syntax | cmsub 36322 | The set of substitutions. |
| class mSubst | ||
| Syntax | cmvh 36323 | The set of variable hypotheses. |
| class mVH | ||
| Syntax | cmpst 36324 | The set of pre-statements. |
| class mPreSt | ||
| Syntax | cmsr 36325 | The reduct of a pre-statement. |
| class mStRed | ||
| Syntax | cmsta 36326 | The set of statements. |
| class mStat | ||
| Syntax | cmfs 36327 | The set of formal systems. |
| class mFS | ||
| Syntax | cmcls 36328 | The closure of a set of statements. |
| class mCls | ||
| Syntax | cmpps 36329 | The set of provable pre-statements. |
| class mPPSt | ||
| Syntax | cmthm 36330 | The set of theorems. |
| class mThm | ||
| Definition | df-mcn 36331 | Define the set of constants in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mCN = Slot 1 | ||
| Definition | df-mvar 36332 | Define the set of variables in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mVR = Slot 2 | ||
| Definition | df-mty 36333 | Define the type function in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mType = Slot 3 | ||
| Definition | df-mtc 36334 | Define the set of typecodes in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mTC = Slot 4 | ||
| Definition | df-mmax 36335 | Define the set of axioms in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mAx = Slot 5 | ||
| Definition | df-mvt 36336 | Define the set of variable typecodes in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mVT = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ ran (mType‘𝑡)) | ||
| Definition | df-mrex 36337 | Define the set of "raw expressions", which are expressions without a typecode attached. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mREx = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ Word ((mCN‘𝑡) ∪ (mVR‘𝑡))) | ||
| Definition | df-mex 36338 | Define the set of expressions, which are strings of constants and variables headed by a typecode constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mEx = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ ((mTC‘𝑡) × (mREx‘𝑡))) | ||
| Definition | df-mdv 36339 | Define the set of distinct variable conditions, which are pairs of distinct variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mDV = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I )) | ||
| Definition | df-mvrs 36340* | Define the set of variables in an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mVars = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ (ran (2nd ‘𝑒) ∩ (mVR‘𝑡)))) | ||
| Definition | df-mrsub 36341* | Define a substitution of raw expressions given a mapping from variables to expressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mRSubst = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((mREx‘𝑡) ↑pm (mVR‘𝑡)) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ (mREx‘𝑡) ↦ ((freeMnd‘((mCN‘𝑡) ∪ (mVR‘𝑡))) Σg ((𝑣 ∈ ((mCN‘𝑡) ∪ (mVR‘𝑡)) ↦ if(𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑓, (𝑓‘𝑣), 〈“𝑣”〉)) ∘ 𝑒))))) | ||
| Definition | df-msub 36342* | Define a substitution of expressions given a mapping from variables to expressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mSubst = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((mREx‘𝑡) ↑pm (mVR‘𝑡)) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ 〈(1st ‘𝑒), (((mRSubst‘𝑡)‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))〉))) | ||
| Definition | df-mvh 36343* | Define the mapping from variables to their variable hypothesis. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mVH = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡) ↦ 〈((mType‘𝑡)‘𝑣), 〈“𝑣”〉〉)) | ||
| Definition | df-mpst 36344* | Define the set of all pre-statements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mPreSt = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (({𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 (mDV‘𝑡) ∣ ◡𝑑 = 𝑑} × (𝒫 (mEx‘𝑡) ∩ Fin)) × (mEx‘𝑡))) | ||
| Definition | df-msr 36345* | Define the reduct of a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mStRed = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑠 ∈ (mPreSt‘𝑡) ↦ ⦋(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑠)) / ℎ⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑠) / 𝑎⦌〈((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑠)) ∩ ⦋∪ ((mVars‘𝑡) “ (ℎ ∪ {𝑎})) / 𝑧⦌(𝑧 × 𝑧)), ℎ, 𝑎〉)) | ||
| Definition | df-msta 36346 | Define the set of all statements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mStat = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ ran (mStRed‘𝑡)) | ||
| Definition | df-mfs 36347* | Define the set of all formal systems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mFS = {𝑡 ∣ ((((mCN‘𝑡) ∩ (mVR‘𝑡)) = ∅ ∧ (mType‘𝑡):(mVR‘𝑡)⟶(mTC‘𝑡)) ∧ ((mAx‘𝑡) ⊆ (mStat‘𝑡) ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ (mVT‘𝑡) ¬ (◡(mType‘𝑡) “ {𝑣}) ∈ Fin))} | ||
| Definition | df-mcls 36348* | Define the closure of a set of statements relative to a set of disjointness constraints. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mCls = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 (mDV‘𝑡), ℎ ∈ 𝒫 (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ ∩ {𝑐 ∣ ((ℎ ∪ ran (mVH‘𝑡)) ⊆ 𝑐 ∧ ∀𝑚∀𝑜∀𝑝(〈𝑚, 𝑜, 𝑝〉 ∈ (mAx‘𝑡) → ∀𝑠 ∈ ran (mSubst‘𝑡)(((𝑠 “ (𝑜 ∪ ran (mVH‘𝑡))) ⊆ 𝑐 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑚𝑦 → (((mVars‘𝑡)‘(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑥))) × ((mVars‘𝑡)‘(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑦)))) ⊆ 𝑑)) → (𝑠‘𝑝) ∈ 𝑐)))})) | ||
| Definition | df-mpps 36349* | Define the set of provable pre-statements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mPPSt = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ {〈〈𝑑, ℎ〉, 𝑎〉 ∣ (〈𝑑, ℎ, 𝑎〉 ∈ (mPreSt‘𝑡) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑑(mCls‘𝑡)ℎ))}) | ||
| Definition | df-mthm 36350 | Define the set of theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mThm = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (◡(mStRed‘𝑡) “ ((mStRed‘𝑡) “ (mPPSt‘𝑡)))) | ||
| Theorem | mvtval 36351 | The set of variable typecodes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVT‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (mType‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑉 = ran 𝑌 | ||
| Theorem | mrexval 36352 | The set of "raw expressions", which are expressions without a typecode, that is, just sequences of constants and variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑅 = Word (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mexval 36353 | The set of expressions, which are pairs whose first element is a typecode, and whose second element is a raw expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (mTC‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐾 × 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | mexval2 36354 | The set of expressions, which are pairs whose first element is a typecode, and whose second element is a list of constants and variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (mTC‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐾 × Word (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mdvval 36355 | The set of disjoint variable conditions, which are pairs of distinct variables. (This definition differs from appendix C, which uses unordered pairs instead. We use ordered pairs, but all sets of disjoint variable conditions of interest will be symmetric, so it does not matter.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ) | ||
| Theorem | mvrsval 36356 | The set of variables in an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (mVars‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐸 → (𝑊‘𝑋) = (ran (2nd ‘𝑋) ∩ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mvrsfpw 36357 | The set of variables in an expression is a finite subset of 𝑉. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (mVars‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐸 → (𝑊‘𝑋) ∈ (𝒫 𝑉 ∩ Fin)) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubffval 36358* | The substitution of some variables for expressions in a raw expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (freeMnd‘(𝐶 ∪ 𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑆 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ 𝑅 ↦ (𝐺 Σg ((𝑣 ∈ (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉) ↦ if(𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑓, (𝑓‘𝑣), 〈“𝑣”〉)) ∘ 𝑒))))) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubfval 36359* | The substitution of some variables for expressions in a raw expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (freeMnd‘(𝐶 ∪ 𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉) → (𝑆‘𝐹) = (𝑒 ∈ 𝑅 ↦ (𝐺 Σg ((𝑣 ∈ (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉) ↦ if(𝑣 ∈ 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝑣), 〈“𝑣”〉)) ∘ 𝑒)))) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubval 36360* | The substitution of some variables for expressions in a raw expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (freeMnd‘(𝐶 ∪ 𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑅) → ((𝑆‘𝐹)‘𝑋) = (𝐺 Σg ((𝑣 ∈ (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉) ↦ if(𝑣 ∈ 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝑣), 〈“𝑣”〉)) ∘ 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubcv 36361 | The value of a substituted singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉)) → ((𝑆‘𝐹)‘〈“𝑋”〉) = if(𝑋 ∈ 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝑋), 〈“𝑋”〉)) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubvr 36362 | The value of a substituted variable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑆‘𝐹)‘〈“𝑋”〉) = (𝐹‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubff 36363 | A substitution is a function from 𝑅 to 𝑅. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑆:(𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉)⟶(𝑅 ↑m 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubrn 36364 | Although it is defined for partial mappings of variables, every partial substitution is a substitution on some complete mapping of the variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝑆 = (𝑆 “ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubff1 36365 | When restricted to complete mappings, the substitution-producing function is one-to-one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑆 ↾ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)):(𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)–1-1→(𝑅 ↑m 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubff1o 36366 | When restricted to complete mappings, the substitution-producing function is bijective to the set of all substitutions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑆 ↾ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)):(𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)–1-1-onto→ran 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | mrsub0 36367 | The value of the substituted empty string. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubf 36368 | A substitution is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 → 𝐹:𝑅⟶𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubccat 36369 | Substitution distributes over concatenation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐹‘(𝑋 ++ 𝑌)) = ((𝐹‘𝑋) ++ (𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubcn 36370 | A substitution does not change the value of constant substrings. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝑉)) → (𝐹‘〈“𝑋”〉) = 〈“𝑋”〉) | ||
| Theorem | elmrsubrn 36371* | Characterization of the substitutions as functions from expressions to expressions that distribute under concatenation and map constants to themselves. (The constant part uses (𝐶 ∖ 𝑉) because we don't know that 𝐶 and 𝑉 are disjoint until we get to ismfs 36400.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 ↔ (𝐹:𝑅⟶𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝑉)(𝐹‘〈“𝑐”〉) = 〈“𝑐”〉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑅 (𝐹‘(𝑥 ++ 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) ++ (𝐹‘𝑦))))) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubco 36372 | The composition of two substitutions is a substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ ran 𝑆) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∈ ran 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubvrs 36373* | The set of variables in a substitution is the union, indexed by the variables in the original expression, of the variables in the substitution to that variable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑅) → (ran (𝐹‘𝑋) ∩ 𝑉) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ (ran 𝑋 ∩ 𝑉)(ran (𝐹‘〈“𝑥”〉) ∩ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | msubffval 36374* | A substitution applied to an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑆 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ 〈(1st ‘𝑒), ((𝑂‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))〉))) | ||
| Theorem | msubfval 36375* | A substitution applied to an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉) → (𝑆‘𝐹) = (𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ 〈(1st ‘𝑒), ((𝑂‘𝐹)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))〉)) | ||
| Theorem | msubval 36376 | A substitution applied to an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐸) → ((𝑆‘𝐹)‘𝑋) = 〈(1st ‘𝑋), ((𝑂‘𝐹)‘(2nd ‘𝑋))〉) | ||
| Theorem | msubrsub 36377 | A substitution applied to an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐸) → (2nd ‘((𝑆‘𝐹)‘𝑋)) = ((𝑂‘𝐹)‘(2nd ‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | msubty 36378 | The type of a substituted expression is the same as the original type. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐸) → (1st ‘((𝑆‘𝐹)‘𝑋)) = (1st ‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | elmsubrn 36379* | Characterization of substitution in terms of raw substitution, without reference to the generating functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝑆 = ran (𝑓 ∈ ran 𝑂 ↦ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ 〈(1st ‘𝑒), (𝑓‘(2nd ‘𝑒))〉)) | ||
| Theorem | msubrn 36380 | Although it is defined for partial mappings of variables, every partial substitution is a substitution on some complete mapping of the variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝑆 = (𝑆 “ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | msubff 36381 | A substitution is a function from 𝐸 to 𝐸. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑆:(𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉)⟶(𝐸 ↑m 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | msubco 36382 | The composition of two substitutions is a substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ ran 𝑆) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∈ ran 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | msubf 36383 | A substitution is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 → 𝐹:𝐸⟶𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | mvhfval 36384* | Value of the function mapping variables to their corresponding variable expressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (mType‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ 〈(𝑌‘𝑣), 〈“𝑣”〉〉) | ||
| Theorem | mvhval 36385 | Value of the function mapping variables to their corresponding variable expressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (mType‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐻‘𝑋) = 〈(𝑌‘𝑋), 〈“𝑋”〉〉) | ||
| Theorem | mpstval 36386* | A pre-statement is an ordered triple, whose first member is a symmetric set of disjoint variable conditions, whose second member is a finite set of expressions, and whose third member is an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mDV‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑃 = (({𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ ◡𝑑 = 𝑑} × (𝒫 𝐸 ∩ Fin)) × 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | elmpst 36387 | Property of being a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mDV‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝑃 ↔ ((𝐷 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ ◡𝐷 = 𝐷) ∧ (𝐻 ⊆ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ Fin) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | msrfval 36388* | Value of the reduct of a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVars‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑠 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ ⦋(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑠)) / ℎ⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑠) / 𝑎⦌〈((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑠)) ∩ ⦋∪ (𝑉 “ (ℎ ∪ {𝑎})) / 𝑧⦌(𝑧 × 𝑧)), ℎ, 𝑎〉) | ||
| Theorem | msrval 36389 | Value of the reduct of a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVars‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑍 = ∪ (𝑉 “ (𝐻 ∪ {𝐴})) ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑅‘〈𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴〉) = 〈(𝐷 ∩ (𝑍 × 𝑍)), 𝐻, 𝐴〉) | ||
| Theorem | mpstssv 36390 | A pre-statement is an ordered triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑃 ⊆ ((V × V) × V) | ||
| Theorem | mpst123 36391 | Decompose a pre-statement into a triple of values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 → 𝑋 = 〈(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑋)), (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑋)), (2nd ‘𝑋)〉) | ||
| Theorem | mpstrcl 36392 | The elements of a pre-statement are sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝐷 ∈ V ∧ 𝐻 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | msrf 36393 | The reduct of a pre-statement is a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑅:𝑃⟶𝑃 | ||
| Theorem | msrrcl 36394 | If 𝑋 and 𝑌 have the same reduct, then one is a pre-statement iff the other is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅‘𝑋) = (𝑅‘𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ↔ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | mstaval 36395 | Value of the set of statements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mStat‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑆 = ran 𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | msrid 36396 | The reduct of a statement is itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mStat‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝑅‘𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | msrfo 36397 | The reduct of a pre-statement is a statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mStat‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑅:𝑃–onto→𝑆 | ||
| Theorem | mstapst 36398 | A statement is a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mStat‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑃 | ||
| Theorem | elmsta 36399 | Property of being a statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mStat‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVars‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑍 = ∪ (𝑉 “ (𝐻 ∪ {𝐴})) ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ (〈𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝑍 × 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | ismfs 36400* | A formal system is a tuple 〈mCN, mVR, mType, mVT, mTC, mAx〉 such that: mCN and mVR are disjoint; mType is a function from mVR to mVT; mVT is a subset of mTC; mAx is a set of statements; and for each variable typecode, there are infinitely many variables of that type. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (mType‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (mVT‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (mTC‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (mAx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mStat‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑇 ∈ mFS ↔ (((𝐶 ∩ 𝑉) = ∅ ∧ 𝑌:𝑉⟶𝐾) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐹 ¬ (◡𝑌 “ {𝑣}) ∈ Fin)))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |