MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ceqsralbv Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ceqsralbv 3640
Description: Elimination of a restricted universal quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2020.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
ceqsrexv.1 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))
Assertion
Ref Expression
ceqsralbv (∀𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑) ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝜓))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥
Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsralbv
StepHypRef Expression
1 ceqsrexv.1 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))
21notbid 318 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
32ceqsrexbv 3639 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
4 rexanali 3096 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑))
5 annim 403 . . 3 ((𝐴𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝐴𝐵𝜓))
63, 4, 53bitr3i 301 . 2 (¬ ∀𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑) ↔ ¬ (𝐴𝐵𝜓))
76con4bii 321 1 (∀𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑) ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝜓))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wb 205  wa 395   = wceq 1533  wcel 2098  wral 3055  wrex 3064
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-ext 2697
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1774  df-sb 2060  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3065
This theorem is referenced by:  ref5  37695
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator