Theorem ref5 38347

Description: Two ways to say that an intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Dec-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ref5	⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑥)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑅

Proof of Theorem ref5

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equcom 2019	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
2	1	imbi1i 349	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
3	2	ralbii 3078	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
4		breq2 5090	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
5	4	ceqsralbv 3607	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
6	3, 5	bitr3i 277	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
7	6	ralbii 3078	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
8		idinxpss 38346	. 2 ⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
9		ralin 4194	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
10	7, 8, 9	3bitr4i 303	1 ⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑥)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  ∀wral 3047   ∩ cin 3896   ⊆ wss 3897   class class class wbr 5086   I cid 5505   × cxp 5609

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5229  ax-nul 5239  ax-pr 5365

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4279  df-if 4471  df-sn 4572  df-pr 4574  df-op 4578  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-id 5506  df-xp 5617  df-rel 5618

This theorem is referenced by:  dfrefrel5  38554