Theorem ref5 39068

Description: Two ways to say that an intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Dec-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ref5	⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑥)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑅

Proof of Theorem ref5

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equcom 2051	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
2	1	imbi1i 352	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
3	2	ralbii 3108	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
4		breq2 5107	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
5	4	ceqsralbv 3611	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
6	3, 5	bitr3i 280	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
7	6	ralbii 3108	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
8		idinxpss 39067	. 2 ⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
9		ralin 4195	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
10	7, 8, 9	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑥)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3076   ∩ cin 3898   ⊆ wss 3899   class class class wbr 5103   I cid 5549   × cxp 5653

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662

This theorem is used by:  dfrefrel5  39346