Theorem ref5 39388

Description: Two ways to say that an intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Dec-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ref5	⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑥)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑅

Proof of Theorem ref5

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equcom 2050	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
2	1	imbi1i 352	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
3	2	ralbii 3108	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
4		breq2 5106	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
5	4	ceqsralbv 3610	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
6	3, 5	bitr3i 280	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
7	6	ralbii 3108	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
8		idinxpss 39387	. 2 ⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
9		ralin 4145	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
10	7, 8, 9	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑥)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076   ⊆ wss 3896   ∩ cin 4088   class class class wbr 5102   I cid 5545   × cxp 5649

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3897  df-dif 4046  df-in 4090  df-un 4150  df-nul 4278  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658

This theorem is used by:  dfrefrel5  39666