Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ceqsrex2v Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ceqsrex2v 3630
 Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2005.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
ceqsrex2v.1 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))
ceqsrex2v.2 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓𝜒))
Assertion
Ref Expression
ceqsrex2v ((𝐴𝐶𝐵𝐷) → (∃𝑥𝐶𝑦𝐷 ((𝑥 = 𝐴𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜒))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝐶   𝑥,𝐷,𝑦   𝜓,𝑥   𝜒,𝑦
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥)   𝐶(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrex2v
StepHypRef Expression
1 anass 471 . . . . . 6 (((𝑥 = 𝐴𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 = 𝐵𝜑)))
21rexbii 3234 . . . . 5 (∃𝑦𝐷 ((𝑥 = 𝐴𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦𝐷 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 = 𝐵𝜑)))
3 r19.42v 3337 . . . . 5 (∃𝑦𝐷 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 = 𝐵𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦𝐷 (𝑦 = 𝐵𝜑)))
42, 3bitri 277 . . . 4 (∃𝑦𝐷 ((𝑥 = 𝐴𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦𝐷 (𝑦 = 𝐵𝜑)))
54rexbii 3234 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝐶𝑦𝐷 ((𝑥 = 𝐴𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥𝐶 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦𝐷 (𝑦 = 𝐵𝜑)))
6 ceqsrex2v.1 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))
76anbi2d 630 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑦 = 𝐵𝜑) ↔ (𝑦 = 𝐵𝜓)))
87rexbidv 3284 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦𝐷 (𝑦 = 𝐵𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦𝐷 (𝑦 = 𝐵𝜓)))
98ceqsrexv 3628 . . 3 (𝐴𝐶 → (∃𝑥𝐶 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦𝐷 (𝑦 = 𝐵𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑦𝐷 (𝑦 = 𝐵𝜓)))
105, 9syl5bb 285 . 2 (𝐴𝐶 → (∃𝑥𝐶𝑦𝐷 ((𝑥 = 𝐴𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦𝐷 (𝑦 = 𝐵𝜓)))
11 ceqsrex2v.2 . . 3 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓𝜒))
1211ceqsrexv 3628 . 2 (𝐵𝐷 → (∃𝑦𝐷 (𝑦 = 𝐵𝜓) ↔ 𝜒))
1310, 12sylan9bb 512 1 ((𝐴𝐶𝐵𝐷) → (∃𝑥𝐶𝑦𝐷 ((𝑥 = 𝐴𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜒))
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  ∃wrex 3126 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2792 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1781  df-cleq 2813  df-clel 2891  df-rex 3131 This theorem is referenced by:  opiota  7733  brdom7disj  9929  brdom6disj  9930  lsmspsn  19829
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator