Theorem clelsb1f 2927

Description: Substitution for the first argument of the membership predicate in an atomic formula (class version of elsb1 2152). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. See clelsb1fw 2926 not requiring ax-13 2401, but extra disjoint variables. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-May-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
clelsb1f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
clelsb1f	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem clelsb1f

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		clelsb1f.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2	1	nfcri 2914	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴
3	2	sbco2 2540	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑥 / 𝑤]𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑤]𝑤 ∈ 𝐴)
4		clelsb1 2887	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑥 / 𝑤]𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
5	4	sbbii 2112	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥][𝑥 / 𝑤]𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
6		clelsb1 2887	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑤]𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
7	3, 5, 6	3bitr3i 304	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209  [wsb 2098   ∈ wcel 2144  Ⅎwnfc 2907

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-13 2401

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909

This theorem is used by: (None)