Theorem issetf 3486

Description: A version of isset 3484 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝐴 to be distinct. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
issetf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
issetf	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem issetf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		issetf.1	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		issetft 3485	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   = wceq 1534  ∃wex 1774   ∈ wcel 2099  Ⅎwnfc 2879  Vcvv 3471

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-10 2130  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2167  ax-ext 2699

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-tru 1537  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-v 3473

This theorem is referenced by:  vtoclgf  3555  spcimgft  3574  fineqvrep  34715