Theorem issetf 3360

Description: A version of isset 3359 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝐴 to be distinct. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
issetf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
issetf	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem issetf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isset 3359	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴)
2		issetf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3	2	nfeq2 2929	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴
4		nfv 1995	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑥 = 𝐴
5		eqeq1 2775	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
6	3, 4, 5	cbvex 2433	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
7	1, 6	bitri 264	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 196   = wceq 1631  ∃wex 1852   ∈ wcel 2145  Ⅎwnfc 2900  Vcvv 3351

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1870  ax-4 1885  ax-5 1991  ax-6 2057  ax-7 2093  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2203  ax-13 2408  ax-ext 2751

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-an 383  df-or 837  df-tru 1634  df-ex 1853  df-nf 1858  df-sb 2050  df-clab 2758  df-cleq 2764  df-clel 2767  df-nfc 2902  df-v 3353

This theorem is referenced by:  vtoclgf  3415  spcimgft  3435