MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  issetft Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem issetft 3458
Description: Closed theorem form of isset 3456 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝐴 to be distinct. Extracted from the proof of vtoclgft 3511. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Apr-2025.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
issetft (𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem issetft
Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 isset 3456 . 2 (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴)
2 cbvexeqsetf 3457 . 2 (𝑥𝐴 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴))
31, 2bitr4id 290 1 (𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 206   = wceq 1542  wex 1781  wcel 2114  wnfc 2884  Vcvv 3442
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-v 3444
This theorem is referenced by:  issetf  3459
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator