Theorem issetft 3470

Description: Closed theorem form of isset 3468 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝐴 to be distinct. Extracted from the proof of vtoclgft 3519. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Apr-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
issetft	⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem issetft

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isset 3468	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴)
2		cbvexeqsetf 3469	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴))
3	1, 2	bitr4id 293	1 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1569  ∃wex 1811   ∈ wcel 2146  Ⅎwnfc 2911  Vcvv 3454

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-v 3456

This theorem is used by:  issetf  3471