Theorem issetft 3471

Description: Closed theorem form of isset 3469 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝐴 to be distinct. Extracted from the proof of vtoclgft 3521. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Apr-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
issetft	⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem issetft

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isset 3469	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴)
2		cbvexeqsetf 3470	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴))
3	1, 2	bitr4id 292	1 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   = wceq 1561  ∃wex 1800   ∈ wcel 2143  Ⅎwnfc 2910  Vcvv 3455

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1816  ax-4 1830  ax-5 1931  ax-6 1988  ax-7 2029  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-tru 1564  df-ex 1801  df-nf 1805  df-sb 2092  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-v 3457

This theorem is referenced by:  issetf  3472