MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  issetft Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem issetft 3479
Description: Closed theorem form of isset 3477 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝐴 to be distinct. Extracted from the proof of vtoclgft 3529. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Apr-2025.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
issetft (𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem issetft
Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 isset 3477 . 2 (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴)
2 cbvexeqsetf 3478 . 2 (𝑥𝐴 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴))
31, 2bitr4id 293 1 (𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 209   = wceq 1567  wex 1806  wcel 2149  wnfc 2916  Vcvv 3463
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-tru 1570  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-v 3465
This theorem is referenced by:  issetf  3480
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator