MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  issetft Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem issetft 3447
Description: Closed theorem form of isset 3445 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝐴 to be distinct. Extracted from the proof of vtoclgft 3498. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Apr-2025.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
issetft (𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem issetft
Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 isset 3445 . 2 (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴)
2 cbvexeqsetf 3446 . 2 (𝑥𝐴 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴))
31, 2bitr4id 291 1 (𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 207   = wceq 1547  wex 1786  wcel 2119  wnfc 2886  Vcvv 3431
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-10 2152  ax-11 2168  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2711
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-tru 1550  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2888  df-v 3433
This theorem is referenced by:  issetf  3448
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator