![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rexcomf | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Commutation of restricted existential quantifiers. For a version based on fewer axioms see rexcom 3272. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ralcomf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 |
ralcomf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rexcomf | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ancom 462 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
2 | 1 | anbi1i 625 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑)) |
3 | 2 | 2exbii 1852 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑)) |
4 | excom 2163 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑)) | |
5 | 3, 4 | bitri 275 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑)) |
6 | ralcomf.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 | |
7 | 6 | r2exf 3264 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)) |
8 | ralcomf.2 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
9 | 8 | r2exf 3264 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑)) |
10 | 5, 7, 9 | 3bitr4i 303 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 397 ∃wex 1782 ∈ wcel 2107 Ⅎwnfc 2884 ∃wrex 3070 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2109 ax-11 2155 ax-12 2172 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-clel 2811 df-nfc 2886 df-ral 3062 df-rex 3071 |
This theorem is referenced by: rexcom4f 31441 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |