Theorem rspcevOLD 3553

Description: Obsolete version of rspce 3540 as of 12-Dec-2023. Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rspcv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcevOLD	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcevOLD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1918	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2		rspcv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	1, 2	rspce 3540	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3064

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-rex 3069  df-v 3424

This theorem is referenced by: (None)